Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Karın duvarı defekti veya hernilerde kullanılan prostetik materyallerin karşılaştırılması

The comparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernia

Journal Name:

  • İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1994

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, we compared the prosthetic materials (polypropylene and polytetrajluoroethylene) with respect to infection, deve/o/mient of adhesions and occurrence of hernias in rats which defects of the abdominal wall measuring I by 2 centimeters were repaired one of the prosthetic materials. There was no significant difference between control and other groups with respect to infection and occurrence of hernias. Adhesions were more marked with polypropylene and it was statistically significant (p 0.05 ). /Journal of Turgut Özal Medical Center I (2):"9-S2.1994/
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, rotlarda oluşturulan 2x1 cm havutlarında karın duvarı defekti. farklı prostetik materyaller (polypropylene ve polytetrajluoroethylene) ile tamir edilerek enfeksiyon, yapışıklık ve herni oluşumu yönünden farklılıklar araştırıldı. Enfeksiyon ve herni oluşumu yönünden gruplar arasında istatistiksel anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Polypropylene kullanılan grupta yapışıklık daha fazla, kontrol ve polytetrajluoroethylene grubuna göre farklılık istatistiksel olarak anlamlı idi (p 0.05 ). /Turgut (hal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi 1(2): "9-S2. 199-1/
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-karin-duvari-defekti-hernilerde-kullanilan-prostetik-materyallerin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 2
79-82
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Brown GL, Richardson D, Malangoni MA et al. Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection. Ann Surg 1985; 201:705-711.
2. Bendavid R. The rational use of mesh in hernias. Int Surg 1992; 77:229-231.
3. Tyrell J, Silberman H, Chandrasoma P et al. Absorbable versus permanent mesh in abdominal operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989; 168:227¬232.
4. Marmon LM, Vinocur CD, Standiford SB et al Evaluation of absorbable polyglycolic acid mesh as a wound support. J Ped Surg 1985; 20:737-742.
5. Larson GM, Harrower HW. Plastic mesh repair of incisional hernias. Am J Surg 1978; 135:559-563
6. Kaufman Z, Engleberg M, Zager M: Fecal fistula. A late complication of Marlex mesh repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1981; 24:543-544
7. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK et al. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1989; 157:188-193.
8. Boyd W. Use of marlex mesh in acute loss of the abdominal wall due to infection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977; 144:251-252.
9. Lei B, Bleichrodt RP, Simmermacher RKJ, Schilfgaarde R. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of large abdominal wall defects Br J Surg 1989; 76:803-805.
10. Berliner SD. Clinical experience wit h an inlay expanded polytetrafluoruethylene soft tissue patch as an adjunct in inguinal hernia repair Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 176:323-326.
II Lamb JP, Vitale T, Kaminski DL. Comparative evaluation of synthetic meshes used for abdominal
wall replacement. Surgery 1983; 93:643-648 12. Jenkins SD, Klamer TW, Parteka J J et al A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects. Surgery 1983; 94:392-398.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com