Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Sağlıklı kişilerde cinsiyetler arasında görsel uyarılmış potansiyellerin karşılaştırılması

The comparison of visual evoked potentials between sexes in healthy person

Journal Name:

  • İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1995

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Some authors reported that there are hemispheric asymmetric visual evoked potentials between sexes. The other reports suggested that this asymmetry is not caused by sex but is caused by difference in vigilance, IQ and maturation of brain. We aimed to search this issue in two groups same in vigilance age and IQ. We used hemifield pattern reversal evoked potentials and compared PI00 and N75 waves amplitude and latencies between sexes. We did not find any statistically significant difference. [Journal of Turgut Özal Medical Center 2(2): 169-171,1995]
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Normal kişilerden elde edilen görsel uyarılmış potansiyellerde cinsiyet vijilans, IQ ve beyin maturasyonuna bağlı farklılıkların olabileceğini belirten araştırmalar vardır. Bu çalışmamızda 1Q vijilans ve yaş açısından homojen olarak kabul edilebilecek 11 kız ve 11 erkek Tıp Fakültesi son sınıf öğrencisinde, dama taşı patterni ile görsel uyarılmış potansiyeller çalışıldı. Değerlendirmeye aldığımız P100, N75 dalgalarının latens ve amplitüdlerinde cinsiyetler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. [Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi 2(2): 169-171,1995]
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-saglikli-kisilerde-cinsiyetler-arasinda-gorsel-uyarilmis-potansiyellerin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 2
169-171
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Rodin EA, Grissell JI, Gudoba RD, Zachary G. Relationship of EEG background rhythms to photic evoked responses.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophsiol 1965,19:301-4.
2. Buchsbaum MS, Henkin RJ Christiansen RL. Age and sex differences in averaged evoked responses in a normal population with observation on patients with gonadal dysgenesis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974;37: 137-44.
3. Rhodes LE, Dustman RE, Beck EC. The visual evoked response; a comparison of bright and dull children, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1969;27:364-72.
4. Cohn NB, Kircher J, Emmerson RY, Dustman RE. Pattern reversal evoked potentials: Age, sex and hemispheric asymmetry. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;62:399-405.
5. Grabowska A, Nowicka A, Szatkowska I. Asymmetry in visual evoked potentials to grating registered in two hemispheres of the human brain. Acta Neurobiol Exp Warsz 1992;52(4):239-49.
6. Mecacci L, Spinelli D, Viggiano MP. The effect of visual field size on hemispheric asymmetry of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. Int J Neurosci 1990;51(l-2): 141-51.
7. McGlone J. Sex differences in human brain asymmetry : A critical survey. Behav Brain Sci 1980;3:215-63.
8. Dustman RE, Emmerson RY, Ruhling RO, Shearer DE, Steinhaus LA, Johnson SC, et al. Age and fitness effects on EEG, ERPs, visual sensitivity, and cognition. Neurobiol Aging 1990;11(3): 193-200.
9. Snyder EW, Dustman RE, Shearer DE. Pattern reversal evoked potential amplitudes: Life span change. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981;52:429-34.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com