Buradasınız

Trends in body donation for medical education: 10 year retrospective study

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Introduction: Dissection of cadavers is an integral part of medical education. Modern imaging techniques may have lead to better understanding of disease processes but knowledge of the normal structure of human body is acquired best by dissection. Hence a steady supply of cadavers is essential to meet that requirement. Moreover it also helps aspiring surgeons to practice new techniques and hone their skills. Methodology: Profile of 225 voluntarily donated cadavers were studied through a ten year period at our institute. Age, sex and fate of those cadavers were noted and relevant numerical data were derived. Results: More male cadavers were donated than females. However both youngest and oldest cadavers were females. The average age of cadavers was 68.57 years. An increase in donation was observed from 2004 through 2010. Increase in cadavers leads to greater availability of dissection. Conclusion: Present trend of voluntary body donation is mostly sufficient for dissection as well as for supply to other medical institutions. Supply of bones and viscerae are in shortfall. There is a scarcity of female and young cadavers which need to be overcome. Efforts must be sustained to motivate more people to bequeth their bodies to meet future demands by new medical institutions for dissection and advancement of medical science.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
1089-1092

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Medical Council of India. Medical Council of India Regulations on Graduate Medical
Education 1997
2. Sehirli US, Saka E, Sarikaya O. Attitudes of Turkish anatomists towards cadaver donation. Clin Anat
2004; 17(8):677-81
3. Ballala K, Shetty A, Malpe SB. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding whole body donation
among medical professionals in a hospital in India. Anatomical Science Education 2011; 4(3): 142-50
4. Agthong S and Wiwanitkit V. Cadaver donation: a retrospective review at the King
Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok. The South east Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and
Public Health 2002; 33 Suppl 3:166-7
5. Burnprasert T. The new potential of surgical training: surgical training centre. Chula Med J 1998;
42:413-5
6. Moore KL and Dalley AF. Introduction to clinically oriented Anatomy. In: Moore KL and Dalley AF
eds. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006:12
7. Rokade SA and Bahetee BH. Body donation a review. Medical Journal of Western India 2013;
41(1):36-41
8. Boulware LE, Ratner LE, Sosa JA, Cooper LA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Transplantation 2002;
73(10):1683-91
9. Armstrong GT. Age: An indicator of willingness to donate. J Transplant Coord 1996; 6(4):171-3
10. Alashek W, Ehtuish E, Elhabashi A, Emberish W, Mishra A. Reasons for willingness of Libyans to
donate organs after death. Libyan J Med 2009; 4(3):111-3
11. Goyal PK and Gupta M. Study of the profile of cadavers donated to Anatomy Department of a private
medical College of Punjab for medical research vis a vis body donation programme: A first hand
experience of five years. Journal of Research in Medical Education & Ethics 2011; 1(3):176-79
12. Ajita R and Singh YI. Body donation and its relevance in anatomy learning-a review JASI 2007;
56(1):44-7
13. Boulware LE, Ratner LE, Cooper LA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Whole body donation for medical
science: a population based study. Clinical Anatomy 2004; 17(7):570-7
14. Dluzen DE, Brammer CM, Bernard JC, Keyser MR. Survey of cadaveric donors to a body donor
program: 1978-1993. CLIN Anat 1996; 9(3):183-92

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com