Buradasınız

Land Ownership and its Impact on Adoption of Agroforestry Practices among Rural Households in Kenya: A Case of Busia County

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (Original Language): 
The practice of agroforestry can be much beneficial in the African communities where there are harsh environmental conditions, low technologies of agricultural production, fragmented land tenure system, unreliable livelihoods and chronic food insecurity. This paper is an outcome of a descriptive survey study that was conducted in Nambale division, Busia County in Kenya, which partly examined the factors influencing adoption of agroforestry practices among rural households. The adoption of agroforestry has not been very successful due to land ownership and land rights aspects that have adversely affected its adoption to the larger extent. In Kenya, land ownership remains exceedingly skewed in many rural parts of the country. The authors argue that when land ownership is extremely unequal, agroforestry activities and its growth delivers fewer paybacks for the poor rural households. Land tenure problems have been exacerbated by continuous fragmentation of land, land inheritance, gender imbalance in land ownership and the rights to land use. The paper concludes that the decision to adopt agroforestry was partly influenced by land and tree tenure, size of land and gender equity (women’s rights to property and recognition of co-ownership). Additionally, rural households’ investments in agroforestry increase with increasing in land tenure. The important policy recommendation made is that laws affecting adoption of agroforestry practices should be updated and harmonized in-order to achieve the 10% tree cover and for farmers and households to achieve the maximum benefits of agroforestry.
552
559

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] T. Otsuki, Estimating Agroforestry Effects on Agricultural Productivity in Kenya: An Application of a Treatment Effect
Model, Osaka University, Mimeographed, 2010.
[2] I. Boateng, The Impact of Agroforestry on the Livelihood of Rural Farming Households: A Case Study of Selected
Communities of offinso, Afigya Sekyere and Atwima Districts, 2008.
[3] C. Zinkhan, & D. Wear, Development of a Multi Attribute Utility Approach for Evaluating Potential Agroforestry Systems
in the South, Study Plan for USFS and Campbell University Cooperative Agreement, 1992.
[4] W. Dunn, “Benefit-Cost Analysis of Fuel wood Management Using Native Alder in Ecuador,” Agroforestry Systems 11,
pp. 125-139, 1990.
[5] FAO, “Tree Growing by Rural People. Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN,” FAO Forestry paper 64. Rome: pp.
26-29, 1986.
[6] P. Francis, “Land Tenure Systems and Agricultural Innovation. The Case of Alley Farming in Nigeria. Land Use Policy,”
Butterworth and Co, pp. 305-319, 1987.
[7] F. A. Caveness, & W.B. Kurtz, “Agroforestry Adoption and Risk Perception by Farmers in Senegal,” Agroforestry System
21, pp. 11-25, 1993.
[8] P. Mbote, “The Land has Its Owners! Gender Issues in Land Tenure under Customary Law,” International Land Coalition
Workshop, Nairobi, 2005.
[9] L. Fortmann, “The Tree Tenure Factor in agroforestry with particular reference to Africa,” Agroforestry Systems 2, pp.
229-251, 1985.
[10] J. B. Raintree, Socioeconomic Attributes of Trees and Tree Planting Practices, FAO, Rome, 1991.
[11] A.S. Kolade, Some Tenure and Legal Aspects of Agroforestry, In: J.K. Jackson, (Eds), Social, Economic and Institutional
Aspects of Agroforestry, The United Nation University Tokyo, Japan, pp. 20–25, 1984.
[12] G. Benneh, “Communal Land Tenure and the Journal of Administration Overseas,” Oxfords University Press, New York,
USA, 15(1), pp. 26-33, 1976.
[13] G. Feder, R. E. Just, & D. Zilberman, “Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey,” Economic
Development and Cultural Change, 33, pp. 255-298, 1985.
[14] P. O. Obunde. C. M. Mbogo, W. Oluoch-Kosura, & A. W. Kamoni, Effects of Land Tenure on Agricultural Productivity and
the Environment: a Case Study of Suba and Laikipia districts, IFPRI Eastern Africa Food Policy Network Report 7.
Washington, D.C: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2004.
[15] Busia District Development Plan, 1997-2001.
[16] O. Mugenda, & A. Mugenda, Research methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, Nairobi African Centre for
African Studies, 1999.
[17] N. A. Chavangi & J. B. Raintree, “Agroforestry Potentials and Land Tenure Issues in Western Kenya. Land, Trees and
Tenure,” Proceedings of an international workshop on tenure issues in agroforestry, Jointly published with Land Tenure
Center (LTC), Madison, Wisconsin, USA; International Council for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya, pp.
193-199, 1987.
[18] E. Kinuthia, G. Owuor, W. Nguyo, A. Kalio & D. Kinambuga, “Factors Influencing Participation and Acreage Allocation in
Tree Planting Program, A Case of Nyeri District, Kenya,” Agricultural Science Research Journal, 1(6), pp. 129-133, 2011.
[19] O.C. Ajayi, S. Franzel, E. Kuntashula, & F. Kwesiga, “Adoption of Improved Fallow Soil Fertility Management Practices In
Zambia, Synthesis and emerging issues,” Agroforestry Systems, 59 (3), pp. 317-326, 2003.
[20] R. Jera & O. Ajayi, “Logistic Modeling of Smallholder Livestock Farmers’ Adoption of Tree-Based Fodder Technology in
Zimbabwe,” Agrekon, 47: pp. 379-392, 2008.
[21] P. Dewees, Social Economic Incentives for Smallholder Tree Growing: A case study from Muranga District Kenya, 1995.
[22] B. Van Gelder & P. Kerkholf, “The agroforestry survey in Kakamega District. Kenya Woodfuel Development Programme,”
working paper No. 3, Nairobi, Kenya. Workshop held in Arusha, Tanzania. The African Academy of Sciences (AAS), pp.
156-170, 1984.
[23] P. Collier, “Contractual Constraints on Labour Exchange in Rural Kenya,” International Labor Review 128, pp. 745–768,
1989.
[24] D. E. Mercer, and F. Hyde “The Economics of Land-use Systems,” ICRAF’s multi-Disciplinary approach to diagnose landuse
problems and the potentials and design of Agroforestry technologies to overcome identified constraints, ICRAF,
Nairobi, Kenya, 1992.
[25] G. Zenebe, A. Mekonnen, M. Kassie, G. Köhlin, Household Tree Planting in Tigrai, Northern Ethiopia Tree Species,
Purposes, and Determinants Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series, 2010.
Agnes Mugure, Peter Gutwa Oino, and Benard Mwori Sorre
ISSN : 2028-9324 Vol. 4 No. 3, Nov. 2013 559
[26] P. Thangata, Resource Poor Farmers’ Perception of Agroforestry Practices-A Case Study of Malawi, University of
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 1996.
[27] W. Negatu, & A. Parikh, “The impact of perception and other factors on the adoption of agricultural technology in the
Moret and Jiru Woreda (District) of Ethiopia,” Agricultural Economics, 21(2), pp. 205-216, 1999.
[28] P. Bonnard, & S. Scherr, “Within Gender Differences in tree management: Is Gender Distinction a Reliable Concept?,”
Agroforestry Systems, 25, pp. 71–93, 1994.
[29] D. Phiri, S. Franzel, P. Mafongoya, I. Jere, R. Katanga, and S. Phiri, Who is Using the New Technology? A Case Study of
Wealth Ranking and Improved Tree Fallows in Eastern Province, Zambia, AFRENA Report, ICRAF, Nairobi, 1999.
[30] P. Nair, An Introduction to Agroforestry, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.
[31] J. Abbas, Gender Asymmetries in Intra-household Resource Allocation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Some Policy Implications for
Land and Labour Productivity: Models, Methods and Policy, Baltimore, M.D: Johns Hopkins University Press for the
International Food Policy Research Institute, 1997.
[32] C. Biggelaar, Farmer Experimentation and Innovation. A Case Study of Knowledge Generation Processes in Agroforestry
Systems in Rwanda, Community Forestry Case Study No. 12, FAO, Rome, 1996.
[33] C.S. Simmons, R.T. Walker & C.H. Wood, “Tree Planting by small producers in the tropics: A Comparative Study of Brazil
and Panama,” Agroforest Syst 56: 89-105, 2002.
[34] K. F. Wiersum, “Farmer Adoption of Contour Hedgerow Inter-cropping, A Case Study from East Indonesia,” Agroforest
Syst, 27:163-182, 1994.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com