Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ÜSTÜN ZEKÂLI VE YETENEKLİLERDE CİNSİYET FARKLILIĞI

Journal Name:

  • Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Gender difference which has been studied for many years, has taken on a new dimension as “gender difference in gifted” with growing research on gifted education. There are several researches on the underlying reasons for the underrepresentation of gifted women in science, mathematics and engineering and on the question of “Are gender specific variations among gifted people related with ability, motivation or gender stereotyping with respect to social expectations?” A deeper understanding of the reasons and the impact of gender sensitive variation among the gifted by teachers and parents is very important in terms of achieving effective instruction, mentoring, career planning and enabling social adaptation. The study aims to give insight to literature on this topic and offer crucial information about gender-specific variation among gifted to the teachers, parents and academics working on this field. While addressing to the complexities arising from gender difference between gifted boys and girls, the study indicates that gifted girls are more at risk than boys in suffering from the negative impact of gender discrimination.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Uzun yıllardır pek çok çalışmaya konu olan eğitimde cinsiyet farklılığı, üstün zekâlı ve yeteneklilerin eğitimi ile ilgili çalışmaların son yıllarda ivme kazanması ile “üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli bireylerde cinsiyet farklılığı” olarak farklı bir boyut kazanmıştır. Özellikle fen, matematik ve mühendislik alanlarında üstün kadınların temsil düzeyinin düşüklüğünün nedenlerini; üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli bireylerde görülen cinsiyet farklılıklarının yetenek, motivasyon ya da sosyal toplumun bu bireylerden beklediği cinsiyet rollerinin farklı olmasından mı kaynaklandığını konu alan çalışmalara literatürde sıkça rastlanmaktadır. Literatür taraması şeklinde planlanan bu çalışmanın, öğretmenlere, ailelere ve üstün zekâlıların eğitimi alanıyla ilgilenen bilim insanlarına üstün zekâlılarda cinsiyet farklılıkları açısından önemli bilgiler vermesi amaçlanmaktadır. Cinsiyet farklılığının sebeplerinin ve etkilerinin eğitimciler ve aileler tarafından anlaşılması; çocuklara etkili eğitim verilmesi, doğru mentörlük ve kariyer seçimlerinin yapılması ve sosyal uyumlarının sağlanması açısından önem arz etmektedir. Araştırma, üstün kız ve erkek çocukların cinsiyet karmaşalarını ortaya koyarken, cinsiyet farklılığından olumsuz etkilenme noktasında üstün kız çocuklarının erkek çocuklara göre daha çok risk taşıdığını belirtmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ustun-zekali-yeteneklilerde-cinsiyet-farkliligi.pdf
  • 2
105-117
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Barbara Schober, B., Reimann, R., Wagner, P. (2004). Is research on gender-specific underachievement in gifted girls an obsolete topic? New findings on an often discussed issue. High Ability Studies, 15, 1.
Benbow, C.P. (1992). Academic Achievement in Mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 51-61.
Benbow, C.P. Lubinski, D., Shea, D.L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474-480.
Bleeker, M.M., Jacobs, J.E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 97-109.
Brody, L.E., Fox, L.H. (1980). An accelerative intervention program for mathematically gifted girls. L.H. Fox, L. Brody & D. Tobin (Ed). Women and the mathematical mystique. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Buescher, T, Higham, S. (1989). A developmental study of adjustment among gifted adolescents. J.L. VanTassel-Baska & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Ed.). Patterns of influence on gifted learners. New York: Teachers College Press.
Casserly, P.L. (1979). Helping able young women take math and science seriouslyin school. N. Colangelo & R.T. Zaffrann (Ed.). New voices in counseling the gifted. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Davis, G, Rimm, S. (2004). The Cultural Underachievement of Females. Education of The Gifted and Talented. (5th ed). Massachusets: Allyn and Bacon.
Dunnell, P., Bakken L. (1991). Gifted high school students' attitudes towards careers and sex roles. Rooper Review, 13/4, 198.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choises: applying the Eccles et al. Model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-610.
Ernest, J. (1976). Mathematics and sex. American Mathematical Monthly, 83, 595-614.
Freeman, J. (2004). Cultural influences on gifted gender achievement. High Ability Studies,15, 1.
Greene, M. J. (2003). Career counseling of the gifted and talented. Rooper Review, 25/2, 66.
Hargreaves, M., Homer, M., Swinnerton, B. (2008). A comparison of performance and attitudes in mathematics amongst the ‘gifted’. Are boys better at mathematics or do they just think they are? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15, 1, 19-38.
Hebert, T. P. (2001). “If I had a new notebook, I know things would change”: Bright underachieving young men in urban classrooms. Gifted Child Ouarterly, 45, 174-194.
Karnes, F.A., D’Ilio, V.R.(1989). Leadreship positions and sex role stereotyping among gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 76-78.
Lubinski, D., Benbow C.P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implicaitons for the maths-science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-66.
Matthews & Foster. (2005). Difference Between Boys and Girls. Being Smart about Gifted Children. Great Potential: ABD.Obringer, J., Obringer, M. (1995). Gender Differences In Intellectual Profiles of Gifted Male and Female Elementary Students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S. (2011). Gender and Other Group Differences in Performance on Off-Level Tests: Changes in the 21st Century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55: 54.
Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Kleine, M. (2008). Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: comparing girl’s and boy’s achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 2.
Reis, S., Hebert, T. (2008). Gender and giftedness. S. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Giftedness in Children, 271-292, Florida: Springer.
Reis, S.M., McCoach, B. (2000). The Underachievement of Gifted Students: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-170.
Rubin, J.Z., Provenzano, F, Luria, Z. (1974). The eye of the beholder: parents' view on sex of newborns. The American Journal Of Orthopsychiatry, 44 (4), 512-521.
Ryan, J.J., (1999). Behind the mask: exploring the need for the specialized counseling for the gifted females. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 22/5, 14-17.
Silverman, L. (1993). Gender issues. L.K. Silverman (Eds.), Counseling the gifted & talented, 295-306, Colorado: Love Publishing Company.
Spelke, E.S., Grace, A. D. (2007). Sex, math, and Science.W. M. Williams & S.J. Ceci (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. 57-67, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tenenbaum, H.R., Leaper, C. (2003). Parent-child conversation about science: The socialization of gender inequities? Developmental Psychology, 39, 34-47.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com