Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Lumbar Spinal Stenozda Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Bulguları

Computed tomography findings in lumbar spinal stenosis

Journal Name:

  • İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1998

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
21 patients having lumbar spinal stenosis were evaluated clinically and with computed tomography. In computed tomographic evaluation of the lumbar vertebrae, the dural sac transverse area, the width of lateral recesses and ligamentum flavums were measured. The herniated disks compressing the central canal and other causes of spinal stenosis were investigated. The most common computed tomography finding was disk hernia-bulging (85.7%) and narrowing of spinal canal transverse area less than 100 mm2 (85.7%). In computed tomography, instead of canal measurements, spinal stenosis should be evaluated with the shape of the spinal canal and whether there is enough space for the thecal sac and nerve roots or not. [Journal of Turgut Özal Medical Center 1998;5(1):55-59]
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Lumbar spinal stenozlu 21 hasta klinik olarak ve bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) ile incelendi. Lumbar bölge BT incelemesinde dural sak kesit alanı, lateral reses genişlikleri, ligament um flavum kalınlıkları ölçüldü, osteofitik değişiklikler, santral kanala bası yapan diskler ve diğer spinal stenoz nedenleri araştırıldı. En sık rastlanan BT bulgusu disk hernisi-bulging (%85.7) idi. Yine olguların %85.7 'sinde dural sak kesit alanının azalmış olduğu (100 mm2'nin altında) saptandı. Spinal stenoz BT'de kanal boyutları yerine kanalın şekli, tekal sak ve sinir kökleri için yeterli alanın olup olmaması ile değerlendirilmelidir. [Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi 1998;5(1):55-59]
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-lumbar-spinal-stenozda-bilgisayarli-tomografi-bulgulari.pdf
  • 1
55-59
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Dorwart RH, Vogler JB, Helms CA. Spinal stenosis. Radiol Clin North Am 1983; 21: 301-25
2. Ciricillo SF, Weinstein PR. Lumbar spinal stenosis. West J Med 1993; 158: 171-7.
3. Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F, Nordal HJ, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Clinical and radiologic features. Spine 1995; 20: 1178-86.
4. Weinstein PR, Ciricillo SF. Lumbar spinal stenosis and lateral recess syndrome. In: Rengachary SS, Wilkins RH. Principles of Neurosurgery. London. Mosby Year Book1994; 46: 1-18.
Baysal T, et al.
Computed tomography findings in lumbar spinal stenosis
5. Sabbahi MA, Khalil M. Segmental H-Reflex studies in upper and lower limbs of patients with radiculopathy. Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 223-7.
6.
clinical/radiologic therapeutic evaluation in 145 patients.
Spine 1993;18: 291-8.
7. Cox JM. Low back pain; Mechanism, Diagnosis and Treatment. Fifth ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1991:
257-308.
8. Weinstein PR. Lumbar stenosis. In: Hardy RW (ed): Lumbar disc disease. New York. Raven Press 1982: 257-76.
9. Nowakowski P, Delitto A, Erhard RE. Lumbar spinal stenosis.
Phys Ther 1996; 76: 187-90.
10. Weinstein PR. diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Neurosurg 1983; 30: 677-97.
11. Osborn AG. Nonneoplastic disorders of the spine and spinal cord. In: Osborn AG. Diagnostic Neuroradiology. First ed. St.
Louis. Mosby Year Book 1994: 840-9.
12. Lee BCP, Kazam E, Newman AD. Computed tomography of the spine and spinal cord. Radiology 1978; 128: 95-102.
13. Taveras JM, Ferrucci JT. Radiology: Diagnosis-Imaging-Intervention. 1990 J.B. Lippincott Company Philadelphia.
14. Ullrich CG, Binet EF, Sanecki MG, Kieffer SA. Quantitative
assesment of the lumbar spinal canal by Computed
Tomography. Radiology 1980; 134: 137-43.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com