Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Yapılandırıcı Öğrenme Teorisine Dayanan Laboratuvar Aktivitesi: Üniversite Öğrencilerine Suyun Otoprotoliz Sabiti Tayininin Öğretilmesi

A Laboratory Activity Based on Constructivist Learning Approach: Teaching of Determination of Autoprotolysis Equilibrium Constant to Undergraduate Students

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, a laboratory activity based on constructivist learning approach was prepared for teaching undergraduate and graduate students autoprotolysis equilibrium constant and effect of ionic strength and temperature to this constant. The activity that consisted of demonstration, guided inquiry, concept generation and application phases was carried out with twenty-two students randomly selected from senior students in Gazi University, Faculty of Gazi Education, Department of Chemistry Education during the terms of 2001-2002. The effect of activity was qualitatively investigated with in-class observation of researchers, examination of worksheets and evaluation of lab reports. The following has been observed: The activity increases interest and attitude, is positively effective for increasing their motivation, enablesthem to engaged in to subjects and is also effective their socialization.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, lisans ve lisans üstü programlarındaki öğrencilere otoprotoliz denge sabiti ve bu sabite iyonik şiddetin ve sıcaklığın etkisi ile ilgili kavramlarıöğretmeye yardımcıolacak yapılandırıcıöğrenme teorisine dayalıbir laboratuvar aktivitesi hazırlanmıştır. Gösteri, rehberli sorgulama, kavram oluşturma ve uygulama aşamalarından oluşturulan aktivite 2001-2002 öğretim yılında G.Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Kimya Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı4. Sınıf öğrencilerinden rasgele seçilen 22 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Aktivitenin etkisi araştırmacıların sınıf içi gözlemleri, işlem yapraklarının incelenmesi ve laboratuvar raporlarının değerlendirilmesiyle kalitatif olarak araştırılmıştır. Aktivitenin, öğrencilerin derse karşıilgi ve tutumlarınıartırdığı, motivasyonlarınıpozitif yönde etkilediği, derse aktif katılımlarınısağladığıve sosyalleşmelerinde etkili olduğu görülmüştür.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-yapilandirici-ogrenme-teorisine-dayanan-laboratuvar-aktivitesi-universite-ogrencilerine-suyun-otoprotoliz-sabiti-tayininin-ogretilmesi.pdf
  • 1
125-134
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Allen, B.J., Barker, L.N. and Ramsden, J.H. (1986). Guided inquiry laboratory. Journal
of Chemical Education.63 (6), 533-534.
Bodner, George M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of
Chemical Education.63(10), 873-878.
Fosnot, C.T. (1988). The Dance of Education.Paper presented at the annual meeting of
the Association of Educational Communications and Technology, New
Orleans.
Fowler, L.S. (1980). An application of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development in
teaching chemistry: the learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education.
57(2), 135-136.
Gunstone, Richard F. ve Audrey B. Champagne (1990). Promoting conceptual change
in the laboratory. Elizabeth Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.),The Student Laboratory and
the Science Curriculum. Routledge: London.
Hawkins, David (1995). Constructivism: Some history. Peter Fensham(Ed.), The
Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to Its Teaching and Learning.
Falmer Press.
Kılıç, E. and Köseoğlu, F., (1996). Analitik kimya temelleri I, Bölüm, 19.Bilim
Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Pavelich, M.J. and Abraham, M.R. (1979). An Inquiry format laboratory for general
chemistry, Journal of Chemical Education.53(2), 100-103.
Richardson, V. and Renner, J.W. (1970). A study of the inquiry-discovery method of
laboratory instruction. Journal of Chemical Education.47(1), 77-79.
Serjant, E.P. (1984). Potentiometry and Potentiometric Titrations. New York: John
Wiley and Sons.
Shulman, L.D. ve Pinchas Tamir (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences.
In R.M.W. Travers(Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Teaching.
Chicago: Rand McNally.
Tobin, K., (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better
questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics,
90(5), 403-418.
Veath, M.L., (1988). Comparing the effect of diffirent laboratory approaches in
bringing about conceptual change in the understanding of physics by
universty students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3676A
Wulfsberg, G. (1983). A piagetian learning-cycle labaratory approach to teaching
descriptive inorganic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education.58(6), 52-57.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com