Buradasınız

Fault Diagnosis in Process Control Valve Using Artificial Neural Network

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
As modern process industries become more complex, the importance to detect and identify the faulty operation of pneumatic process control valves is increasing rapidly. The prior detection of faults leads to avoiding the system shutdown, breakdown, raw material damage and etc. The proposed approach for fault diagnosis comprises of two processes such as fault detection and fault isolation. In fault diagnosis, the difference between the system outputs and model outputs called as residuals are used to detect and isolate the faults. But in the control valve it is not an easy process due to inherent nonlinearity. The particular values of five measurable quantities from the valve are depend on the commonly occurring faults such as Incorrect supply pressure, Diaphragm leakage and Actuator vent blockage. The correlations between these parameters from the fault values for each operating condition are learned by a multilayer BP Neural Network. The parameter consideration is done through the committee of Development and Application of Methods for Actuator Diagnosis in Industrial Control Systems (DAMADICS). The simulation results using MATLab prove that BP neural network has the ability to detect and identify various magnitudes of the faults and can isolate multiple faults. In addition, it is observed that the network has the ability to estimate fault levels not seen by the network during training.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
138-144

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] M. Karpenko, N. Sepehri “A Neural Network Based Fault Detection And Identification Scheme For Pneumatic Process
Control Valves” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and
Automation, pp. 166-171, July 29 –Augest 1 2001.
[2] Beard R V: Failure accommodation in linear system through selfreorganization, PhD thesis, MIT, Massachusetts, USA, pp.
21-25, 1971.
[3] Clark RN, Fosth DC and Walton WM, “Detecting instrument malfunctions in control systems,” IEEE Transactions on
Aerospace and Electronic Systems AES-11, pp. 465-473, 1975.
[4] Basseville M and Nikiforov I: Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application, Information and System Science.
Prentice Hall, New York, pp. 56-78, 1993.
[5] Cordier MO, Dague P, Dumas M, Levy F, Montmain J, Staroswiecki M and Traves-Massuyes L , “ AI and automatic control
approaches of modelbased diagnosis: Links and underlying hypothesis,” IEEE Proceedings of the 4th IFAC Symposium
SAFEPROCESS’00, Budapest, Hungary, vol. 1, pp. 274- 279,2000.
[6] Fukai Deng, Erqing Zhang, Qunli Shang, Shan-en Yu and Yifang He, “Application of BP Neural Network in Faults Diagnosis
of Process Valve Actuator,” Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Volume 107, Computer, Informatics, Cybernetics and
Applications, Part 8, pp. 793-801,2012.
[7] DAMADICS Benchmark Definition, Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Automatic Control and Robotics Team
with cooperation with UPC, Preliminary, ver. 1.0 March 17, pp. 01-20, 2002.
[8] Michał Bartyś: How to build a benchmark problem for FDI evaluation, DAMADICS Vacation School Technical University
of Lisbon, pp. 01-15, August 31- September1 2001.
[9] Michał Bartyś, Michał Syfert: Using Damadics Actuator Benchmark Library (DABLib), Final, ver. 1.22, pp. 01-20, April 26,
2002.
[10] Vasile Palade, Cosmin Danut Bocaniala and Lakhmi Jain (Eds): Computational Intelligence in Fault Diagnosis, Springer-
Verlag London Limited, pp. 01-37, 2006.
[11] Ben Krose and Patrick van der Smagt: An Introduction to Neural Networks, The University of Amsterdam, Eighth edition,
pp. 33-38, November 1996.
[12] Marcu T, Mirea L, Frank P.M, “Development of dynamic neural networks with application to observer-based fault
detection and isolation,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, pp. 547-570, 1999.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com