Bir Etik Problem: Psikiyatride İlaç Araştırmaları ve Hemşirelik
Journal Name:
- Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemşirelik Dergisi
Publication Year:
- 2007
Key Words:
Keywords (Original Language):
Author Name | University of Author | Faculty of Author |
---|---|---|
REFERENCES
1. Fulford KWM, Howse K. Ethics of research with psychiatric patients: principles, problems and the
primary responsibilities of researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics 1993; (19): 85- 91.
2. Saunders CM, Baum M, Houghton J, Gillan R (Ed). Consent, Research and The Doctor- Patient
Relationship, “Principles of Health Care Ethics” (Ed. R. Gillon)’da. 2nd Edition. Chichester: John Wiley
and Sons; 1995. s. 457-469.
3. Büken NÖ, Büken E. Tıp etiği ve tıp hukuku açısından klinik ilaç araştırmaları. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi
2003; 14(4): 289-299.
4. Foucault M. Deliliğin Tarihi I, Kılıçbay MA, Çeviren, I. Baskı. Ankara: İmge Yayınevi; 1992.
5. Appelbaum PS. Decisionally Impaired Research Subjects, Disorders and Research Promises- In:
Research Involving Persons With Mental Disorders That May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity.
Commissioned Papers by the National Bioethics Advisory Commission Vol: II. Rockville: 1999. s.
1-4.
6. Dresser R. Decisionally Impaired Research Subjects, Disorders and Research Promises- In: Research
Involving Persons With Mental Disorders That May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity. Commissioned
Papers by the National Bioethics Advisory Commission Vol: II. Rockville: 1999. s. 5-28.
7. Usher K, Holmes C. Ethical aspects of phenomenological research with mentally ill people. Nursing
Ethics 1997; (4): 49- 56.
8. Valimaki M, Leino- Kilpi H, Helenius H. Self- determination in clinical practice: the psychiatric
patients point of view. Nursing Ethics 1996; (3): 329- 344.
9. Holloway I, Wheeler S. Ethical issues in qualitative nursing research. Nursing Ethics 1995; (2): 223-
232.
10. Ramos MC. Some ethical implications of qualitative reearch. Res Nurs Health 1989; (12): 57- 63.
11. Saks ER. Competency to Decide On Teratment and Research, The MacArthur Capacity Instruments-
In: Research Involving Persons With Mental Disorders That May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity.
Commissioned Papers by the National Bioethics Advisory Commission Vol: II. Rockville: 1999. s.
59-78.
12. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. The MacArthur treatmet competence study III: Abilities of patients to
consent to psychiatric and medical treatment. Law Hum Behav 1995; (19): 149- 154.
Bir Etik Problem: Psikiyatride İlaç Araştırmaları ve Hemşirelik
An Ethical Problem: Drug Researches in Psychiatry and Nursing
91
Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi (2007) 82–91
13. Amador XF, Strauss DH, Yale SA, Gorman JM. Awareness of illness in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull
1991; (17): 113- 132.
14. Appelbaum PS. Missing the boat: competence and consent in psychiatric research. The American
Journal of Psychiatry 1998, 155 (11).
15. Oğuz NY. Psikiyatri özelinde klinik araştırmalarda insan denekler ve etik sorunlar. 3P Dergisi 1997;
5 (1): 53- 59.
16. Easter M.M., Henderson G.E., Davis A.M., Churchill L.R., King N.M.P. The many meanings of care
in clinical research. Sociology of Health & Illness 2006; 28 (6): 695-712.
17. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz C. The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric
research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1982; (5): 319- 329.
18. Oğuz NY. Psikiyatride Onam ve Aydınlatılmış Onam: Etik, Hukuk ve Bilim Açısından. A.Ü. Sağlık
Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara 1994. s. 80-95.
19. Oğuz NY. Temel yönleriyle psikiyatride hasta hakları. Psikiyatri, Psikoloji ve Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi
1993; 1 (3): 232- 237.
20. Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), International Ethical
Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Cenevre; 1993.
21. Council of Europe Committee of Ministers. Concerning Medical Research on Human Beings; 1990.
22. Stuart GW, Laraia MT. Principles and Practice of Psychiatric Nursing. 7th Edition. St. Louis: Mosby
A Harcourt Health Sciences Company; 2001.
23. Dabbs AD, Nolan MT. Nurses as members of institutional review boards. Applied Nursing Research
1997; 10 (2): 101- 107.
24. Lawson SL, Adamson HM. Informed consent readability: Subject understanding of 15 common
consent form phrases. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 1995; (17): 16-19.
25. ………………., National Institute of Health National Human Genome Research Institute. 2004- 2005
Institutional Review Board Members. Update December 2005. Available from: http://www.genome.
gov/10004795 Accessed: 24 May 2006
26. Amerikan Hemşireler Birliği. Klinik ve Diğer Araştırmalarda Hemşireler İçin İnsan Hakları Rehberi.
Kansas City; 1975.
27. Rothstein W.G., Phuong L.H. Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician and unaffiliated members of
institutional review boards. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2007; 39 (1): 75-81.
28. Özcan A. Psikiyatride hasta hakları ve psikiyatri hemşireliği uygulamasına yansıması. Türkiye
Klinikleri Tıbbi Etik 1997; 5 (1): 20- 23.
29. Terakye G. Psikiyatride etik ikilemler. Psikiyatri, Psikoloji, Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi 1994; 2 (Ek 2),
30- 33.
30. International Council of Nurses. The ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses. Geneva: Imprimerie Fornara;
2006.
31. Robb SS. Nurse involvement in institutional review boards: The service perspective. Nursing Research
1981; (30): 27- 28.