Buradasınız

İnterforaminal bölgenin retrospektif olarak spiral bilgisayarlı tomografi ile radyolojik değerlendirilmesi: dental implant uygulaması için uygunluğun yaş ve dişsel durumlar ile ilişkisi

Retrospective radiographic evaluation of the interforaminal region with spiral computerized tomography: adequacy for dental implant placement related to age and dental status

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation of the anatomical landmarks at interforaminal region with age and dental status by examining spiral computed tomographies. Fifty young (≤40) and 50 older (>40) patients’ interforaminal regions were evaluated with spiral computed tomographic images. In both age groups, 25 of the patients were fully dentate up to mandibular bicuspids contralaterally and the rest were completely edentate at interforaminal region including mandibular bicuspids. The distances between mental foramen to alveolar crest (MF-AC), mental foramen to lower cortex (MF-LC), mental foramen to lingual external border (MF-LEB), mental foramen to contralateral mental foramen (MF-MF), and the height (HMF) and width of MF (WMF) and anterior loop of mental foramen (ML) were measured by an experienced calibrated clinician. In spiral computed tomographic images, MF-AC and MF-LC were significantly lower in edentate subjects being independent of age (p<0.001). WMF and HMF were found significantly smaller in both older and edentate subject groups (p<0.01), MF-MF was significantly longer (p<0.001) in both edentate and older patients, and MF-LEB was not affected by age or dental status (p>0.05). The anatomical landmarks at interforaminal region more likely depend on dental status rather than the age. Safety zone should be 3 mm far from MF for dental implant placement in interforaminal region as the anterior loop of mental foramen was measured as approximately 3 mm
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, interforaminal bölgedeki anatomik noktaların, yaş ve dişsel durumları ile ilişkilerinin spiral bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesidir. Kırk yaş altı ve 40 yaş üstü ellişer hastanın interforaminal bölgeleri spiral bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirildi. Her iki yaş grubunda da 25’er hasta mandibular azı dişlerine kadar kontralateral olarak tam dişli idi ve geri kalan 25’er hasta ise mandibular azı dişleri de dahil olmak üzere interforaminal bölgede total dişsizdi. Mental foramen-alveolar krest arası mesafe (MF-AC), mental foramen-alt korteks arası mesafe (MF-LC), mental foramen-lingual eksternal yüzey arası mesafe (MF-LEB), mental foramenler arası mesafe (MF-MF), mental foramenin dikey yüksekliği (HMF) ve yatay genişliği (WMF) ve mental foramenin öne doğru kıvrımı (ML), deneyimli bir klinisyen tarafından ölçüldü. Spiral bilgisayarlı tomografik incelememelerde MF-AC ve MF-LC, dişi olan hastalarda yaştan bağımsız olarak daha düşük değerlerde saptandı (p<0.001). WMF ve HMF hem yaşlı, hem de dişi olan gruplarda daha düşük olarak, MF-MF daha uzun olarak tespit edildi ve MF-LEB’nin yaş ve dişsel durumdan etkilenmediği saptandı (p>0.05). İnterforaminal bölgedeki anatomik oluşumlar yaştan daha çok dişsel duruma bağlıdır. Mental foramenin öne doğru kıvrımının, ortalama 3 mm olarak ölçülmesinden dolayı, bu bölgedeki implant uygulamalarının MF’den 3 mm uzakta yapılması daha güvenli olacaktır.
69-75

REFERENCES

References: 

References
1. Tarnow D, Greenstein G. The mental foramen and
nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental
implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol
2006; 77: 1933-1943.
2. Neiva RF, Gapski R, Wang HL. Morphometric analysis
of implant-related anatomy in caucasian skulls. J
Periodontol 2004; 75: 1061-1067.
3. Kim IS, Kim SG, Kim YK, Kim JD. Position of mental
foramen in Korean population: A clinical and
radiographic study. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 404-411.
4. Gershenson A, Nathan H, Luchansky E. Mental foramen
and mental nerve: Changes with age. Acta Anat 1986;
126: 21-28.
5. Soikkonen K, Wolf J, Ainamo A, Qiufei X. Changes in
the position of mental foramen as a result of alveolar
atrophy. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 831-833.
6. Xie Q, Wolf J, Soikkonen K, Ainamo A. Height of
mandibular basal bone in dentate and edentelous
subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54: 379-382.
7. Phillips JL, Weller RN, Kulild JC. The mental foramen:
Part 1. Size, orientation and positional relationship to
the mandibular second premolar. J Endod 1990; 16:
221-223.
8. Phillips JL, Weller RN, Kulild JC. The mental foramen:
Part 2. Radiographic position in relation to the
mandibular second premolar. J Endod 1992; 18:
271-274.
9. Phillips JL, Weller RN, Kulild JC. The mental foramen:
Part 3. Size and position on panoramic radiographs. J
Endod 1992; 18: 383-386.
10. Toshihiro H, Ishijima T, Yoshiko H, Toshihiko Y.
Osteoporosis and reduction of residual ridge in
edentelous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 49-56.
11. Karaagaclıoglu L, Ozkan P. Changes in mandibular ridge
height in relation to aging and length of edentulism
period. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 368-371.
12. Oguz O, Bozkır MG. Evaluation of location of
mandibular and mental foramina in dry, young, adult
human male, edentelous mandible. West Indian Med J
2002; 51: 14-16.
13. Aktekin M, Celik HM, Celik HH, Aldur MM, Aksit
MD. Studies on the location of the mental foramen in
Turkish mandibles. Morphologie 2003; 87: 17-19.
14. Guler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, Bicer I. The evaluation
of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones
and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic
radiographs of edentelous patients for implant
dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 741-746.
15. Al Khateeb, Hamasha AA, Ababneh KT. Position of
the mental foramen in northern regional Jordanian
population. Surg Radiol Anat 2007; 29: 231-237.
16. Yosue T, Brooks LS. The appearance of mental foramina
on panoramic radiographs. I-Evaluation of patients.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68: 360-364.
17. Yosue T, Brooks LS. The appearance of mental
foramina on panoramic and periapical radiographs.
2- Experimental evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 1989; 68: 488-492.
18. Kaya Y, Sencimen M, Sahin S, Okcu KM, Doğan
N, Bahcecitapar M. Retrospectıve radiographıc
evaluation of the anterior loop of the mental nerve:
comparison between panoramic radiography and
spiral computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants 2008; 23: 919-925.
19. Frederiksen NL. Diagnostic imaging in dental
implantology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995; 80:
540-554.
20. Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Arensburg B, Taicher S, Kaffe
I. Anatomic and radiologic course of the mandibular
incisive canal. Surg Radiol Anat 2000; 22: 157-161.
21. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of
distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs.
Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 96-103.Volume 52 • Issue 2 Retrospective radiographic evaluation • 75
22. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, vanSteenberghe D, Gijbels F,
Quirynen M. Appearance, location, course, and
morphology of the mandibular incisive canal: An
assessment on spiral CT scan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol
2002; 31: 322-327.
23. Björn H, Halling A, Thyberg H. Radiographic assessment
of marginal bone loss. Odontol Revy 1969; 20: 165-179.
24. Rothman SLG. Dental applications of computerized
tomography: surgical planning for implant placement.
In: Rothman SLG (ed). Computerized Tomography of
the Mandible. Chicago: Quintessence, 1998: 39-64.
25. Kingsmill VJ, Boyde A. Variation in the apparent density
of human mandibular bone with age and dental status.
J Anat 1998; 192: 233-244.
26. Kingsmill VJ, Boyde A. Mineralisation density of human
mandibular bone: Quantitative backscattered electron
image analysis. J Anat 1998; 192: 245-256.
27. Ulm CW, Solar P, Blahout R, Matejka M, Watzek G,
Gruber H. Location of the mandibular canal within the
atrophic mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 31:
370-375.
28. Hwang K, Lee WH, Song YB, Chung IH. Vulnerability
of the inferior alveolar nerve during genioplasty: An
anatomic study. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16: 10-14.
29. Kircos LT, Misch CE. Diagnostic imaging and
techniques. In: Misch CE (ed). Comtemporary Implant
Dentistry. St Louis: Mosby, 1993: 73-87.
30. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, vanSteenberghe D, Sanderink G,
Quirynen M. Appearance of the mandibular incisive
canal on panoramic radiographs. Surg Radiol Anat
2004; 26: 329-333.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com