Buradasınız

SPIDER FAUNA OF BETELVINE AGRO-ECOSYSTEM IN AATTUR, TUTICORI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU, INDIA.

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Spiders are the most diverse and abundant invertebrate predators in terrestrial ecosystems. This spider fauna of a betelvine agroecosyetem was surveyed monthly by Active searching, Pitfall trap method and Net sweeping in betelvine field. They employ a remarkable diversity of predation strategies, occupy a wide array of spatial and temporal riches, and are characterized by high within habitat taxonomic diversity, exhibit taxon and guild responses to environmental change, extremely sensitive to small changes in habitat structure, including vegetation complexity, litter depth and microclimate characteristics. The faunistic survey yields 21 species of spiders belonging to 21 genera and 9 families. Araneidae was the most dominant family recording 5 species belonging to 5genera. Guild structure analysis revealed five feeding guilds, namely orb weavers and ground runners were dominant feeding guilds of the total collection.
139
151

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Patel BH, Pillai GK. Studies on spider fauna of Groundnut fields in Gujarat. India. J Bio control, 1988; 2(2): 83-88.
2. Hurd LE. Fagan WF. Cursorial spiders and succession-ageor habitat structure. Oecologia. 1992; 92: 215-221.
Review Article CODEN: IJPRNK
I Vijaya Kumar , IJPRBS, 2013; Volume 2(4): 139-151
3. Uetz GW. Habitat structure and spider foraging. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall. London.1991. 325-348
4. Hatley CL and MacMahon JA. Spider community organization: Seasonal variation and the role of vegetation architecture. Environ Entomol. 1980; 9: 632-639.
5. New TR. Untangling the web: spiders and the challenges of invertebrate conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation. 1999; 3:251-256.
6. Whitmore C, Slotow R, Crouch TE and Dippenaar-Schoeman AS. Diversity of spiders (Araneae) in a savanna reserve,Northern Province. South Africa, J
Arachnol. 2002; 30: 344-356.
7. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbölger K, Wichmann M.C. Schwager M, Jeltsch F. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr. 2004;
31: 79-92.
8. Tsai ZI, Huang PS, Tso IM. Habitat management by aboriginals promotes high spider diversity on an Asian tropical island. Ecography. 2006; 29: 84-94.
9. Jimenez-Valverde A, Lobo JM. Determinants of local spider (Araneidae and Thomisidae) species richness on a regional scale: climate and altitude vs. habitat structure. Ecol Entomol. 2007; 32:
113-122.
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
10. Blanco-Vargas E, Amat-Garcfa GD, Flörez-Daza E. Araneofauna orbitelar (Araneae: Orbiculariae) de los Andes de Colombia: comunidades en habitats bajo regeneraciön. Rev IberAracnol. 2003; 7:
189-203.
11. Coddington JA, Levi HW. Systematics and evolution of spiders (Araneae). Annu
Rev Ecol Syst. 1991; 22: 565-592.
12. D.H.Wise. Spider in ecological webs. Cambridge University Press. Cam-bridge.1993.
13. Ghavami S. Abundance of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) in olive orchards in Northern part of Iran. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science. 2006; (5): 795-799.
14. Shunmugavelu M, Saravanakumar P. Biodiversity of spiders in the betelvine agro ecosystem of Sholavanthan. National Seminar on 'Conserve the mother earth need of the hour'. Jayaraj Annapackiam Colleage for Women (Autonomous). Periyakulam. 9th and 10th March. 2009; Abstracts P 21.
15. Maloney D, Drummond FA and Alford R. Spider predation in agroecosystems: can spiders effectively control pest populations? MAFES Technical Bulletin.
2003; 190: 1-32.
16. Santos SAP, Pereira JA, Torres LM, and Nogueira AJA. Evaluation of the effect, on canopy arthropods, of two agricultural management systems to control pests in olive groves from north-east of Portugal. Chemosphere. 2007; 67,131-139.
Review Article CODEN: IJPRNK
I Vijaya Kumar , IJPRBS, 2013; Volume 2(4): 139-151
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
17. Riechert SE and Lockley T, Spiders as biological control agents. Annual Rev
Entomol. 1984; 29:299-320.
18. Tikader BK. Fauna of India. Spiders
(Thomsidae) I, 1980; (1): 1-247.
19. Sanyal AK and Tandon SK. Arachnida Faunal diversity in India. Zoolo surv India.
1998; 349-356.
20. Biswas B and Biswas K. Araneae: Spiders, state fauna series 3: Fauna of west Bengal 3. Zool Surv of India. Kolkata.
1992; 357- 500.
21. Patel BH. A Preliminary list of Spiders with description of three new species from Parambikulam wildlife Sanctuary. Kerala. Zoos print Journal. 2002; 18(10):
1207-1212.
22. Gojbe P. Spiders of Jabalpur. MadyaPradesh (Arachnida: Araneae) Zoological survey of India. Kolkata. 2004;
1-154.
23. Ritu Chautan, Vijay Sihag , Singh NP. Distribution and Biocontrol potential of chosen spiders. Journal of Biopesticides .
2009; 2(2): 151-155.
24. Greenslade PJM. Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae. Journal of Animal Ecology.
1964; 33: 301-310.
25. Uetz GW and Unzicker JD. Pitfall trapping in ecological studies of wandering spiders. Journal of Arachnology. 1976; 3: 101-111.
26. Sutherland SW. Ecological census techniques. A handbook. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 1996.
27. Harris C. Collecting techniques. 09 June 2003,[On line at <http://www.marion.ohio-state.edu/spiderweb/collectingtechniques
.htm. 2000.
28. Kaston BJ. Spiders of Connecticut. Geological Natural History Survey. Bulletin No. 70. State Department of Environmental Protection. Hartford.1981.
29. Tikader BK and Biswas B. Spider fauna of Calcutta and vicinity: Part I. - Records of Zoo-logical Survey of India. Occasional
Papers. 1981; 30: 1-149.
30. Tikader BK. The fauna of Indian Araneae. 1982; 2 293.
31. Gajbe UA. A new scopodes spider from India (Araneae: Gnaphosidae) bulletin of the zoological survey of India.
1987; 8:285-287.
32. Biswas B and Biswas K. Araneae: spiders, In: state Fauna Series-3: Fauna of West Bengal. Part 3.Zoological Survey of India Publication. 1992; 357-500.
33. Barrion AT and Litsinge JA. Rice land spiders of South and South East Asia. CAB International. Wallingford England. 1995;
736.
34. Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF. Statistical Ecology: A primer on methods in computing, John Wiley & Sons. New York.
1988.
Review Article CODEN: IJPRNK
I Vijaya Kumar , IJPRBS, 2013; Volume 2(4): 139-151
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
35. R. Margalef. Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton. In: Perspectives in Marine biology. Buzzati Traverso (eds.). Univ Calif Press. Berkeley.
1958; pp. 323-347.
36. Clarke KR and Warwick RM. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. J App Ecol. 1998; 35:
523-531.
37. Clarke KR and Gorley RN. PRIMER v5: User manual/tutorial, Plymouth Marine Laboratory. Plymouth .2001.
38. Pielou EC. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections, J Theoret Biol, 1966; 13: 131¬144.
39. Sebestian PA and Peters KV. Spiders of India. University Press Publication. 2009.
40. Shunmugavelu M and Karthikeyan R. Estimating the Diversity of Spider Assemblages (Araneae: Sparassidae) in of Kumbakarai falls. Theni District. Tamil Nadu. South India. International Conference on Bioresource Technology (ICBRT-2010) on October 7-8 2010 by Department of Botany. Nirmala College
for Women. 2010; (41).
41. Oxford GS and Gillespie RG. Evolution and ecology of spider coloration, Annu
Rev Ento-mol. 1998;28:337-364.
42. Craig CL and Ebert K. Colour and pattern in predator-prey interactions: the bright body colors and patterns of a tropical orb spinning spider attract flower-seeking prey. Funct Ecol. 1994; 8:616¬620.
43. Hauber ME. Conspicuous coloration attracts prey to a stationary predator. Ecol
Entomol. 2002; 27:686-691.
44. Tso IM, Huang JP and Liao JP. Nocturnal hunting of a brightly coloured sit-and-wait predator. Anim Behav. 2007;
74:787-793.
45. Tso IM, Liao CP, Huang R and Yang EC. Function of being colourful in web spiders: at-tracting prey or camouflaging oneself. Behav Ecol. 2006; 17:606-613.
46. Tso IM, Lin CW, and Yang EC. Colourful orb-weaving spiders and web decorations through a bee's eyes. J Exp Biol. 2004;
207:2631-2637.
47. Hoese FJ, Law EAJ, Rao D and Herberstein ME. Distinctive yellow bands on a sit-and-wait predator prey attractant or camouflage. Behaviour. 2006;143:763-
781.
48. Vaclav R and Prokop P. Does the appearance of Orb weaving spiders attract prey. Ann Zool. 2006; Fennici 43:65-71.
49. DL Hawksworth and MT Kalin Arroyo. Magnitude and distribution of biodiversity. In: VH Heywood (eds.), Global Biodiversity Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme. London. Cambridge University press.
1995; pp.107-191.
50. Ried WV and Miller KR. Keeping options alive: A scientific basis for conserving biodiversity. DC Washington . World Resources Institute. 1989.
Review Article CODEN: IJPRNK
I Vijaya Kumar , IJPRBS, 2013; Volume 2(4): 139-151
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
51. DownieI S, Wilson WL, Abernethy VJ, Mccracken D I, Foster GN, Ribera I and Murphy KJ. A Water-House. The impact of different agriculture land-use on epigeal spider diversity in Scotland. Journal of Insect Conservation. 1999; 3:273-286.
52. SE Riechert and RG Gillespie. Habitat choice and utilization in web-building spiders.-In: W.B. Shear (eds.). Spiders: Webs, Behavior and Evolution. Stanford. Stanford University Press. 1986; pp. 23¬48.
53. GW Uetz. Habitat structure and spider foraging. In SS Bell, ED McCoy, HR
Mushinsky (eds). Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman & Hall.London.
54. Coddington JA,Young LH ,Coyle FA, Estimating spiders species richness in a Southern Appalachian cove hardwood forest. Journal of Arachnology. 1996; 24:
111-128.
55. Whittaker RH. A study of summer foliage insect communities in the great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs. 1952; 22: 1-44.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com