Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

THE MEETING LEVEL OF STUDENTS' REQUISITIONS FROM SCHOOL AS A LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Journal Name:

  • International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this research is to determine meeting level of student requests for teaching-learning process, physical environment and social activities of the school, called learning environment. In this descriptive research, 30 item- “Student Aspirations from School” were used as a means of collecting data. The sample of the research is consist of 904 6, 7 and 8 graders from the primary schools in the city center of Ankara. For statistical resolutions of the data gathered during the research; frequency distribution, mean, standard deviation, T test, single direction variance analysis were employed. Significance level for difference tests was used as p<.05. Findings show that student aspirations from school are met in general. When examined in terms of dimensions, expectations are met at the highest level in teaching and learning activities, at the lowest level in the physical environment and capacity of the school. The level to meet the needs of the female students about teaching and learning process is higher than the males’, but there is no significant difference between genders in physical environment and social activities dimensions.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-meeting-level-students-requisitions-school-learning-environment.pdf
  • 1
32-44
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Açıkalın, A. (1998). Social and Theoretical Aspects of the School Management. (Fourth Edition) Ankara, Pegem
Publishing.
Alacapınar, F. (1999). Private and Public School Teachers' Classroom Activities. (Unpublished Master Thesis),
Hacettepe University, Ankara.
Alıcıgüzel, İ. (1999). Contemporary school of Education and Training. Systems Publishing 2 Print, Istanbul.
Başar, H. (2002). Classroom Management. (Sixth Edition): Pegem A, Ankara.
Başaran, İ.E. (2000 ). Educational-Management and School Skilled. Feryal printing, Ankara.
Bickel, R.& Lange, L. (1995). Opportunities, Costs, and High School Completion in West Virginia: A replication of
Florida Research. The Journal of Educational Research, 88, 363-370.
Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2000). Understanding in Education Management System to analyze Pegem A, Ankara.
Cafoğlu Z. (1996). Total Quality Management in Education. Foundation of Hope İstanbul.
Çelik, V.(2002). Classroom management. Nobel, Ankara.
Çınkır, Ş. (2004). Effective teacher-student relationships at school. number 161 Journal of Management
Education, Ankara.
Demirel, Ö. (1995). General Teaching Methods. USEM, Ankara.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1985). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

Doğan, E. (2002). Total Quality Management in Education. Academyplus, Ankara.
Dönmez, H. (2006). Expectations of parents of students at grade, the views of primary school. Unpublished
Master's Thesis of Afyon Kocatepe University, School of Social Sciences.
Erden, M. & Altun, S. (2006). Learning Styles Morpa, Istanbul.
Gardner, J.W. (1940). The Use of The Term “Level of Aspiration.” Psychological Review, 47, 59-68.
Göksoy, S. (1997). Characteristics of the Goals of Education. Journal of Modern Education, pp: 229 Ankara,
Turkey.
Hamilton, L. C.& Seyfrit, C. L. (1993). Town-village Contrasts in Alaskan youth Aspirations. Arctic, 46, 255- 263.
Karasar, N.(2005). Scientific Research Method. (On the fifth edition), Nobel, Ankara.
Karslı, D.M. (2003). Introduction to Teaching Profession. Pegem A, Ankara.
Kemiksiz, Z.(2002). More loved by the students of a school's Properties (Ankara Province Haymana County
Case). Unpublished Master Thesis, Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences.
Lanford, D. P. & Barbar, C. ( 1999 ). Kalder Quality Management in Education Publishing No: 29, Istanbul.
MEB (2005). Primary Education Institutions Primary and Secondary Social Activities Regulation.
Memişoğlu, S.P. (1995). Individual and Society School. Function (unpublished master's thesis), Inonu University,
Malatya.
Özden, Y. (2005). Re-establish a school of translation Nobel, Ankara.

Özgüven İ.E. (1999). Contemporary Education Counseling and Guidance Pdrem, Ankara.
Pepe, K. & Mamak. H. (2002). Views on physical education and sports teachers and participation in leisure
activities between levels 7.international Sports Sciences Congress, Antalya, Turkey.
Sağlam, M. (1998). Education in the Information Age. Journal of the New Turkey (19) 794-797. Ankara, Turkey.
Sarı, M. & Cenkseven F. (2008). Elementary school students, the quality of life and self-concept.
www.insanbilimleri.com 5:2 International Journal of Human Sciences.
Sarp, N. (2000). What Should be method’s school Children?. Cukurova University Journal of Education Volume:
2 Issue: 18 h :110-116, Adana, Turkey.
Senemoğlu, N. (2004). Developmental Learning and Instruction. 10, Gazi Bookstore print, Ankara.
Şendur, P. (1999). Atmosphere, and the motive of''Class. Unpublished Master Thesis, 9 Eylul University, Izmir,
Turkey.
Şimşek, N. (1991). Use effectiveness of secondary education. Unpublished Thesis, Ankara University School
Buildings.

Varış, F. (1997). Training Program Development Alkım, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yılmaz, K. (2007). 6,7 and 8 Elementary School Feedback on Students' School Life class. Kastamonu Education
Journal Volume: 15 h :485-490. were taken on 17 April 2009 at http://www.ksef.gazi.edu.tr.
Yalın, H.İ. (2001). Instructional Technologies and Material Development. 4. Print, Nobel, Ankara, Turkey.
Yeşilyaprak, B. (2002). Educational Guidance Services 4. print Ankara, Turkey.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com