Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

METACOGNITIVE INSTRUCTION AND COOPERATIVE LEARNING- STRATEGIES FOR PROMOTING INSIGHTFUL LEARNING IN SCIENCE

Journal Name:

  • International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Teachers constantly face the challenges of finding and applying the most effective methods of instruction that could enhance academic achievement and match the diversity among students. This study aimed at examining the effects of metacognitive and cooperative learning strategies on achievement in science classrooms. A quasi-experimental design involving 3 groups namely, two treatment groups-- cooperative learning(CL) group a metacognitive instructions(MI) group and a control group, was adopted. The study lasted for 11 weeks. A researcher-made achievement test in the topic ‘Human Anatomy’ was used to measure achievement in the 3 groups. Results revealed that the metacognitive instructions were most effective in enhancing academic achievement. Multiple regression analysis shows that there is significant relationship between metacognitive awareness and achievement. The researcher recommends that metacognitive instruction be adopted regularly in the classroom so as to help students learn material more efficiently and enhance academic achievement.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-metacognitive-instruction-and-cooperative-learning-strategies-promoting-insightful-learning-science.pdf
  • 1
165-172
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bilgin, I., & Geban, O. (2006). The effect of cooperative learning approach based on conceptual change
condition on students’ understanding of chemical equilibrium concepts. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 15(1), 31-46.
Brown, A.L.(1987). Knowing when, where, and how to remember. A problem of metacognition. Advances in
instructional psychology, 1,77-165. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coutinbo, S.A.(2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition and academic success. Educate, 7(1), 39-
47.
Chang, C-Y., & Mao, S-L. (1999). The effects on students cognitive achievement when using the cooperative
learning method in earth science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 99(7), 374-379.
Everson, H. T. & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A
metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26:65-79.
Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L.B.Resick(Ed), The Nature of intelligence
(pp.231-236).Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Hartman, H.J. (2001). Metacognition in learning and instruction, theory, research and practice, Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kramarski, B., Mavrech, Z. R & Arami, M. (2004). The Effects of metacognitive instruction on solving
mathematical authentic tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 225-250.
Lippmann, R. (2005). Analyzing students’ use of metacognition during laboratory activities. Learning Individual
differences, 14, 131-137.
Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 36(1), 255–262.
Md.Yunus, A.S & Wan Ali,Z.W. (2008). Metacognition and motivation in mathematics problem solving. The
International journal of learning, 15(3) , 121-132.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 19, 460-475.
Stevens, R., & Slavin, R. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes
and social relations. American Education Research Journal, 32(2), 321-351.
Theide, K. W. Anderson, M. C. M. & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning
of texts. J. Edu. Psychol. 95, 66-73.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com