Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Tekrarlayan Yedi Gebelik Kaybı Sonrası Başarılı Gebelik: Olgu Sunumu

A Successful Pregnancy Following Recurrent Seven Pregnancy Lossess: A Case Report

Journal Name:

  • Fırat Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is an important obstetric problem affecting about 0.5-1% of women in their reproductive period. Although many etiologic factors have been thought to be responsible, in 50-70% of cases no definitive factors can be found. In studies that assess unexplained RPL cases, providing psyhological support and close follow-up with weekly ultrasonography have been reported to decrease pregnancy losses up to 2-4 times. In this study a successful pregnancy following recurrent seven pregnancy losses in a woman with multiple risk factors is presented.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Tekrarlayan gebelik kayıpları (TGK) reprodüktif çağdaki kadınların yaklaşık %0.5-1'ini etkileyen önemli bir obstetrik problemdir. Etiyolojide birçok hastalık sorumlu tutulsa da vakaların %50-70 inde herhangi bir neden ortaya konulamamaktadır. Açıklanamayan TGK olgularında psikolojik destek verilmesi, haftalık ultrasonlarla yakın izlem ile ilgili yapılan çalışmalarda gebelik kaybı 2-4 kez daha azalmış olarak bildirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada yedi TGK ve multipl risk faktörleri olan bir olgunun başarılı gebeliği sunulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-tekrarlayan-yedi-gebelik-kaybi-sonrasi-basarili-gebelik-olgu-sunumu.pdf
  • 1
7-9
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Salat-Baroux J. Recurrent spontaneous abortions. Reprod Nutr Dev 1988; 28: 1555.
2. Tekrarlayan Gebelik Kayıplarına Kanıta Dayalı Yaklaşım. Seyhan A, Ata B, Urman B. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Der¬neği Dergisi 2011; 8: 5-20.
3. Stirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 1990; 336: 673.
4. Management of recurrent early pregnancy loss. ACOG practi¬ce bulletin no. 24, American College of Obstetricians and Gy¬necologists, Washington, DC 2001.
5. Jaslow CR, Carney JL, Kutteh WH. Diagnostic factors identi¬fied in 1020 women with two versus three or more recurrent pregnancy losses. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 1234.
6. Pregnancy outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complicati¬ons. Trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1343-53.
7. İsmail D, Ozlem O. Diabetes Mellitus ve Gebelik. Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Bilgisi. 1. Baskı Güneş Kitabevi 2006;
435-50.
8. Miller EH. Metobolic management of diabetes in pregnancy. Semin perinatol 1994; 18: 414-31.
9. Easterday CL, Reid DE. The incompetent cervix in repetitive abortion and premature labor. N Engl J Med 1959; 260: 687¬90.
10. To MS, Skentou C, Liao AW, Cacho A, Nicolaides KH.
Cervical length and funneling at 23 weeks of gestation in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 200-3.
11. Grobam W, Peaceman Am: what are the rates and mechansms of first and second trimester pregnancy lost in tweens. Clin Obstet Gnynecol 1998; 41: 36-45.
12. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the
cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. Natio¬nal Institute of Child Health and Human Development Mater¬nal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 567-72.
13. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk wo¬men with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2009; 201: 375.e1-8.
14. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Anti¬septic 1955; 52: 299-300.
15. Macdonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscariage.J
Obstet Gynaecol Br Em 1957; 64: 346-50.
16. Harger JH. Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 56: 543-8.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com