Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Biocidal Activity Of Spinosad Against Selected Soil Beneficial And Plant Pathogenic Microbes

Journal Name:

  • Indian Streams Research Journal

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
This research was initiated to investigate the antimicrobial activity of Spinosad (Microbial metabolite) which is a new type of insecticide with natural origin was studied for its activity against selected soil beneficial microbes and plant pathogenic microbes were tested against spinosad for its activity. The activity of spinosad was tested against soil beneficial and plant pathogenic microbes by disc diffusion method. The spinosad was prepared at 1 ppm, 5 ppm & 10 ppm concentrations and tested against bacteria & fungi. The mean and S.D value of soil beneficial bacteria against spinosad at 1ppm concentration was 2±3.46 (95% confidence level), at 5ppm concentration 2.33±4.04,and at 10 ppm concentration the value was 4.66±4.04.the activity of spinosad against soil beneficial bacteria was low when compared to plant pathogenic bacteria when comparing the results, The mean and S.D of plant pathogenic bacteria at 1ppm was (12±7), at 5 ppm (13.66±1.15) and at10 ppm (15±2) so, from this results we have concluded that spinosad is harmless to soil beneficial bacteria and fungi whereas harmful to disease causing Plant pathogenic microbes.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_pp_.pdf
  • 9
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

I.Artur Mikiciñski., Piotr Sobiczewski., Stanis³aw
Berczyñski. 2012 Efficacy of fungicides and essential oils
against bacterial diseases of fruit trees. Journal of plant
protection research vol. 52, no. 4.
II.Brkoviæ L. Duško., Ljiljana Comiæ., Slavica Solujiæ-
Sukdolak. 2006. Antibacterial activity of some plants
III.from family apiaceae in relation to selected
phytopathogenic bacteria. kragujevac j. sci. 28:65-72.
IV.Cramer D.A., Barton R.A., Shorland F.B., Chochanska
.Z. 1967. A comparison of the effects of white clover
(Trifolium repens) and of perennial ryegrass (Lolium
perenne) on fat composition and flavour of lamb. J. Agric.
Sci., 69: 367-373.
V.Crouse G.D., Sparks T.C.1998. “Naturally derived
materials as products and leads for insect control: The
spinosyns”,Rev. Toxicol., 2, 133—146.
VI.Kukreja Girish P., Bhute Shrikant S., Mangate Sunil A.,
Dhawale Manish N. 2010. Exploring the potential of
Pseudomonas species as phosphate solubilizer, plant growth
promoter, biocontrol agent and pesticide degrader.Original
article. Asian j. exp. biol. sci.spl. 40-44.
VII.Liu T.U., Sparks A.N., Hendrix W.H., Yue B.1999.
Effects of spintor on cabbage looper.toxicology and
persistence of leaf residue on cabbage under field and
laboratory conditions.J.econ.entomol.92:1266-1273.
VIII.Mertz E.P., Yao R.C. 1990. Saccharopolyspora
spinosad sp nov. Isolated from soil collected in a sugar rum
still. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 40: 34–9.
IX.Naresh kumar .A., Murugan.K., Madhiyazhagan. P.,
Prabhu.K. 2011. Spinosad and Neem Seed Kernel Extract as
Bio-Controlling agents for Malarial Vector, Anopheles
stephensi and Non-Biting Midge,Chironomus circumdatus
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 1-5.
X.Qinggui Wang., Lijian Xu. 2012. Beauvericin, a Bioactive
Compound Produced by Fungi:A Short Review. Molecules,
17, 2367-2377.
XI.Thompson.G., Hutchins.S.1999 .Spinosad pesticide
outlook,10:78-81.
XII.Walsh S.E., Maillard J.Y., Russell A.D., Catrenich C.E.,
Charbonneau D.L., Bartolo R.G. 2003. Activity and
mechanisms of action of selected biocidal agents on Grampositive
and -negative bacteria , the Society for Applied
Microbiology, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 94,
240–247.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com