Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

IPv6 PROTOKOLÜNE GEÇİŞ MALİYET ANALİZİ ÇALIŞMASI

A STUDY ON COST ANALYSIS FOR IPv6 PROTOCOL TRANSITION

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Due to the software and hardware inconsistencies and security requirements during the transition between IPv4 and IPv6 protocols, an additional cost will be formed and this cost varies depending on the IPv6 support level of IT infrastructure for each country. Therefore while determining the transition strategies a cost analysis should be done for each method. For this purpose two questionnaires are conducted in order to evaluate the current state of public sector and ISPs and determine the requirements during transition. As a result, data extracted from the questionnaires, it is determined that the readiness of the state organizations and ISPs to IPv6 is very low and the transition cost should be more than expected.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
IPv4 protokolünden IPv6 protokolüne geçişte çeşitli donanım ve yazılım uyumsuzluklarının giderilmesi ve güvenliğin sağlanması gerekliliklerinden dolayı ek bir maliyet oluşumu söz konusudur ve bu maliyet her ülke için sahip olunan bilişim altyapısının IPv6 destekleme oranına göre farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bu nedenle geçiş stratejileri belirlenirken her bir yöntem için maliyet analizinin de yapılması gerekmektedir. Bu amaçla kamu ve özel sektörün mevcut durumunun ve IPv6’ya geçilmesi durumunda duyacakları ihtiyaçların bilinmesi önem arz etmiş ve tarafların bilişim altyapısını ve IPv6'ya hazır olup olmadıklarını belirlemek amacıyla iki farklı anket çalışması yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, anketlerden elde edilen veriler ışığında kamu ve İSS'lerin IPv6'ya geçiş konusunda, altyapılarının genel olarak IPv6'ya hazır olmadığı, geçiş maliyetinin ise beklentilerin üstünde olacağı değerlendirilmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ipv6-protokolune-gecis-maliyet-analizi-calismasi.pdf
  • 1
151
161
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SyY81S9,
Address Allocation for Private Internets,
25.11.2011.
2. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63SybztXc,
The IP Network Address Translator (NAT),
25.11.2011.
3. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Sye6llD,
IP Mobility Support for IPv4, 25.11.2011.
4. Majstor F. “Does IPv6 protocol solve all security
problems of IPv4?”, In: Information Security
Solutions Europe, Vienna, Austria.07-09 Ekim
2003.
5. Mohacsi J., Szigeti S., Maray T., “Testing IPv6
Implementations”, Computer Networks and
ISDN Systems, Vol.30, 1617-1625, 1998.
6. Zagar D., Grgic K., Rimac-Drlje S., “Security
Aspects In IPv6 Networks – Implementations
And Testing”, Computers and Electrical
Engineering, Vol.33, 425-437, 2007.
7. Cooper M., Yen D. C., “IPv6:Business
Applications And Implementation Concerns”,
Computer Standards&Interfaces, Vol.28, 27-
41, 2005.
8. Nikkel B. J., “An Introduction to Investigating
IPv6 Networks”, Digital Investigation, Vol.4,
59-67, 2007.
9. Mackay M., Edwards C., “A Managed IPv6
Transitioning Architecture for Large Network
Deployments”, IEEE Internet Computing, 42-
51, 2009.
10. Jayanthi J. G., Rabara S. A., “Transition and
Mobility Management in the Integrated IPv4 and
IPv6 Network”, IEEE International Conference
on Electronics and Information Engineering,
ICEIE 2010, Vol.1, 162-166, 2010.
11. Shin M., Han Y., Kim H. , “IPv6 Operations and
Deployment Scenarios over IEEE 802.16
Networks”, IEEE ICACT2007, 12-14 February
2007.
12. Knoth A., Neuhäuser D., “IPv6-only Nodes in
Corporate and Academic Networks”, Sixth
International Conference on Networking and
Services, 91-96, IEEE Computer Society, 07-13
Mart 2010.
13. Xia Y., Lee B.S., Yeo C.K., Seng V. L. S., “An
IPv6 Translation Scheme for Small and Medium
Scale Deployment”, Second International
Conference on Advances in Future Internet,
IEEE Computer Society, 108-112, 18-25 July
2010.
14. Yan-ge C., Zi-yi H., Shui-mu T., “IPv6 network
comprehensive deployment on campus network”,
International Conference on Environmental
Science and Information Application
Technology, 631-634, IEEE Computer Society,
04-05 July 2009.
15. Kizilkaya Aydogan, E., Soylu M. Y., Gencer C.
Cetin S., Soysal M., Bektas O., Yuce E., Ozturk
Y., Gokirmak Y., Sagiroglu S., “AHP Model for
Transition from IPv4 to IPv6”. Journal of the
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi
University Vol 26, No 3, 701-709, 2011.
16. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SygQ3Hk,
CITC Internet Services Development Project:
Phase II : IPv6 Strategy for the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia, 25.11.2011.
17. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63SyifG6P,
Mikawa S., “IPv6 Activities in Japan”, IPv6
Promotion Council / TF for IPv4 Exhaustion
NTT Communications, 25.11.2011.
18. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63SylJhGy,
Summary of the responses to the ITU-TSB
Questionnaire on IPv6 address allocation and
encouraging the deployment of IPv6, ITU-TSB,
25.11.2011.
19. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SymQmZ
O, IA Connect Vendor Questionnaire,
Department of Defense (DoD) IA Connect
Knowledge Center, 25.11.2011.
20. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SynUu3O,
Roberts, P., Internet Society Organization
Member IPv6 Study, Internet Society,
25.11.2011.
21. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Syp8xtn,
Jiang S. and Carpenter B., Questionnaire On ISP
IPv6 Deployment, 25.11.2011.
22. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63Syq4QW7
Questionnaire on IPv6 address allocation and
encouraging the deployment of IPv6, ITU,
Geneva, 25.11.2011.
23. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SyrV5RW
IPv6 Transitioning Roadmap, 25.11.2011.
24. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63T0lh8hE,
RTI study pegs Internet protocol transfer cost at
$25B in U.S., Triangle Business Journal, 3
February 2006, 25.11.2011.
25. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Syu7o0R,
European IPv6 Action Plan ARIN/CAIDA
survey, 25.11.2011.
26. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Syux7Tl,
ARIN/CAIDA survey results, 25.11.2011.
27. Fernandes J., Friacas C., “IPv6 Benchmarking”,
ITU Workshop on IPv6, Geneva, Italy, 22-23
June 2005.
28. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63Syy5Wm
H, Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
Specification, 25.11.2011.
29. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63SyzSsZe,
Mandatory Reference - IPv6 Plans and Standards
IPv6 Protokolüne Geçiş Maliyet Analizi Çalışması Ş. Sağıroğlu ve ark.
Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. Cilt 27, No 1, 2012 161
Mandatory Reference - Mission BCP and DRP
Checklist, 25.11.2011.
30. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Sz0fhGy,
United States Government Accountability Office.
Report to Congressional Requesters. May 2005.
Internet Protocol, 25.11.2011.
31. İnternet: http://www.rti.org/pubs/IPv6_costbenefit.
pdf, IPv6, Economic Impact Assessment,
25.11.2011.
32. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Sz2QrH8,
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Progress
Report, 25.11.2011.
33. Sağıroğlu Ş., Karacan, H., Alkan, M., Ünver, M.,
Orcan, S. ve Yavanoğlu, U. “Ulusal IPv6
Protokol Altyapısı Tasarımı Ve Geçişi Projesi:
Anket Çalışması”, Ulusal IPv6 Konferansı,
Ankara, s.19-25, 2011.
34. Anderson D. R., Sweeney D. J and Williams,
T.A., “Statistics For Business and Economics”,
South-Western College Publishing, Ohio, 1999.
35. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63T15Vr2D,
Memorandum For The Chief Information
Officers, Office of E-Government and
Information Technology SUBJECT: Transition
Planning for Internet Protocol Version 6,
25.11.2011.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com