Beliefs in Foreign Policy Goals and American Citizens’ Support for Foreign Aid

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study examines the role of beliefs in foreign policy goals in accounting for American citizens’ support for foreign aid to various countries. Previous studies on public opinion on foreign policy showed the existence of organized and structured beliefs among the mass public. But few studies explore the effect of these beliefs in goals on American citizens’ policy preferences. Based on the theoretical proposition that individuals are motivated by goals and principles, this study tests the effect of these beliefs on citizens’ support for foreign aid. Two prominent goals that this study explores are humanitarianism and domestic interests. They represent goals of traditional idealism and realism. Results show that, in addition to commonly accepted isolationism, these two beliefs drive citizens’ support for foreign aid. Those individuals who believe in humanitarianism are more likely to support foreign aid, while those individuals who care about domestic interests are less likely to support such aid. Furthermore, more sophisticated individuals tend to be able to use a belief in goals more effectively than less sophisticated individuals in accounting for their support for foreign aid.



Almond, Gabriel A. 1950. The American People and Foreign Policy. New York:
Baker, Andy and Jennifer Fitzgerald. 2011. Racial Paternalism and Mass Support
for Foreign Aid. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
Bardes, Barbara A., and Robert Oldendick. 1978. Beyond Internationalism: A
Case for Multiple Dimensions in the Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes. Social Science
Quarterly 92 (3):545-558.
European Journal of Economic and Political Studies
Bellamy, Alex J. 2002. What’s So Wrong with Human Rights? International Journal
of Human Rights 6 (4):121-133.
Chandler, David. 2002. From Kosovo to Kabul: Human Rights and International
Intervention. London: Pluto Press.
Chittick, William O., Keith R. Billingsley, and Rick Travis. 1995. A Three-Dimensional
Model of American Foreign Policy Beliefs. International Studies Quarterly 39
Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Ideology
and Discontent, edited by D. E. Apter. New York: Free Press.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know about
Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press.
Eichenberg, Richard C. 2003. Gender Differences in Public Attitudes toward the
Use of Force by the United States, 1990-2003. International Security 28 (1):110-141.
Feldman, Stanley, and R. Steenbergen Marco. 2001. The Humanitarian Foundation
of Public Support for Social Welfare. American Journal of Political Science 45
Herrmann, Richard K., Philip E. Tetlock, and Penny S. Visser. 1999. Mass Public
Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework. American Political
Science Review 93 (3):553-573.
Holsti, Ole R. 1992. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-
Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates. International
Studies Quarterly 36 (4):439-466.
Hurwitz, Jon., and Mark Peffley. 1987. How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured?
A Hierarchical Model. The American Political Science Review 81 (4):1099-
Jacoby, William G. 1991. Ideological Identification and Issue Attitudes. American
journal of political science 35 (1):178.
Jentleson, Bruce W. 1992. The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American
Opinion on the Use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly 36 (1):49-74.
Jentleson, Bruce W., and and Rebecca L. Britton. 1998. Still Pretty Prudent: Post-
Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force. Journal of Conflict
Dukhong Kim
Resolution 42 (4):395-417.
Kennan, George F. 1984. American Diplomacy. Chicago: University of Chicago
Kinder, Donald R. 1983. Diversity and Complexity in American Public Opinion.
In The State of the Discipline, edited by A. W. Finiter. Washington, DC: American Political
Science Association.
Knopf, Jeffrey W. 1998. How Rational Is “The Rational Public”?: Evidence from
U.S. Public Opinion on Military Spending. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (5):544-
Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2001. Advantages and Disadvantages of
Using Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American journal of political
science 45 (4):21.
Lippmann, Walter. 1992. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
Luskin, Robert C. 1987. Measuring Political Sophistication. American journal of
political science 31:856-899.
Mandelbaum, M., and W. Schneider. 1979. The New Internationalism. In Eagle
Entangled, edited by D. R. K. A. Oye, and R. J. Lieber. New York: Longman.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. 1st ed. New York:
Milner, Helen V. and Dustin, Tingley. 2013. The Choice for Multilateralism: Foreign
Aid and American Foreign Policy. Review of International Organizations 8(3):
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1952. Another “Great Debate”: The National Interest of the
United States. American Political Science Review 46 (4):961-988.
Nincic, Miroslav. 2012. External Affairs and the Electoral Connection. In The Domestic
Sources of American Foreign Policy: Insights and Evidence , edited by Joseph
S. Nye, Jr. and Gideon Rachman. New York: Rowman & Littlefield,
Osgood, Robert Endicott. 1953. Ideals and Self-Interest in America’s Foreign Relations;
The Great Transformation of the Twentieth Century. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public : Fifty Years
European Journal of Economic and Political Studies
of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences, American Politics and Political Economy
Series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Peffley, Mark, and Jon Hurwitz. 1992. International Events and Foreign Policy Beliefs:
Public Response to Changing Soviet-U S Relations. American Journal of Political
Science 36 (2 (May)):431-461.
Peffley, Mark, and Jon Hurwitz. 1993. Models of Attitude Constraint in Foreign
Affairs. Political Behavior 15 (1):61-90.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter : Communication and Persuasion in
Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richman, Alvin, Eloise Malone, and David B. Nolle. 1997. Testing Foreign Policy
Belief Structures of the American Public in the Post-Cold War Period. Political Research
Quarterly 50 (4):939-955.
Roberts, Adam. 1993. Humanitarian War: Military Intervention and Human
Rights. International Affairs 69 (3):429-449.
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, and Philip Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and
Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Jack. Citrin. 1971. Psychological Sources of Political Beliefs:
Self-Esteem and Isolationist Attitudes. American Political Science Review 65:401-
Sobel, Richard. 2001. The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy: Since
Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stimson, James A. 1975. Belief Systems: Constraint, Complexity, and the 1972
Election. American Journal of Political Science 19:393-417.
Tingley, Dustin H. 2010. Donors and Domestic Politics: Political Influences on
Foreign Aid Commitments. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 50(1): 40-49.
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for
Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Journal of Statistical Software 8(1).
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1986. On the Foreign Policy Beliefs of the American People:
A Critique and Some Evidence. International Studies Quarterly 30 (4):425-445.
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1990. Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and Foreign
Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Dukhong Kim
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge
University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com