Buradasınız

CMMI 2. DÜZEY OLGUNLUK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İÇİN ANKET TABANLI BİR YÖNTEM

A QUESTIONNAIRE BASED METHOD FOR CMMI LEVEL 2 MATURITY ASSESSMENT

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
CMMI has gained widespread acceptance as a viable software process assessment model. In this study, we take up CMMI, and consider the first maturity level or level 2 of the model for companies new to CMMI or just beginning to adopt CMMI in their process improvement efforts. A questionnaire based assessment method was developed primarily intended to be facilitate quick assessment or self assessment of CMMI maturity level 2 of a software company. The questionnaire can also be used for process improvement purposes. The paper reports on the results of conducting the questionnaire at five software companies and discusses its value as an indication of maturity at level 2 of CMMI and draws conclusions.
Abstract (Original Language): 
CMMI, geçerli bir yazılım süreç değerlendirme modeli olarak yaygın kabul görmektedir. Bu çalışmada, CMMI ele alınmakta ve kendi süreç iyileştirme çalışmalarında CMMI’ a yeni veya henüz adapte olmaya başlayan firmalar için modelin birinci veya ikinci olgunluk düzeyi göz önünde bulundurulmaktadır. Öncelikli olarak bir yazılım firmasının hızlı değerlendirme yapması veya kendi CMMI 2. düzey olgunluk değerlendirmesini kolaylaştırması için bir anket tabanlı değerlendirme metodu geliştirilmiştir. Aynı zamanda bu anket süreç iyileştirme amaçları için de kullanılabilmektedir. Makale, 5 yazılım firmasında yürütülen anket sonuçlarını vermektedir. CMMI 2. düzey olgunluk göstergesi olarak bu anket değerleri ele alınmakta ve sonuçlar ortaya konulmaktadır.
39
46

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Bieman J., “Editorial: The Illusive Nature of
Quality”, Software Quality Journal, Vol: 11, Number:
1, Pages: 7-8, 2003
[2] Dromey R. G., “Software Quality, Prevention
versus Cure?”, Software Quality Journal, Vol: 11,
Number: 3, Pages: 197-261, 2003.
[3] Pino F., Garcia F., and Piattini M., “Software
process improvement in small and medium software
enterprises: a systematic review”, Software Quality
Journal, Vol: 16, Number: 2, Pages: 237-261, 2008.
[4] Herbsleb J., Carleton A., Rozum J., Siegel J.,
Zubrow D., “Benefits of CMM-Based Software
Process Improvement: Initial Results, Technical
Report CMU/SEI-94-TR-14”, Software Engineering
Institute, Pittsburgh, 1994.
[5] Goldenson D.R., Herbsleb J.D., “After the
Appraisal: A Systematic Survey of Process
Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence
Success”, Technical Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-009,
Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering
Institute, 1995.
[6] Staples M., Niazi M., Jeffery R., Abrahams A.,
Byatt P., Murphy R., “An exploratory study of why
organizations do not adopt CMMI”, J. System
Software, Elsevier Science Inc., Vol: 80, Number: 6,
Pages: 883-895, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
[7] Hyde W., “Intangible benefits of CMM-based
software process improvement”, Software Process
Improvement and Practice, Vol: 9, Pages: 217-228,
2004.
[8] Jung H. W., Hunter R., Goldenson D., El-
Emam K., “Findings from Phase 2 of the SPICE
Trials”, Software Process Improvement and Practice,
Vol: 6, Number: 4, Pages: 205-242, 2002.
[9] Mary Beth Chrissis, Mike Konrad, Sandy
Shrum: “CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration
and Product Improvement, 2nd Edition”, Addison
Wesley, 2007.
[10] Yoo C., Yoon J., Lee B., Lee C., Lee J., Hyun
S., Wu C., “An Integrated Model of ISO 9001: 2000
and CMMI for ISO Registered Organizations”,
APSEC ’04: Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific
Software Engineering Conference, ISBN: 0-7695-
2245-9, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC,
USA, 2004.
[11] Sun-Jen Huang, Wen-Ming Han: “Selection
priority of process areas based on CMMI continuous
representation”, Inf. Manage., Elsevier Science
Publishers B. V., Vol: 43, Number: 3, Pages: 297-307,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006
[12] Yucalar, F., “Evaluation of companies which
are being in the software sector has an understanding
process focused quality management with the CMMI
staged model (Master Thesis)”, Maltepe University,
Istanbul, Turkey, 2006.
[13] Ekdahl F., Larsson S., Experience Report:
“Using Internal CMMI Appraisals to Institutionalize
Software Development Performance Improvement”,
EUROMICRO ’06: Proceedings of the 32nd
EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering
and Advanced Applications, ISBN: 0-7695-2594-6,
IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA,
2006.
[14] Gray E., Sampaio A., and Benediktsson O., “An
Incremental Approach to Software Process
Assessment and Improvement”, Software Quality
Journal, Vol: 13, Number: 1, Pages: 7-16, 2005

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com