Buradasınız

A survey of Patients and staff satisfaction with a Rapid Response Psychiatric Liaison Service in an Acute Hospital: Are Elderly Patients Easier to please?

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Background: The provision and quality of mental health services in Acute General Hospitals is a growing concern. Developing research to elicit the views of patients and staff will offer insights into service improvements. The Rapid Assessment, Interface and Discharge service (RAID) developed in an Acute General Hospital to deliver a rapid-response, 24-hour, 7-day- a- week, age-inclusive intervention was evaluated for its impact on staff satisfaction, with emphasis on staff training; and patient satisfaction, with emphasis on the differences in satisfaction between working age (under 65 years) and older adults (over 65 years). Population: Staff working in acute hospital caring for patients with mental health needs, and patients presenting to acute hospitals, requiring clinical input for their mental health. Methods: Data on patient satisfaction was collected through a structured telephone questionnaire including fixed and open-ended questions. Data related to staff satisfaction regarding the service provided was collected by a semi-structured interview administered face-to-face with staff from wards referring to the team. Training was evaluated using open-ended, Likert-scale and open-ended questionnaires. Results: Results show that the majority of working age patients rated the service as ‘good’ (42.2%), felt that the team was helpful in their care (84.8%), met their mental health needs (69.7%), and treated them with respect (96.1%). Overall, older adults rated the service as ‘excellent’ (58.3%), felt that the team was helpful in their care (85.7%), met their mental health needs (85.7%), treated them with respect (92.9%) and stated that they were seen in good time (100%). The difference in satisfaction levels between patients of working age and older patients was statistically significant. Common aspects staff rated as most helpful were advice on managing patients (12.0%), support of staff (11.0%) and advice on medication (11.0%). The majority of staff surveyed felt that their practice would be improved following the training, and rated it as either excellent (61.6%) or good (36.3%). Conclusion: This study highlighted the benefits of providing support and training to staff working directly with patients with mental health needs. It is more challenging to measure the satisfactory effect of older people who continue to give favourable answers on satisfaction questionnaires.
20
28

REFERENCES

References: 

Blenkiron, P. and Hammill, C. A. (2003). What determines patients’
satisfaction with their mental health care and quality
of life? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 79, 337-340.
Björkman, T., Hansson, L., Svensson, B. and Berglund, I. (1996).
What is important in psychiatric outpatient care? Quality
of care from the patient’s perspective. The International
Journal for Quality in Health Care. 7: 355–362
Brunero, S., Lamont, S. and Fairbrother, G. (2009). Using and
understanding consumer satisfaction to effect an improvement
in mental health service delivery. Journal of Psychiatric
and Mental Health Nursing. 16: 272–278
Care Quality Commission. (2011). Dignity and nutrition inspection
programme: National overview. Retrieved November 9,
2011, from http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/
d o c u -
ments/20111007_dignity_and_nutrition_inspection_report
_final_update.pdf
Chang, E., Hancock, K., Chenoweth, L., Jeon, Y. H., Glasson, J.,
Gradidge, K. and Graham, E. (2003). The influence of demographic
variables and ward type on elderly patients'
perceptions of needs and satisfaction during acute hospitalization.
International Journal of Nursing Practice. 3:191-201.
Cleary, M., Horsfall, J., Hunt, G. (2003), Consumer feedback on
nursing care and discharge planning. Journal of advanced
nursing. 42(3), 269-277.
Cohen, G. (1996). Age and health status in a patient satisfaction
survey. Social Science and Medicine. 42 (7): 1085-93.
Edlund, M. J., Young, A. S., Kung, F., Sherbourne, C. D., and Wells,
K. B. (2003). Satisfaction and the technical quality of mental
health care. Health Services Research, 38(2), 631-645.
Elliott, R. L., Cohen, M. D and Evans, D. L. (1995). Reforming
Georgia's mental health system. Community Mental Health
Journal. 31:413-423
Gharabawi, G., Greenspan, A., Rupnow, M. (2006). Reduction in
psychotic symptoms as a predictor of consumer satisfaction
with antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: data
from a randomised double-blind trial. BMC Psychiatry 6: 1–
7.
Great Britain. Mental Health Act 1983: Elizabeth II. Chapter 20.
1983. London: The Stationary Office.
Hansson, L. (2001). Outcome assessment in psychiatric service
evaluation. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 36:
244–248
Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health Liaison. (2012).
Guidance for commissioners of liaison mental health services to
acute hospitals. Retrieved March 9, 2012, from http://
www.rcpsych.ac.uk/PDF/JCPMH%20liaison%20(Feb%
202012).PDF
Kong, M. C., Camacho, F.T., Feldman, S. R., Anderson, R. T. and
Balkrishnan, R. (2007). Correlates of patient satisfaction
with physician visit: Differences between elderly and nonelderly
survey respondents. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
5: 62.1Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration,
Ohio State University College of Pharmacy,
Columbus, Ohio, USA
Maycock, J. A. (1991). Role of health professionals in patient education.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 50: 429-434.
Myers, M. (2000). Qualitative Research and the Generalizability
Question: Standing Firm with Proteus. The Qualitative Report.
4: 3-4.
Priebe, S. and Gruyters, T. (1995). Patients’ assessment of treatment
predicting outcome. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 21: 87–94
Rosenheck, R., Wilson, N. J., Meterko, M. (1997) Influence of
Patient and Hospital Factors on Consumer Satisfaction
with Inpatient Mental Health Treatment. Psychiatric Services,
48(12):1553–61.
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2004) Psychiatric Services to Accident
and Emergency Departments (Council Report CR118). London:
Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Royal College of Psychiatrists. (2010). Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation
Network Annual Report. Retrieved October 11, 2011,
from http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/PLAN%20Annual%
20Report%20Cycle%201%202009-2010.pdf
Ruggeri, M. (1994). Patients’ and relatives’ satisfaction with psychiatric
services: the state of art of its measurement. Social
Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 29: 212–227
Summers, M. and Happell, B.(2003). Patient satisfaction with
psychiatric services provided by a Melbourne tertiary
hospital emergency department. Journal of Psychiatric and
Mental Health Nursing. 10: 351-357.
South Staffordshire PCT. (2011). Patient and Public Experience
and Engagement: Real Accountability. Demonstrating responsiveness
and accountability. Retrieved November 7,
2011, from http://www.southstaffordshirepct.nhs.uk/
Aboutus/Docs/PCT-RealAccountability2011.pdf
Wilde, B., Larsson, G., Larsson, M., Starrin, B. (1995). The patient
evaluates health care (in Swedish). FoU Report 45: The
Care Federation.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and method (2nd
edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com