Buradasınız

Üst kaliks taşları olan hastalarda subkostal giriş tekniği ile perkütan nefrolitotomi sonuçları

Results of percutaneous nephrolitotomy with subcostal approach in patients with upper calyces stones

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, we aimed to present the results of subcostal percutaneous nephrolitotomy operation in patients with upper calyces stone. The operation records of 44 patients who had undergone subcostal percutaneous nephrolitotomy for upper calyces stone were retrospectively evaluated. The situations of stone-free and clinically insignificant residual fragments (<4 mm and not causing obstruction) were accepted as success. The mean age of the patients was 44 (7–71) years, and the mean stone load was 805 (120–2240) mm². Of the 44 patients, 18 (42.3%) had isolated upper calyces stone and 26 (59.09%) had complex renal pelvis stones including upper and lower calyceal systems. Single and double accesses were performed in 38 (86.3%) and 6 (13.6%) of the patients, respectively. Of a total of 50 renal accesses, 18 (36%) were performed to middle and upper pole with a subcostal-triangulation technique and 32 (64%) were performed to lower and/or middle pole with a subcostal-direct technique. The situations of stone-free and clinically insignificant residual fragments were detected in 27 (61.3%) and 8 (18.1%) of the patients, respectively. Regarding complications, blood transfusion was required in 11 (25%) patients and hydropneumothorax developed in one (2.2%) patient. We conclude that a success rate of about 80% may be achieved with subcostal approach in selected patients with upper calyces stones especially by urologists who have little experience of percutaneous surgery.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, üst kaliks taşı olan hastalarda subkostal perkütan nefrolitotomi operasyonunun sonuçlarını sunmayı amaçladık. Üst kaliks taşı tedavisi için subkostal perkütan nefrolitotomi geçirmiş 44 hastanın operasyon kayıtları geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Taştan arınma ve klinik önemsiz taş parçası (<4 mm ve obstrüksiyona yol açmayan) başarı olarak kabul edildi. Ortalama hasta yaşı 44 (7–71) yıl ve ortalama taş yükü 805 (120–2240) mm² idi. Kırk dört hastanın, 18’inde (%42.3) izole üst kaliks taşı, 26’sında (%59.09) üst ve alt kaliks sistemlerini de içeren karmaşık pelvis taşları vardı. Otuz sekiz (%86.3) hastada tek giriş, 6 hastada (%13.6) çift giriş yapılmıştı. Toplam 50 böbrek girişinin, 18’i (%36) subkostal-triangülasyon tekniği ile orta ve üst pole, 32’si ise (%64) subkostal-direkt olarak alt ve/veya orta pole yapılmıştı. Hastaların 27’sinde (%61.3) taştan arınma, 8’inde ise (%18.1) klinik önemsiz taş parçası durumu belirlendi. Komplikasyonlar açısından, 11 (%25) hastada kan transfüzyonu gereksinimi olduğu ve 1 (%2.2) hastada hidropnömotoraks geliştiği saptandı. Sonuç olarak, özellikle perkütan cerrahi deneyimi az olan ürologlar için, seçilmiş üst kaliks taşları olan hastalarda subkostal giriş ile %80 civarında başarı oranının, düşük komplikasyon oranları ile birlikte sağlanabileceğini düşünmekteyiz.
17-20

REFERENCES

References: 

Kaynaklar
1. Kane CJ, Bolton DM, Stoller ML. Current indications for
open stone surgery in an endourology center. Urology
1995; 45: 218-221.
2. Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort
P, Gallucci M; Working Party on Lithiasis, European
Association of Urology. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur
Urol 2001; 40: 362-371.20 • Mart 2009 • Gülhane Tıp Derg Tuygun ve ark.
3. Yalçın V, Önal B, Çitgez S, Çitçi Ş, Önder AU, Öner A. Üst
kaliks girişi yapılan perkütan nefrolitotomi olgularında
istenmeyen yan etki oranları ve sonuçlar. Türk Üroloji
Dergisi 2007; 33: 196-201.
4. Şafak M, Soygür T, Göğüş Ç. Perkütan endopyelototomi
deneyimimiz. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2002; 28: 201-205.
5. Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, Preminger GM.
Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous
renal surgery. J Urol 2001; 166: 1242-1246.
6. Pearle MS, Nakada SY, Womack JS, Kryger JV. Outcomes
of contemporary percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in
morbidly obese patients. J Urol 1998; 160: 669-673.
7. Stening SG, Bourne S. Supracostal percutaneous
nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi. J
Endourol 1998; 12: 359-362.
8. Gupta R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Srivastava A, Mandhani
A. Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of the
supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 2002; 90: 809-813.
9. Lojanapiwat B, Prasopsuk S. Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches. J Endourol 2006; 20:
491-494.
10. Vorrakitpokatorn P, Permtongchuchai K, Raksamani
EO, Phettongkam A. Perioperative complications and
risk factors of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Med
Assoc Thai 2006; 89: 826-833.
11. Picus D, Weyman PJ, Clayman RV, McClennan BL.
Intercostal-space nephrostomy for percutaneous stone
removal. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147: 393-397.
12. Fuchs EF, Forsyth MJ. Supracostal approach for
percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy. Urol Clin North
Am 1990; 17: 99-102.
13. Young AT, Hunter DW, Castaneda-Zuniga WR, et al.
Percutaneous extraction of urinary calculi: use of the
intercostal approach. Radiology 1985; 154: 633-638.
14. Golijanin D, Katz R, Verstandig A, Sasson T, Landau EH,
Meretyk S. The supracostal percutaneous nephrostomy
for treatment of staghorn and complex kidney stones. J
Endourol 1998; 12: 403-405.
15. Ogan K, Corwin TS, Smith T, et al. Sensitivity of
chest fluoroscopy compared with chest CT and chest
radiography for diagnosing hydropneumothorax in
association with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.
Urology 2003; 62: 988-992.
16. Kekre NS, Gopalakrishnan GG, Gupta GG, Abraham
BN, Sharma E. Supracostal approach in percutaneous
nephrolithotomy: experience with 102 cases. J Endourol
2001; 15: 789-791.
17. Turna B, Umul M, Mammadov R, Nazlı O. Perkütan
nefrolitotomi: suprakostal ve subkostal girişimlerin
karşılaştırılması. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2007; 33:
196-201.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com