Buradasınız

Maddenin Tanecikli DoğasıHakkında İlköğretim 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin İmaj Oluşturmalarına Rol Oynama Öğretim Yönteminin Etkisi

The Effect of Role-Play instruction method on 7 th Grade Students’ the Forming Mental Images about the Particle Model of Matter

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of role-play instruction method and traditional instruction methods on 7th grade students’ the forming mental images about the particle model of matter. The participants of the study were 46 7th grade students in the 2005-2006 academic years. The research design employed in this study was the semi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design. The content analysis technique, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the data colleting and evaluating process. The findings of the study indicated that the role-play instruction method is more effective than traditional methods on 7th grade students’ the forming mental images about the particle model of matter.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin maddenin tanecikli doğasıhakkında imaj oluşturmalarında rol oynama öğretim yönteminin etkisi geleneksel öğretim yöntemi ile karşılaştırılarak araştırılmıştır. 2005-2006 Öğretim Yılında 46 ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencisinin katıldığıbu çalışmada yarıdeneysel ön test-son test kontrol grup deseni uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada veri toplama, veri analizi ve sonuçların tartışılması süreçlerinde ise nitel araştırma metotlarından biri olan içerik analizinden faydalanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen sonuçlardan maddenin tanecikli doğasıhakkında imaj oluşturulmasında rol oynama öğretim yönteminin daha etkili olduğu bulunmuştur.
327-339

REFERENCES

References: 

Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W. and Marek, E.A. (1992).
“Understanding and Misunderstandings of Eighth Graders of Five Chemistry
Concepts Found in Textbooks”, Journel of Research in Science Teaching, 29,
105-120.
Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M. and Westbrook, S.L., (1994) “A cross-age study of
understanding of five chemistry concepts”, J. Res. In Sci. Teach., 31: 147-165.
Atasoy, B. (2004). “Fen Öğrenimi ve Öğretimi”, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 23-24
64-69.
Aubusson, P., Fogwill, S., Barr, R. and Perkovic, L., (1997) “What happens when
students do simulation-role-play in Science?”, Research in Science
Education, 27 (5): 565-580.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B and Silberstein, J., (1988) “Students’ visualization of a chemical
reaction”, Education in Chemistry, 117-120.
Ben-Zwi, R., Eylon, B. ve Silberstein, J., (1986) “Is an Atom of copper Malleable?”, J.
Chem. Educ., 63: 64-66.
Black, M., (1979) “Can pupilsuse taught analogies for electric current?”, School
science review, 69: 249-254.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı2 (2007) 327-339 337
Burton, L.D., (1997) “Hitting the issues head on: using role play in science education”,
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national science teachers
association, New Orleans, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED
411 162),.
Chesler, M. and Fox, R. (1966) “Role-Playing Methods in the Classroom”, Science
Research Associates, Chicago,.
Davidson, R.D., (1976) “The role of metaphor and analogy in learning”, Cognitive
Learning in Children: Theories and Strategies, Levin, J.R. and Allen, V.L.,
Academic Press, New York, 135-162.
Del Pozo, R.M. (2001). “Prospective Teachers’ Ideas About The Relationships
Between Concepts Describing The Composition of Matter”, International
Journel of Research in Science Education, 23 (4), 353-371.
Dreistadt, R., (1969) “The use of analogies and incubation in obtaining insight in
creative problem solving”, The journal of psychology, 71: 159-175.
Duit, R., (1991) “On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science”, Science
Education, 75 (6): 649-672.
Ebenezer, J.V. and Erickson, G.L., (1996)“Chemistry students’ conceptions of
solubility: a phenomenography”, Science Education, 80 (2): 181-201.
Ebenezer, J.V., (2001) “A hypermedia environment to explore and negotiate students’
conceptions: animation of the solution Process of table salt”, Journal of
Science Education and Technology, 10 (1): 73-92.
Farin, S., (1997) “Acting atoms”, Science Scope, 21 (3): 46-48.
Gabel, D.L. (1993). “Use of The Particle Nature of Matter in Developing Conceptual
Understanding”, Journal of Chemical Education, 70 (3), 193-194.
Gabel, D.L., (1998) “The complexity of chemistry and implications for teaching”,
International Handbook of Science Education, 1, Fraser, B.J. and Tobin K.,
Kluwer Academic Publisher, Great Britain, 233-248.
Gabel, D.L., Samuel, K.V. and Hunn, D. (1987) “Understanding the particulate nature
of matter”, J. Chem. Edu., 64: 695-697.
Griffiths, A.K. and Preston, K.R. (1992). “Grade-12 Students’Misconceptions Relating
to Fundamentel Charecteristics of Atoms and Molecules”, Journel of
Research in Science Teaching, 29 (6), 611-628.
Hackling, M. W. and Garnett, P. J., (1986) “Chemical Equilibrium: Learning
Difficulties and teaching strategies”, The Australian Science Teacher Journal,
31 (4): 8-13.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı2 (2007) 327-339 338
Harrison, A.G. and Treagust, D.F. (1996). “Secondary Students’ Mental Models of
Atoms and Molecules: Implications for Teaching Chemistry”, Science
Education, 80 (5), 509-534.
Joyce, B., and Weil, M., (1992) “Models of Teaching”, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 89-108.
Kadayıfçı, H. (2001). “Lise-3 Sınıftaki Öğrencilerin Kimyasal Bağlar Konusundaki
YanlışKavramların Belirlenmesi ve YapılandırıcıYaklaşımın Yanlış
Kavramaların Giderilmesi Üzerine Etkisi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim
Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
Lawson, A.E., (1993) “The importance of analogy: a prelude to the special issue”, J.
Res. Sci. Teach., 30 (10): 1213-1214.
McSharry, G. and Jones, S., (2000) “Role-play in science teaching and learning”,
School Science Review, 82 (298): 73-81.
Nakhleh, M.B. and Samarapungavan, A. (1999). “Elementary School Chilrens’ Beliefs
Abut Matter”, Journel of Research inScience Teaching, 36 (7), 777-805.
Paivio, A., “The mind’s eye in arts and science”, Poetics, 12 (1): 1-18. (1983).
Renström, L., Anderson, B., and Marton, F. (1990). “Students’ conception of matter”,
Journel of Chemical Psychology, 82 (3): 555-559.
Resnick, M. and Wilensky, U., (1998) “Diving into complexity: developing
probabilistic decentralized thinking through role-playing activities”, Journal
of Learning Science, 7(2): 153-175.
Royer, J.M., and Cable, G.W., (1976) “Illustrations, analogies and facilitative transfer in
prose learning”, The journal of psychology, 68: 205-209.
Shapiro, M. A., (1985) “Analogies, visualization and mental processing of science
stories” Paper presented to the Information Systems Division of the
International Communication Association, Honolulu,.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L. and McCharty, S., (1992) “Teaching about the nature
of science trough history: Action research in the classroom”, J. Res. Sci.
Teach., 29: 409-421.
Taylor, C.A., (1987) “Science Education and Information Transfer”, Pergamon,
Oxford,.
Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Lindaurer, I. and Joslin, P., (1992) “Science teachers’ use of
analogies: observations from classroom practice”, International Journal of
Science Education, 14: 413-422.
Treagust, D., Duit, R. and Nieswandt, M., (2000) “Sources of students’ difficultiesin
learning chemistry”, EducaciónQuímica, 11 (2): 228-235.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı2 (2007) 327-339 339
Tsai, C.C. (2001). “Probing Students’ Cognitive Structures in Science: The Use of a
Flow Map Method Coupled With a Meta-Listeining Technique”, Studies in
Educational Evaluation, 27, 257-268.
Ünal, R. ve Zollman, D. (1997). “Students’ Description of an Atom: A
Phenomenographic Analysis”, Department of Physics Kansas State
University.
Van Ments, (1999) “The Effective Use ofRole-Play: Practical Techniques for
Improving Learning, 2nd Ed”, Kogan Page, London,.
Webb, M. J., (1985) “Analogies and their limitations”, School Science and
Mathematics, 85: 645-650.
Weller, C. M., (1970) “The role of analogy in teaching science”, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 7:
113-119.
Yeğnidemir, D. (2000). “Temel eğitim 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinde Madde ve Maddenin
Tanecikli-Boşluklu-Hareketli Yapısıile ilgili YanlışKavramaların Tespiti ve
Giderilmesi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi,
Ankara.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com