Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Envisioning the Changes in Teaching Framed by the National Science Education Standards-Teaching Standards

Envisioning the Changes in Teaching Framed by the National Science Education Standards-Teaching Standards

Journal Name:

  • International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The National Science Education Standards (NRC, 1996) have been one of the leading reformed documents in the U.S. since its release. It has served as a foundation for all state standards and has supported the development of the newest standards documents recently released in the U.S. (i.e., Achieve Inc., 2013; NRC 2012). One of the most important contributions this document has made is in the area of teaching, as it puts forth explicit standards for teaching science grounded framed by constructivism. These standards are quite different than what has traditionally been found in U.S. schools. This article examine each of the teaching standards outlined in the NSES, 1) to better explain the bases and importance of the teaching standard and specific less/more emphasis indicators found in the Changing Emphasis table in the teaching standards, before 2) current science education research that is forming the foundations of each of the standards moving forward is shared. Finally, examination of each teaching standard in the article concludes with exemplar vignettes to provide a vision for the enactment of each standard in the context of teachers’ and students’ everyday classroom and school experiences.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_170075_3_pp_162-183.pdf
  • 1
162-183
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice:
Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.
Achieve Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards. www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-sciencestandards.
Ackerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activitybased approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.
Adamson, A.E., Banks, D., Burtch, M., Cox III, F., Judson, E., Turley, J.B., Benford, R. & Lawson, A.E.
(2003). Reformed Undergraduate Instruction and Its Subsequent Impact on Secondary School Teaching
Practice and Student Achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 939-958.
Aguiar, O., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2010). Learning from and Responding to Students' Questions: The
Authoritative and Dialogic Tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 174-93.
Akcay, H. & Yager, R. E. (2010). The Impact of a Science/Technology/Society Teaching Approach on Student
Learning in Five Domains. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 602-611.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. New York:
Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Author,
Washington.
Amann, G. (2005). Exploring Physics in the Classroom. AAPT Press: College Park, MD.
Austin, A., Campa, H., Pfund, C., Gillian-Daniel, D., Mathieu, R., & Stoddart, J. (2009). Preparing STEM
doctoral students for future faculty careers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 83-95.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com