Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Elpif E-Logistics Performance Measure Extension And Its Benefits

Journal Name:

  • Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
ELPIF presents a promising architecture as a generic, multinational and multicultural platform for e logistics. Such generality requires a Performance Measure method to reveal further potentials of the system. Using several metrics available in the logistics literature for evaluating performance of logistics services, uncover a good source of potentially very valuable information. The knowledge gained by interpretation of these findings can be utilized as a further feedback mechanism by the customers of the system. With this motivation this article presents a proposal of an extension to the ELPIF architecture with a Performance Measure Layer and potential benefits of the extension.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-elpif-e-logistics-performance-measure-extension-and-its-benefits.pdf
  • 1
27-33
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

ALAN S. (1997). Logistics - a productivity and performance perspective. Supply Chain Management. 52 - 62.
CLARKE, R.L. (1991). The Measurement of Physical Distribution Productivity: South Carolina, a Case in Point. Transportation Journal. 14 - 21.
COOPER, J.C., Browne, M. & Peters, M. (1990). Logistics Performance in Europe: The Challenge of 1992. International Journal of Logistics Management.
GARLAND C., Trevor D. H. & Henriksson, L.E. (1994). Logistics Performance: Definition and Measurement. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 17 - 28.
GASSENHEİMER J.B., Sterling, J.U. & Robicheaux, R.A. (1989). Long-term Channel Member Relationships. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 94 - 116.
GREGORY N., Stock, Noel P. Greis, J. & Kasarda, D. (1999). Logistics Strategy and Structure. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 37 - 52.
HARRİNGTON, T.C., Lambert, D.M. & Christopher, M. (1991). A Methodology for Measuring Vendor Performance. Journal of Business Logistics. 83 - 104.
LİANG-JİE Z. & POOJA Y. (2001). ELPIF: An Elogistics Processes Integration Framework Based on Web Services.
PRATER, E., BİEHL, M., & SMİTH, M.A. (2001). International supply chain agility - Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. International Journal of Operations & ProductionManagement. 823 - 839.
READ, W.F. & MİLLER, M.S. (1990). The State of Quality in Logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 32 - 47.
YAVAS, U., LUQMANİ, M. & QURAESHİ, Z.A. (1989). Purchasing Efficacy in an Arabian Gulf Country. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
20 - 25.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com