Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

“Laboratuvar Kullanımı” Konulu Hizmet-İçi Eğitim Kursu İle İlgili Bir Değerlendirme

An Evaluation Related to the In-service Training about Laboratory Usage

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, following aspects related to the twenty-three Anatolian Teacher Training High School teachers were examined: How much they are familiar with the new teaching approaches and techniques, their views related to the laboratory usage and the cognitive level of the questions they prepared to test the understanding of the students. For the study, the case study method which is one of the descriptive investigation methods was used. The data were gained by examining the teachers’ level of familiarity with the new teaching approaches and techniques, Likert scales which reveal their views about the usage of laboratory and the questions related to the topic that the teachers choose to test the understanding of the students. With the in-service training, the study results proved that there occurred meaningful changes in teacher’s views about the new teaching approaches and laboratory usage and in question levels which the teachers prepared to test the understanding of the students.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada; laboratuvar kullanımıhizmet-içi eğitim kursuna katılan 23 Anadolu Öğretmen Lisesi kimya öğretmeninin; yeni öğretim yaklaşımlarıve tekniklerinden ne derece haberdar oldukları, laboratuvar kullanımıyla ilgili bakışaçılarıve öğrencilerin anlama düzeyini ölçmek için hazırladıklarısoruların bilişsel seviyeleri incelendi. Araştırma için betimsel araştırma metotlarından biri olan durum incelemesi metodu kullanıldı. Veriler, öğretmenlerin yeni öğretim yaklaşım ve tekniklerinden haberdarlık seviyelerini ve laboratuvarların kullanımına bakışaçılarınıortaya koyan likert ölçekleri ile öğretmenlerin seçtikleri konuyla ilgili öğrencilerin anlama düzeylerini ölçmek için hazırladıklarısoruların incelenmesinden elde edildi. Araştırma sonuçları, yapılan hizmet-içi eğitim kursuyla öğretmenlerin, yeni öğretim yaklaşımlarıve laboratuvar kullanımına bakışaçılarında ve öğrencilerin anlama düzeylerini ölçmek için hazırladıklarısoru seviyelerinde anlamlıbir değişme olduğunu ortaya koydu.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-laboratuvar-kullanimi-konulu-hizmet-ici-egitim-kursu-ile-ilgili-bir-degerlendirme.pdf
  • 1
179-193
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen öğrenimi ve öğretimi(2. Baskı). Ankara: Asil Yayın.
Berry, A., Mulhall, P., Gunstone, R. & Loughran, J. (1999) Helping students learn from
laboratory work. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(1), 27-31.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook 1. cognitive
domain.London: Longmans.
Brualdi, A. C. (1998). Classroom Questions, Practical Assessment Research &
Evaluation, 6 (6), Eric Document reproduction no: ED 422407.
Colletta, E. & Chiapetta, A., (1989), Science instruction in the middle and secondary
schools (second edition). Merrill Publishing Company, Toronto, Canada.
Dori Y. J. & Herscovitz O. (2005). Case-based long-term professional development of
science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1413-1446.
Garnett, P. J. & Garnett, P. J. (1995) Refocussing the chemistry lab: A case for
laboratory-based investigations. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(2),
26-32.
Gay, L. R. (1981). Educational research: competences for analysis and application,
2nd ed, Upsaddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J.,& Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the
purpose of this experiment? or can students learn something from doing
experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 655-675.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations
for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.
Hofstein, A., Navon, A., Kipnis, M. & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing
students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type
chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791-806.
Kang, N. H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory
activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science
Education, 89, 140-165.
Lavonen, J., Jauhiainen, J., Koponen, I. T. & Kurki-Suonio, K. (2004). Effect of a long-term in-service training program on teachers' beliefs about the role of
experiments in physics education, International Journal of Science
Education, 26 309-328.
Ruba, P. A. (1985). Chemistry teachers' in-service needs. Journal of Chemical
Education, 58, 430-431
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı1(2007) 179-193 193
Tekin, S., ve Ayas. A., (2002) Kimya Öğretmenlerinin Profesyonel Gelişim Süreçleri Ve
Hizmet İçi Eğitime BakışAçıları”, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Ve Matematik
Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara.
Wickman, P. (2004) The Practical epistemologies of the classroom: a study of
laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325-344.
Wilkinson, J. W. & Ward, M. (1997). The purpose and perceived effectiveness of
laboratory work in secondary schools. Australian Science Teachers Journal,
43(2), 49-55.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com