Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

DETERMINING INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION IN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND THE RELATION WITH MOTIVATION

Journal Name:

  • International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The main aim of this research is behaviors and motivations of the students on the instructor’s social, physical and instructional attractiveness. This research is a descriptive work. 258 students (133 female and 125 male) who studied in 2008-2009 term at Anadolu University Communication Sciences Faculties Journalism, Cinema and Television, Public Relations, Advertising and Communication departments participated in the research. The instructor’s social, physical and instructional attractions and motivations were determined by using 5-point Likert scale. The findings of this research will be additions for determining and arguing the instructor’s responsibilities, besides educational ones as a communication director, for taking the students’ participation and success levels to a higher degree. Existing perceptions of the students on interpersonal attraction will be introduced in this research. The participants are students enrolled in the courses of two professors, two associate professors, two assistant professors and two lecturers who are the staff of Communication Sciences Faculties and in both genders.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-determining-interpersonal-attraction-educational-environment-and-relation-motivation.pdf
  • 1
47-56
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

DeVito, J.A.(1989). The Interpersonal Comunication Book (5th).New York: Harper&Row Publishers.
Dönmez, A. (1987). Bazı kişilerarası ilişki durumlarını algılama ve değiştirme isteğinde cinsiyet farkı. Retrieved
from http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/ 40/518/6477.pdf in Jan 27, 2009.
Duran, R.L. & Kelly, L. (1988). The influence of communicative competence on perceived task, social and
physical attraction. Communation Quarterly, 36, 41-49.
Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation. Human Communication Research, 26, 264-291.
Ergin, A., & Birol, C. (2000). Eğitimde iletişim. Ankara: Anı.
Gökdağ, R. (2004). Kişilerarası çekicilik ve yakın ilişkiler. Sosyal Psikoloji. (Ed:Sezen Ünlü). Eskişehir:Anadolu
Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley:1958.
Jakson, L.A., Hunter, J.E., & Hodge, C.N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A metaanalytic reviev. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 108-122.
Kaypakoğlu, S. (2008). Kişilerarası iletişim: Cinsiyet farklılıkları, güç ve çatışma. İstanbul: Derin Yayınları.
McCroskey, J.C., & McCain, T.A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41,
261-266.
Secord, P.F. & Backman, C.W. (1974). Social psychology. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.
Travis, E.L. & Giuliano, T.A. (2007). Classroom crushes: An exploration of student-instructor attraction. Retrieved
from
http://209.85.129.132/search?q=cache:EpwGVNPTR0QJ:www.
southwestern.edu/academics/studentworks/docs/psychologyA.ppt+teacher+attraction+scale&hl=tr&ct=clnk&c
d=6&gl=tr in Dec 18, 2008.
Turunç, B. (2008). Kişilerarası çekicilik. Retrieved from
http://www.tavsiyeediyorum.com/makale_684.htm in July 2, 2009.
Webster, M. & J.E. Driskell. (1983). Beauty as status. American Journal of Sociology ,89, 140-65.
Wheeless, L.R., Frymier, A. B., & Thompson, C.A. (1992). A comparison of verbal output and receptivity in
relation to attraction and communication satisfaction in interpersonal relationships. Communication Quarterly,
40, 102-115.
Zanden J.W.V. (1987). Social psychology. (4th Ed.) USA:McGraw Hill.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com