Buradasınız

ARNAVUTLUK BÖLGESİNDE KURAKLIK VE STANDART YAĞIŞ İNDEKSİNİN (SPI) KULLANIMI

DROUGHT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF STANDARDISED PRECIPITATION INDEX (SPI)ON THE ALBANIAN TERRITORY

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Drought is a period of inadequate or no rainfall over extended time creation soil moisture deficit and hydrological imbalances. It is an event with adverse impact on the environment, economy, agriculture, energy, social life etc. The evaluation of drought frequency and its severity is carried out using Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). It has become one of most frequently used tools for drought monitoring throughout the world. SPI is based on statistical techniques, which can quantify the degree of wetness by comparing usually 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 or even (sometimes) 24-monthly rainfall totals with the historical rainfall period over the history. The period 1951-2000 is used to evaluate the value of SPI for 1, 3, 6 months. Regarding to the SPI 3 (for three months period) the cases of moderate, severe and extremely dry for every 10 years shows an increasing trend over the period into consideration. These SPI values point out, that period 1981-1990 has the maximum cases with drought (more than 20 cases per decade). During the decade 1961-1970 and 1971-1980 number of cases with moderate, severe and extremely drought is around 10 cases per decade. The year 2003 is one of most distinguished regarding the drought. The values of SPI6 vary from -1.5 in southeast to -4.2 in north of Albania (severe to extremely dry).
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kuraklık, belirli bir zamanda toprakta nem yetersizliği ve hidrolojik düzensizlik yaratan yetersiz yağış veya yağışsız periyodu ifade eder. Çevre, ekonomi, tarım, enerji ve sosyal yaşam vb. durumlar üzerinde negatif etki yaratan bir etmendir. Kuraklık sıklığı ve şiddetinin değerlendirilmesi için Standartlaştırılmış Yağış Endeksi (Standardised Precipitation Index (SPI)) kullanılmaktadır. SPI, tüm dünyada kuraklık gözlemleme için en sık kullanılan yöntemlerden biridir. SPI, tarih boyunca yağış alma periyoduyla, genellikle 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 veya hatta bazen 24 aylık yağış toplamlarını karşılaştırarak nem derecesini nicelendiren istatistiksel teknikleri esas alır. 1951-2000 periyodu, 1, 3 ve 6 aylık SPI değerlerini değerlendirmek için kullanılır. SPI 3 (3 aylık periyot için) ile ilgili, her 10 yıl için orta, şiddetli ve aşırı derecede kuraklık durumları zaman içinde artan bir trend göstermektedir. Bu SPI değerleri gösteriyor ki; 1881-1990 periyodu kuraklıkla alakalı maksimum durumları göstermektedir (10 yılda 20’den fazla durumda) 1961-1970 ve 1971-1980 periyotları boyunca orta, şiddetli ve aşırı derecede kuraklık durumları 10 kere (10 yıllık periyotta) yaşanmıştır. 2003 yılı kuraklıkla ilgili en dikkat edici yıldır. SPI 6 değerleri Arnavutluk’un güneyinde aşırı kurak olacak şekilde sert _1,5’den, kuzeyinde -4,2’ye değişkenlik gösterir.
161
166

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Topal H.,“Lime/Lime - Sugar Waste Pulp Mixture
Usage for Reduction of SO2 Emissions Caused by
Domestic Heating”. J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi
Univ., Vol 15, No 1, 15-29, 2000.
2. Kalaja, E. “Drought Management Centre for South
East Europe” 2009-2012. “DMCSEE, The Final
Conference of the Drought Management Centre
for Southeastern Europe Project” 14 - 15 May
2012.
3. Edwards, D.C., “McKee T. B., Characteristics of
20th century drought in the United States at
multiple time scales”. Climatology Report
Number 97-2, Colorado State University, Fort
Collins, Colorado, 1997.
4. Fusto F., “Niccoli R., A Prototype of Flood Alert
System and the Strengthening of
Hydrometeorological Network of Shkoder Area
for Civil Emergencies - Some aspect of Italian
Regional Cooperation Support Program - RIVA
project” BALWOIS, 2012. - Ohrid, Republic of
Macedonia - 28 May, 2 June 2012.
5. Alley W.M., “The Palmer Drought Index Severity.
Limitations and Assumption”. J. Climate and
Appl. Meteorology, Vol. 23, pp:1100, 1984.
6. Gibbs W.J., Maher J.V., “Rainfall deciles as
drought indicators”. Bureau of Meteorology
Bulletin No.48, Commonwealth of Austria,
Melbourne 1967.
7. McKee, T.B., Doesken N.J., Kleist J., “The
relationship of drought frequency and duration to
time scales”. 8th Conference on Appl.
Climatology, 17-22 January Anaheim, CA,
pp.179-184, 1993.
8. Guttman, N.B., “Comparing the palmer drought
index and the standardized precipitation index”,
Journal of American Water Resources
Association Vol. 34, pp. 113–121. 1998.
9. Muçaj L., Mustaqi V., Eglantina. Bruci E.,
“Meteorological Extreme events and their
Evaluation Based on Climate Change Scenario”
BALWOIS-2010. Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia-
25, 29 May, 2010.
10. Muçaj, L., Mustaqi, V., Laska, A.,
“Meteorological Drought in Albana”.
International Conference Polytechnic. Uni. of
Albania, 2011.
11. Iglesias A., “Coping with drought risk in
agriculture and water supply systems: drought
management and policy development in the
Mediterranean. Advances In: Natural and
Technological Hazards Research, v. 26,
Springer, 2009.
12. UNDP, “The First National Communication of
Albania to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNCFCCC),
Tirana”, 2002.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com