Buradasınız

BACTERIOLOGY OF ANTRUM IN CHRONIC MAXILLARY SINUSITIS

Kronik Maksiller Sinüzitiste Antrum Mikrobiyolojisi

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
There have been many investigations about the microbial aetiology of chronic sinusitis with great variations. Because the culture and the antibiogram tests in the management of the patients with sinusitis are impractical in daily life, selection of antibiotic drugs is done empirically. Keeping this fact in mind, the results of these tests should be disclosed more often on a reliable method. In this study, twenty-five sinus cultures were obtained from the patients with chronic maxillary sinusitis with pathological verification After treating the nares and inferior meatus with povidone iodine solution, intranasal inframeatal antrostomy was performed. Separate transport mediums specially prepared for aerobic and anaerobic collections were used. Following differentiation of the microorganisms, antibiotic sensitivity tests were determined. Biopsy specimens of maxillary sinus mucosa, obtained peroperatively were studied under the light microscope. Aerobic bacteria were recovered in seventeen cases(68%), whereas there were fifteen anaerobes isolated(60%). Mixed infections were seen in seven patients. The most common isolates were anaerobic streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, alpha-haemolytic streptococci and bacteroid species. It was noticed that the aminoglycoside antibiotics were the most effective drugs in tests.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kronik sinüzitin mikrobiyal etyolojisi hakkında pek çok araştırma vardır ve bunların arasında da derin farklar göze çarpmaktadır. Günlük hayatta sinüzit tanısı alan hastaların tedavisinin planlanmasında kültür ve antibiyogram testlerinin yapılması pratik değildir. Bu nedenle de antibiyotik seçimi ampirik o/arak yapılmaktadır. Bu gerçekten hareketle, bu tür hastaların kültür ve antibiyogramları daha güvenilir metodlarla yapılmalı ve sık olarak ortaya konmalıdır. Bu çalışmada histopatolojik olarak doğrulanmış kronik maksiller sinüzitli hastalardan yirmibeş sinüs kültürü elde edildi. Bu hastalara, nares bölgesi ve nazal kaviteleri povidon iyodür solüsyonuyla silindikten sonra intranazal inframeatal antrostomi uygulandı. Maksiller sinüsten alınan kültür örnekleri aerobik ve anaerobik kültürler için farklı transport besi yerlerine ekildi. Ayrıca patolojik tanı için sinüs mukozasından biyopsi yapıldı. Mikroorganizma türlerinin tespiti sonrasında antibiyogram çalışmalarına geçildi. Olguların onyedisinde aerobik bakteriler bulunurken(%68), onbeşinde de anaeroplar izole edildi(%60). Yirmibeş hastanın yedisinde mikst enfeksiyon söz konusuydu. En sık rastlanılan bakteriler ise anaerobik streptokoklar, Stafilokokkus aureus, Hemofilus enfluenza, alfa-hemolitik streptokoklar ve bakteroid türleridir. Anibiyogramda en etkin grubun aminoglikozidler olması dikkat çekiciydi.
187-192

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Slavin RG. Sinusitis. J.AIIergy Clin.Immunol 1984; 712-6.
2. Palva T, Grönroos JA, Palva A. Bacteriology and Pathology of Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis.Acta Otolaryngol 1962; 54:159-75.
3. Frederich J, Braude Al. Anaerobic Infection of the Paranasal Sinuses. N.Engl.Med 1974; 290:135-7.
4. Evans FOJr, Sydnor JB, Moore WEC et al. Sinusitis of Maxillary Antrum. N Eng J Med 1975; 293:735-9.
5. Kinnman J, Won LC, Hahm Pork S. Bacterial Flora in Chronic Purulent Maxillary Sinusitis. Acta Otolaryngol 1967; 64:37-44.
6. Brook I. Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacterial Flora of Normal Maxillary Sinuses. Laryngoscope 1981;91:372-6.
7. Almadori G, Bastianini L, Bistoni F .et al. Microbial Flora of Nose and Paranasal Sinuses in Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis. Rhinology 1986; 24:254-64.
8. Karma P, Jokippi L, Sipila P et al. Bacteria in Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis. Arch. Otolaryngol 1979; 105:386-90.
9. Erkan M, Aslan T, Özcan M, Koç N. Bacteriology of Antrum in Adults with Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis. Laryngoscope 1994; 104:321-4.
10. Carenfelt C, Lunberg C, Nord CE, Wretling B. Bacteriology of Maxillary Sinusitis in Relation to Quality of the Retained Secretion.Acta Otolaryngol 1978; 86:298-302.
11. Lund VJ. Inferior Meatal Antrostomy: Fundamental Considerations of Design and Function. J.Laryngol.Otol.SuppI 1988;9:30-3.
Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi 6(3): 1999
191
Dereköy et al
12. Maisel RH, Kimberley BP. Treatment of Chronic Sinusitis with Open Drainage and Cefaclor. Am J Otolaryngoll988;15:l-18.
13. Chapnik JS, Bavh MC. Bacterial and Fungal Infections of the Maxillary Sinus. Otolaryngol Clin N Amer 1976;9:43-54.
14. Brook I, Controni G, Rodriguez WJ. Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacteriology of Sinusitis in Children. Curr Chemother Infect Dis 1980;11:882-5.
15. Brook I. Bacteriology of Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis in Adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98:426-8.
16. Greval RS, Khurana S, Shobha R, Sharma SK. Anaerobic Infection in Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis. Indian J Med Sci 1993;47:201-3.
17. Cauwenberg PB, Mijnsbrugge AMV, Ingels KJAO. The Microbiology of Acute and Chronic Sinusitis and Otitis Media: A review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 250: S3-S6.
18. Jeppesen F, Ilium P. Concentration of Ampicillin in Antral Mucosa Following Administration of Ampicillin Sodium and Pivampicillin. Acta Otolaryngol 1972;73:428-32.
19. Axelsonn A, Brorson JE. The Concentration of Antibiotics in Sinus Secretions: Ampicillin, Cephradine and Erythromycin cinestolate. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1974; 83:323-331.
20. Koltai PJ, Maisel BO, Goldstein JC. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis. Laryngoscope 1985;95:34-7.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com