Buradasınız

“Comparison of different teaching methodologies in a Medical college in North India.”

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Introduction: The emerging technologies & the technological advances made day by day are changing the methods & techniques of teaching all over around us. Methodology: The technique of teaching has seen drastic changes in the last decade with the new techniques available ranging from Power-point presentation to the video class rooms which converts the traditional class rooms to smart class rooms. The newer techniques as claimed, has advantages to provide more complete knowledge than the traditional one but at the same time it is also under the criticism by different people that it will not change the performance of the students. Keeping this in mind the present study was planned to compare the various teaching techniques. Results & Conclusion: Regardless of the teaching aid used the impact of a lecture depends on the teacher. Teachers should guide without dictating, and participate without dominating. Smart classrooms are a new concept of teaching but unfortunately we can’t compare it due to lack of this facility.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
464-469

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Theall, M. and Franklin, J. (2001). Looking for Bias in all the Wrong Places – A Search for Truth or a Witch Hunt in
Student Ratings of Instruction? In The Student Ratings Debate: Are they Valid? How Can We Best Use Them? Theall, P.,
Abrami, L. and Lisa Mets (Eds.) New Directions in Educational Research, no. 109. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Doyle.T. (n.d.). Evaluating Teachers Effectiveness. Retrieved July 24, 2008, from
ferris.edu/fctl/Teaching_and_Learning_Tips/.../EvalTeachEffec.htm.
Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research; March 2013: Issue-6, Vol.-2, P. 464-469
469
www.ijbamr.com
3. Murray, H. G. (1994). Can Teaching Be Improved? Canada: Brock University.
4. Chang, T.S. (2001). The effect of system administration on faculty attitudes toward student ratings. Hualien, Taiwan:
National Hualien Teachers College.
5. Hoyt, M. P., &Pallett, W. H. (1999). ). Appraising teaching effectiveness: Beyond student ratings. IDEA. Paper No. 36.
Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development. Retrieved June 1, 2002, from
http://www.idea.ksu.edu/products/Papers.html
6. Ory, J. C. (1980). The Influence of Students’ Affective Entry on Instructor and Course Evaluations. Review of Higher
Education, 4, 13 – 24.
7. Scriven, M. (1995). Student ratings offer useful input to teacher evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research and
Evaluation, 4(7), 1-5. Retrieved May 27, 2002 from http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=4&n=7
8. Franklin, J. (2001). Interpreting the numbers: Using a narrative to help others read student evaluations of your teaching
accurately. In K. G. Lewis (Ed.) Techniques and strategies for interpreting student evaluations. New Directions for
Teaching and Learning, 87, 85-99. San Francisco, Ca: Jossey-Bass.
9. Braskamp, L. A. (2000). Toward a more holistic approach to assessing faculty as teachers. In K. E. Ryan (Ed.),
Evaluating teaching in higher education: A vision for the future. New directions for teaching and learning, 83, 109-123.
San Francisco, Ca: Jossey-Bass.
10. Braskamp, L. A., &Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and instructional performance. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Arreola, R. A. (1995). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
12. Pratt, D. (1997). Reconceptualizing the evaluation of teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 34, 23-44.
13. Montgomery, M.J. (n.d.). An Analysis Of Student Feedback Systems. Retrieved July 24, 2009, from
(http://www.sdsu.edu/campusinfo/mission.html).
14. Cuseo, J. (n.d.). The case for student evaluation of college courses. Policy Center on the First Year of College. Retrieved
May 27, 2002, from http://www.brevard.edu/fyc/fya/CuseoLink.htm
15. Ory, J. C., and Ryan, K. (2001). How does Student Ratings Measure up to a New Validity Framework? In M. Theall, P.
Abrami, and L. Mets (eds.), The Student Ratings Debate: Are they Valid? How can we best Use Them? New Directions
for Institutional Research, no. 109, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Theall, M. (n.d.). Students Ratings: Myths vs. Research Evidence. Retrieved 24 July, 2009, from
https://studentratings.byu.edu/info/faculty/myths.asp
17. Novelli ELB, Fernandes AAH. Students’ preferred teaching techniques for biochemistry in biomedicine and medicine
courses. BiochemMolBiol Educ. 2007;35:263–266.
18. Savoy A, Proctor RW, Salvendy G. Information retention from PowerPoint and traditional lectures. Comput Educ.
2009;52:858–867
19. Cannon R. Lecturing, Kensington, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia; 1988.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com