Journal Name:
- Intangible Capital
Publication Year:
- 2010
Author Name | University of Author |
---|---|
- 2
- English
REFERENCES
ACOSTA, J.; MODREGO A. (2001). Public financing of cooperative R&D projects in Spain: the concerted projects under the national R&D plan. Research Policy, 30:625-641.
ALMUS, M.; CZARNITZKI D. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business & Economic Statistic, 21:226-236. doi:10.1198/073500103288618918
ARVANITIS, S.; HOLLENSTEIN, H.; LENZ S. (2002). The effectiveness of government promotion of advances in manufacturing technologies (ATM): An economic analysis based on Swiss micro data. Small Business Economics, 19:321-340. doi:10.1023/A:1019606131837
ARVANITIS, S.; KEILBACH M. (2002). Econometric models: Microeconometric models. In: European Commission, editor. RTD Evaluation Toolbox, IPTS Technical Report Series.
BECKER, S.; ICHINO A. (2002). The estimation of average treatment effects base on propensity score. The Stata Journal, 2:358-377.
BLANES, J.; BUSOM I. (2004). Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spain´s manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 33:1459-1476. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.006
BRANSTETTER, L.; SAKAKIBARA M. (1998). Japanese Research Consortia: A microeconometric analysis of industrial policy. The Journal of Industrial Economics, XLVI:207-234.
BRANSTETTER, L.; SAKAKIBARA M. (2002). When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel date. The American Economic Review, 92:143-159. doi:10.1257/000282802760015649
BUSOM, I. (1993). Los Proyectos de I+D de las empresas: un análisis empírico de algunas de sus características. Revista Española de Economía, Monográfico: Investigación y Desarrollo:39-65. doi:10.1080/10438590000000006
Intangible Capital, 2010 – 6(2): 272-299 – ISSN: 1697-9818
doi:10.3926/ic.2010.v6n2.p272-299
Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: A comparative analysis according to firm size 296
L Herrera – E Bravo-Ibarra
BUSOM, I. (2000). An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Economics of Innovations and New Technology, 9:111-148.
CALLEJON M, GARCÍA-QUEVEDO J. (2005). Public subsidies to business R&D: Do they stimulate private expenditures?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23:279-293. doi:10.1068/c0428
CAMISÓN, C.; LAPIEDRA-ALCAMÍ, R.; SEGARRA-CIPRÉS, M.; BONRONAT-NAVARRO, M. (2004). A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25:22-40.
CARMICHAEL, J. (1981). The effects of mission-oriented public R&D spending on private industry. Journal of Finance, 36:617-627. doi:10.2307/2327522
COHEN, W. (1995). Empirical studies of innovative activity. In: Stoneman P, editor. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press,. pp 182-264.
COHEN, W.; KLEPPER S. (1996). A reprise of size and R&D. The Economic Journal, 106:925-951. doi:10.2307/2235365
COHEN, W.; LEVIN R. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In: Schmalensee E, Willig E., editors. Handbook of Industrial Organization, New York: North Holland,. pp. 1059-1107.
CZARNITZKI, D.; FIER A. (2002). Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment? Evidence from the German service sector. Applied Economics Quarterly, 48:1-25.
CZARNITZKI, D.; LICHT G. (2006). Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy. Economics in Transition, 14:101-131. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00236.x
DAVID, P.; HALL, B.; TOOLE A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29:407-529.
Intangible Capital, 2010 – 6(2): 272-299 – ISSN: 1697-9818
doi:10.3926/ic.2010.v6n2.p272-299
Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: A comparative analysis according to firm size 297
L Herrera – E Bravo-Ibarra
DEHEJIA, R.; WAHBA S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84:51-161. doi:10.1162/003465302317331982
DUGUET, E. (2003). Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D?: Evidence from France using propensity score methods for non-experimental data. Review d’Economie Politique, 114:263-292
GONZÁLEZ, X.; JAUMANDREU, J.; PAZÓ C. (2005) Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness. RAND Journal of Economics, 36:930-950.
GONZÁLEZ, X.; PAZÓ C. (2008) Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?. Research Policy, 37:371-389.
HEIJS, J. (2003). Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: The case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D. Research Policy, 32:445-461. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00023-9
HEIJS, J. (2005). Identification of firms supported by technology policies: The case of Spanish low interest credits. Science and Public Policy, 32:219-230. doi:10.3152/147154305781779515
HERRERA, L.; HEIJS J. (2007). Difusión y adicionalidad de las ayudas públicas a la innovación. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 44:177-197.
HERRERA, L.; NIETO M. (2008). The national innovation policy effect according to firm location. Technovation, 28:540-550. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.009
INE. (2003) Estadísticas sobre las Actividades en Investigación Científica y Desarrollo. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Madrid.
KLETTE, TJ.; MOEN J.(1998). R&D investment responses to R&D subsidies: A theoretical analysis and econometric evidence. Working Paper, NBER Summer Institute, July..
Intangible Capital, 2010 – 6(2): 272-299 – ISSN: 1697-9818
doi:10.3926/ic.2010.v6n2.p272-299
Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: A comparative analysis according to firm size 298
L Herrera – E Bravo-Ibarra
LACH, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. The Journal of Industrial Economics, L:369–390. doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00182
LAFORET, S. (2008) Size, strategic, and market orientation affects on innovation. Journal of Business Research, 61:753-764. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.08.002
METCALFE, S.; GEORGHIOU L. (1998). Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy. STI Review, 22:75-100.
NELSON R. (1984). High-technology policies: A five-nation comparison. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research,.
NELSON, R.; WINTER S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,.
NOOTEBOOM, B. (1994). Innovation and diffusion in small firms: theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6:327-347. doi:10.1007/BF01065137
PAVITT, K. (1984) Sectorial patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 3:343-373. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
PAVITT, K.; ROBSON, M.; TOWNSEND J. (1989). Technological accumulation diversification and organisation in UK companies: 1945-1983. Management Science, 35:81-99. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.1.81
ROSENBAUM, P.; RUBIN D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effect. Biometrika, 70:41-55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
TEUBAL, M. (2002). What is the systems perspective to innovation and technology policy (ITP) and how can we apply it to developing and newly industrialized economics? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12:233-257. doi:10.1007/s00191-002-0113-0
URZAY J. (2001). El efecto incentivador de las ayudas públicas a la innovación. Papeles de Economía Española, 89:297-307.
Intangible Capital, 2010 – 6(2): 272-299 – ISSN: 1697-9818
doi:10.3926/ic.2010.v6n2.p272-299
Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: A comparative analysis according to firm size 299
L Herrera – E Bravo-Ibarra
VERSPAGEN, B. (2005). Innovation and Economic Growth. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and R. Nelson, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 487-513.
WALLSTEN, S. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the small business innovation research program. RAND Journal of Economics, 13:82-100. doi:10.2307/2601030