Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

3448 bireyde uzak ve yakın interpupiller mesafeler: son veriler

DISTANT AND NEAR INTERPUPILLARY DISTANCE IN 3448 MALE AND FEMALE SUBJECTS: FINAL RESULTS

Journal Name:

  • İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1999

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Aim: To establish the normal standards for distant and near interpupillary distance (IPD) specific for age and sex in 3448 urban Turkish subjects from 7 to 40 years of age. Methods: Turkish male (n=1852) and female (n=1596) subjects were investigated for anatomical IPD. Subjects were divided into three age groups; 7 to 15 year-old children (mean, 10.86±2.69), 16 to 25 year-old young adults (mean, 20.57±2.88), 26 to 40 year-old adults (mean, 30.87±4.55). The normative mean values at each age for 7 to 25 year-old group were determined. The average values for IP measurements with 3d, 10th, 255th, 50th, 75h, 90th and 97th percentiles were presented for 7 to 15 year-old group. The values were compared wi h s andards derived from o her e hnic popula ions. Results: In all groups, the mean age difference between males and females was not significant. The overall anatomical FIPD is on the average 2.92 mm wider than NIPD. The male IPD were, on he average, wider han he female IPD in ei her dis ances, wi h grea er differences in he advanced ages. The FIPD and NIPD differences were significan for all ages. Mean values for IPD's in our study for both sex were found to be similar with Arabian, Hong Kong and British children, larger than those of Chinese, Black, Indian and Caucasians and smaller han hose of Mexican children and mixed European popula ion. Conclusion: Beside providing local reference standards at each age and sex, we believe ha his inves iga ion will con ribu e o norma ive IPD values used in he diagnosis of hyper-hypo elorism, various syndromes and some craniofacial deformi ies. These da a are also useful for he indus ry of op ical frames and lenses.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Yedi ile 40 yaş arasındaki 3448 kişide yaş ve cinsiyete özel uzak ve yakın in erpupiller mesafe (İPM) normal s andar larını belirlemek. Yöntem: Anatomik İPM için 1852 erkek ve 1596 kadın çalışma kapsamına alındı. Kişiler üç yaş grubuna ayrıldı; 7 ile 15 yaş arası çocuklar (ortalama yaş, 10.86±2.69), 16 ile 25 yaş arası genç erişkinler (ortalama yaş, 20.57±2.88) ve 26 ile 40 yaş arası erişkinler (ortalama yaş, 30.87±4.55). Yedi ile 25 yaş arasında her yaş için ayrı ayrı ortalama normatif değerler belirlendi. Yedi ile 15 yaş arasındaki çocuklarda ayrıca İPM'ler için 3., 10., 25., 50., 75., 90. ve 97. persentiller hesaplandı. Bizim verilerimiz diğer etnik popülasyonlardaki verilerle karşılaş ırıldı. Bulgular: Tüm gruplarda erkek ve kadınlar arasındaki yaş farkı anlamsızdı. Ortalama uzak İPM yakın İPM'den 2.92 mm daha genişti ve yaş ilerledikçe bu fark artmaktaydı. Tüm yaşlarda uzak ve yakın İPM farkları anlamlı idi. İPM ortalamalarımız her iki cinsiyette de Arap, Hong Kong ve İngiliz çocuklarındaki sonuçlarla benzer; Çin, Hin t, Siyah ve Kafkasyalı çocuklardan daha büyük; Meksikalı ve karışık Avrupa çocuklarınkinden ise daha küçük idi. Sonuç: Her yaş ve cinsiye için yerel referans s andar ları sağlaması yanında biz bu çalışmanın hiper-hipo elorizm, değişik sendromlar ve bazı kraniofasiyel deformi elerin anısında ka kı sağlayacağı inancındayız. Bu veriler ayrıca gözlük çerçevesi ve lens sek öründe de kullanışlı olacak ır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-3448-bireyde-uzak-yakin-interpupiller-mesafeler-son-veriler.pdf
  • 2
84-91
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Pryor HB. Objective measurements of interpupillary distance. Pediatrics 1969;44:973-7.
2. Fledelius HC, Stubgaard M. Changes in eye position during growth and adult life as based on exophthalmometry, interpupillary distance and orbital distance measurements. Acta Ophthalmol 1986;64:481-6.
3. Murphy WK, Laskin DM, Richmond MS. Intercanthal and interpupillary distance in the black population. Oral Surg Oral Med Pathol 1990;69:676-80.
4. Singh JR, Banerjee S. Normal values for interpupillary, inner canthal and outer canthal distances in an Indian population. Hum Hered 1983;33:326-8.
5. Quant JR, Woo GC. Normal values of eye position in the Chinese population of Hong Kong. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:152-8.
6. Osuobeni EP, Faden FK. Interpupillary distance of females of Arab origin. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:244-7.
7. Osuobeni EP, Al-Musa KA. Gender differences in interpupillary distance among Arabs. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:1027-30.
8. Kaimbo DK, Kayembe D. Orbital measurements in Zairian children. Inner canthal, outer orbital, inter-pupillary distances and proptosis. J Fr Ophtalmol 1994;17:496-500.
9. Okanlawon AO, Ejiwunmi AB, Rosanwo MO, Ojo OO. Standards of craniofacial dimention for an African Population. East Afr Med J 1990;67:254-9
10. Anderson AL. Accurate clinical means of measuring intervisual axis distance. Arch Ophthalmol 1954;52:349-52.
11. Daniel WW. Biostatistics. A foundation for analysis in the health science. John Wiley ) Sons, USA 1987;207-18.
12. DeMyer W. The median cleft face syndrome. Neurology
1967;17:961-71.
13. Lakshminarayana P, Janardhan K, David HS. Anthropometry for syndromology. Indian J Pediatr 1991;58:253-8.
90
Turgu
t Özal Tıp Merkez i Derg i s i 6(2):1999
Everekl i oğlu et al
14. Brückner R, Batschelet E, Hugenschmidt F. The basal longitudinal study on aging: Ophthalmogerontological research results. Doc Ophthalmol 1987;64:235-310.
15. Chen AH, O'Leary DJ. Changes in the interpupillary distance with the age and its effect on the near fusion free position. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1997;25:6-8.
16. Feningold M, Bossert WH. Normal values for selected physical parameters: an aid to syndrome delineation. The National Foundation, March of Dimes; New York 1974;10:1-9.
17. Juberg RC, Sholte FG, Touchstone WJ. Normal values for Intercanthal Distances of 5-to11-Year,Old American Blacks. Pediatrics 1975;55:431-6.
18. Lucas WP, Pryor HB. Range and standard deviation of certain physical measurements in healthy children. J Pediatr 1935;6:533,45.
19. Waardenburg PJ. A new syndrome combining developmental anomalies of the eyelids, eyebrow and nose root with pigmentery defects of the iris and head hair with congenital deafness. Am J Hum Genet 1951;3:195-253.
20. Liu KJ, Zhang AQ, Zhao TL. Report of the normal physiological values of the external eye of children. Chin J Ophthalmol
1986;22:230-1
21. Kaye J, Obsfeld H. Anthropometry for children's spectacle frames. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989;9:293-8.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com