Buradasınız

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LANGUAGE LEARNING PREFERENCES AND IRANIAN EFL LEARNER’S ETHNICITY

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study examined the role of Ethnicity as a crucial factor in determining language learning preferences. Recent researches provide important support to claim that when students have the opportunity to clarify and assess their preferences in regard to definition of objectives in general and awareness of leaning preferences, their motivation, performances, and achievements will be increased and better. Since students are increasingly diverse, ethnicity has been considered as a crucial factor in determining language learning preferences. In our country, Iran, there are various ethnicities; nonetheless, English language is taught almost in the same manner for learners with different ethnical background. This study examined the impact of ethnicity (Kurd, Turk, Fars) on language learning preferences of Iranian EFL learners in order to understand weather there was any meaningful relationship between learning preferences and EFL learner’s ethnicity. To accomplish the research, a language learning preferences questionnaire with 10 items was administered to Iranian EFL learners. Subjects have been chosen according to the cluster sampling from EFL Institutes in Tehran, (Iran Mehr language institute), Tabriz and Kermanshah (Kish institute).
208-227

REFERENCES

References: 

Bada, E., & Okan, Z.(2000). Student’s language learning preferences. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4). 55-62.
Barkhuizen, G. P. (1998). Discovering learner’s perception of ESL classroom teaching/learning activities in
South African context. TESOL Quarterly, 23(3). 85-88.
Brindley, G. (1989). Needs analysis and objective setting in the Adult Migrant Education Service. Sydney: NSW
Adult Migrant Education Service.
Cornett, C.E.(1994). Teaching by principles: Interactive language teaching methodology. New York: Prentice
Hall Regents.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experiences as the source of learning and development. Englewood
Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-hall., 29 (3), 455-456.
Kooshki,E.(1384).The relationship between language learning preferences and iranian EFL learner’s
ethnicity.Unpublished MA dissertation,Islamic Azad university,Science and research branch,Tehran,Iran
Lazaraton, A. (1995). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A Progress report. TESOL Quarterly.
Leung, C., Harris, R., & Rampton, B. (1997). The idealized native speaker, reified ethnicities, and h. classroom
realities. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3). 29-32.
Mackinnon, D. W. (1978). In search for human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Creative
Education Foundation.
Negeow, K. Y. H. (1999). Online resources for parent/family involvement. ERIC Journal, 12(5), 53-54.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Newbury House.
Oxford, R., Ehrman, M. & Lavine, R. (1991). Style wars: Teacher-student style conflicts in the language
classroom. In S. Magnan, (Ed), Challenges in the 1990’s for college foreign language programs. Boston: Heinle
&Heinle.
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOLQuarterly, 21(5), 87-103.
Rex, J. (2000). The place of language in the theory of ethnicity and nationalism And migration, Maryland
University.
Richards, J. C. (2005). Materials development and research making the connection. Retrieved May 27, 2005,
from http://www.professorjacrichards.com/pdfs/materials-development-making-co....
Vasquez, J (1990). Teaching to the distinctive traits of minority students. The Clearing House. 63(7), 299-300.
Willing, K. (1987). Learning styles in adult migrant education. Sydney: NSW Adult Migrant Education Service.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com