Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Geçmişten Günümüze Belleği Açıklamaya Yönelik Yaklaşımlara Kısa Bir Bakış

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Long before psychology became a separate scientific dicipline, many philosophers delved into the subject of memory and tried to answer the question, "How can we obtain knowledge about the memory?" Studies in the field of memory have always focused on the subjective and the objective dimensions of memory. The individual's personal history forms the subjective dimension, and the nevral patterns generated by the sensory motor interactions with the environment forms its objective dimension. For this reason, the concept of memory has attracted the attention of diverse disciplines, such as psychology, neurology, psychiatry, biology, physiology. Following the estab¬lishment of the scientific psychology, the concept of memory and memory processes were defined in terms of tasks and paradigms in the cognitive psychology framework. Nowadays, memory is a major technical component of cognition. In this context, as a process, memory refers to dynamic mechanisms associated with retaining and retrieving information about past experience. In this ar¬ticle, the history of the concept of memory will be described briefly.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Psikoloji bağımsız bilimsel bir disiplin olmadan önce birçok filozof bellek konusuyla ilgilenmiş ve 'Bellek hakkında nasıl bilgi edinebiliriz?' sorusuna yanıt aramışlardır. Belleğin subjek-tif ve objektif iki yönü vardır. Bireyin kişisel tarihçesi belleğin subjektif yönü, çevre ile duyusal motor etkileşim sonucunda üretilen nöral örüntü ise objektif yönüdür. Bu nedenle, bellek kavramı psikoloji, nöroloji, psikiyatri, biyoloji, fizyoloji gibi farklı disiplinlerin de ilgisini çekmeye devam etmiştir. Bilimsel psikolojinin kuruluşunu takip eden yıllarda, bellek kavramı ve bellek süreçleri bilişsel psikoloji kapsamında belli görev ve paradigmalarla tanımlanmıştır. Günümüzde ise bellek teknik olarak, bilişin temel bileşenidir ve bu bağlamda bir süreç olarak bellek, geçmiş yaşantılara ait bilgiyi depolama ve geri getirmeden sorumlu dinamik mekanizmalar anlamında kullanılmakta¬dır. Bu makalede, bellek kavramının tarihi hakkında kısa bir tanıtım yapılacaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-gecmisten-gunumuze-bellegi-aciklamaya-yonelik-yaklasimlara-kisa-bir-bakis.pdf
  • 1
51-62
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Atkinson,R.C.
&
R.M. Shiffrin.
(1968)
. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. K.W.Space & J.T.Spence (eds.). The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol.2, New York: Academic Press.
Bahrick, H.P. (1984). "Semantic memory in permastore: Fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school". JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: GE¬NERAL 113: 1-31.
Benjafield, John, G. (1992). Cognition. New Jersey: Simon & Schuster.
Boring, Edwin,G. (1957). A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Bower, G.H. & E.R.Hilgard. (1981). Theories of Learning. (5th ed.). New Jersey: Englewood.Bruce, D.(1985). "The how and why of ecological memory". JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: GENERAL 114: 78-90.
Craik, K.J.W. (1947). "The theory of human operator in control systems". BRI¬TISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 38: 56-61.
Craik, F.I.M. & R.S, Lockhart. (1972). "Levels of processing: a framework of memory research". JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR 11: 671-684.
Eysenck, Michael, W. (ed). (1990). The Blackwell Dictionary of Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Fodor, Jerry, A. (1986). "The mind-body problem". SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 244 (1): 114-123.
Freud, Sigmund. (1984).
Günlük
Yaşamın Psikopatolojisi. (Çev.E.Öndoğan). İs¬tanbul: İnkılap ve Aka.
Gedo, J.E. & A, Goldberg. (1994). Zihin Modelleri: Psikanalitik Bir Kuram (Çev.C.İşcan). Ankara: Medikomat.
Gökberk, Macit. (1985). Felsefe Tarihi (5.baskı). İstanbul: Remzi.
Graf, P. & D.L, Schacter. (1985). 'Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects". JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: LEARNING, MEMORY AND COGNITION 11: 501-518.
James, William. (1890). Principles of Psychology. Vol.1. New York: Holt.
Keller, F.S. (1973). The Definition of Psychology (2.baskı). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Klatzky, Roberta, L. (1984). Memory and Awareness: An Information Processing Perspective. New York: W.H.Freeman.
Mesulam, Marcel, M. (2004).
Davranışsal
ve Kognitif Nörolojinin İlkeleri. (Çev. İ.H.Gürvit). İstanbul: Yelkovan. (Orijinal eser 2000).
Miller, G.A.
(1956)
. "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information". PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW 63: 81¬97.
Neisser, Ulric. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
Neisser, Ulric.(1985). "The role of theory in the ecological study of memory: Comment on
Bruce". JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: GENERAL 114: 272¬276.
Özakpınar, Yılmaz. (1997). Hafıza Yanılmalarının Doğuşu ve İki Ayrı Hafıza Ko¬du Teorisi. İstanbul: Kubbealtı.
Rock, Irvin. (1975). An Introduction to Perception. New York: Mcmillan.
Sandler, J, Holder, A.& C, Dare. (1973). "Frames of reference in psychoanalytic psychology: The topographic frame of reference: the organization of the mental apparatus". BRITISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY46: 29-36.Schultz, Duane, P. (1981). A History of Modern Psychology (3.baskı). New York: Academic Press.
Sternberg, Robert, J. (1996). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace. Tulving, Endel. (1983). Elements of Episodik Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Underwood, Benton, J. (1957). Psychological Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Zangwill, O.L.(1990). Modern
Psikolojinin
Gelişimi. (Çev. Y.Özakpınar). Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Yayınları No:81. (Orijinal eser, 1950).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com