Fizik Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrenme Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Albaili, M.A. (1995). An Arabic Version of The Study Process Questionnaire:
Reliability And Validity. Psychological Reports, 77,1083–1089.
Austin, L. B. & Shore, B. M. (1995). Using Concept Mapping For Assessment in
Physics. Physics Education, 30,1, 41–45.
Beattie, V., Collins, B. & Mcinnes, B. (1997). Deep And Surface Learning: A Simple or
Simplistic Dichotomy?. Accounting Education, 6, 1, 1–12.
Berberoğlu, G. & Hei, L. M. (2003). A Comparison of University Students' Approaches
To Learning Across Taiwan And Turkey. International Journal of Testing, 3,
2, 173–187.
Bernardo, A.B. (2003). Approaches To Learning And Academic Achievement Of
Filipino Students. J Genet Psychol. 164,1, 101-14.
Biggs, J.B. (1987). Student Approaches To Learning And Studying.Melbourne:
Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J., Kember, D.& Leung, D. Y. P.(2001). The Revised Two-Factor Study Process
Questionnaire: R-SPQ- 2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71,1,
p133.
Bruce, L. B. (2001). Student Self-Assessment: Encouraging Active Engagement in
Learning,Fielding Graduate Institue, unpublished PhD thesis.
Byrne, M., Flood, B., Willis, P. (1999). Approaches To Learning of Irish Students
Studying Accounting. DCUBS Research Papers 1997–1998, No.36.
Byrne, M., Flood, B. & Willis, P. (2001). The Relationship Between Learning
Approaches And Learning Outcomes: A Study of Irish Accounting Students.
Accounting Education, 11, 1, 27–42.
Cohen. J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for thebehavioral sciences (2nd ed.).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cope, C.& Staehr, L.(2005). Improving Students' Learning Approaches Through
İntervention in An Information Systems Learning Environment. Studies in
Higher Education, 30,2, p181–197.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı2 (2007) 25-41 39
39
Dart, B.C., Burnett, P.C. & Purdie, N.M. (2000). Students’ Conceptions of Learning,
The Classroom Environment, And Approaches To Learning. The Journal of
Educational Research, 93, 4, 262–270.
Dickie, L. O. (2003). Approach to Learning, the Cognitive Demands of Assessment,
and Achievement in Physics. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education,
33, 1, 87-111.
Duff, A. (2003). Quality Of Learning On An MBA Programme: The Impact of
Approaches To Learning On Academic Performance. Educational
Psychology, 23, 123–139.
Ellez, M. ve Sezgin, G. (2002). Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrenme Yaklaşımları. V.
Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Bildiri KitapçığıCilt II,
s: 1261–1266.
Entwistle, N., Hanley, M., and Hounsell, D. (1979). Identifying Distinctive Approaches
To Studying. Higher Education, 8, 365–380.
Guimberteau, B. (1992). Extracting meaning from physics texts: standards of evaluation
used by novices,Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American
Educational Research Association (SanFrancisco, CA, April 20–24). (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service NO. ED346109).
Harper, K. A., Etkina, E. & Lin, Y. (2003). Encouraging And Analyzing Student
Questions in A Large Physics Course: Meaningful Patterns For Instructors.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 8, 776–791.
Kember, D. (1996). An Examination of The İnterrelationships Between Workload,
Study Time, Learning Approaches And Academic Outcomes. Studies in
Higher Education, 21,3, 347-358.
Kember, D., Biggs, J. & Leung, D.Y.P. (2004). Examining The Multidimensionality of
Approaches To Learning Through The Development of A Revised Version of
The Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 74,261–280.
Kember, D. and Gow, L. (1990). Cultural Specificity of Approaches To Study. British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 356–363.
Kotrlik, J.W. & Williams, H. A. (2003). The Incorporation of Effect Size in
Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Research. Information
Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 21, 1, 1-7.
Johnston, J. C. (1994). The role of metacognition in enhancing strategy transfer
(Monitoring and Control Instruction). Unpublished PhD Thesis. University
of Washington.
Koch, A. (2001). Training in Metacognition And Comprehension of Physics Texts.
Science Education, 85,758–768.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı2 (2007) 25-41 40
Koch, A. & Eckstein, S. G. (1991). Improvement of Reading Comprehension of Physics
Texts By Students’ Question Formulation. International Journal of Science
Education, 13,4, 473–486.
Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I - Outcome
And Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Mayya, S.S., Rao, A.K. & Ramnarayan, K. (2004). Learning Approaches, Learning
Difficulties And Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students of
Physiotherapy. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice,
2, 4.
Miller, C. D., Finley, J. & McKinley, D. L. (1990). Learning Approaches And Motives:
Male And Female Differences And İmplications For Learning Assistance
Programs. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 2 147–154.
Mpofu, E.& Oakland, T.(2001). Predicting School Achievement in Zimbabwean
Multiracial Schools Using Biggs’ Learning Process Questionnaire. South
African Journal of Psychology, 31, 3, 20–29.
Nguyen, T.N. (1998). Students’ Approaches To Learning Physics in A Vietnamese
University. MS Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Canada.
Prosser, M & Millar, R. (1989). The How And What of Learning Physics. European
Journal of Psycholgy in Education, 4, 513–528.
Prosser, M., Walker, P. & Millar, R. (1996). Differences in Students’ Perceptions of
Learning. Physics Education, 31,43–48.
Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment.
Higher Education, 8, 411-427
Richardson, J.T.E. (1994). Using questionnaires to evaluate student learning: some
health warnings. (2002, Mayıs 25).
Richardson, J. T. E. & King, E. (1991). Gender Differences in The Experience of
Higher Education: Quantitative And Qualitative Approaches. Educational
Psychology, 11, 363–382.
Rouet, J. F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Erboul, A. B. & Millogo, V. (2001). Effects of
Information Search Tasks On The Comprehension of Instructional Text.
Discourse Processes, 31, 2, 163–186.
Schmeck, R.R., Ribich, F.D. & Ramaniah, H. (1977) Development of A Self-Report
Inventory For Assessing Individual Differences in Learning Processes.
Applied Psychological Measurement, 1: 413–31.
Severiens, S. & ten Dam, G. (1997). Gender And Gender Identity Differences in
Learning Styles. Educational Psychology, 17,79–93.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı2 (2007) 25-41 41
41
Stiernborg, M. & Bandaranayeke, R.C. (1996). Medical Students’ Approaches To
Studying. Medical Teacher, 18,3, 229–236.
Smith, P. J. & Smith, S. N. (1999). Differences between Chinese and Australian
students: some implications for distance educators. Distance Education, 20,
1, 64.
Watkins, D. (1996). The İnfluence of Social Desirability On Learning Process
Questionnaires: A Neglected Possibility?. Educational Psychology, 52,260–
263.
Watkins, D. & Mboya, M. (1997). Assessing The Learning Processes of Black South
African Students. Journal of Psychology, 131, 623–640.
Wierstra, R.F.A., Kanselaar, G., van der Linden, J. L., Lodewijks, H. G.L.C., Vermunt,
J.D.(2003). The Impact of The University Context on European Students'
Learning Approaches And Learning Environment Preferences. Higher
Education, 45, 4, 523.
Wilson, A. (1987) Approaches To Learning Among Third World Tertiary Science
Students: Papua, New Guinea. Research in Science and Technological
Education, 5, 59–67.
Wong, N. & Lin, W. (1996). Cross-Cultural Validation of Models of Approaches To
Learning: An Application of Confirmatory... . Educational Psychology, 16,
3, 317–328.
Vertenten, K. (2002). Learning To Learn Physics: The Implementation of Process-Oriented Instruction in The First Year of Higher Education.Unpublished
PhD Thesis. Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen.
Zhang, L. (2000). University Students’ Learning Approaches in Three Cultures: An
Investigation of Bigg’s 3P Model. The Journal of Psychology, 134,1, 37–55.
Zieneddine, A. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Doing The Right Thing Versus Doing The
Right Thing Right: Concept Mapping in A Freshmen Physics Laboratory.
European Journal of Physics, 22,501–511.