Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Örgütsel Demokrasi ve Örgütsel Muhalefet Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir İnceleme

A STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL DEMOCRACY AND ORGANIZATIONAL DISSENT

Journal Name:

  • İşletme Bilimi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study is to research the relationship between organizational democracy and organizational dissent. The other purpose of this research is to provide data to researchers and practitioners working in this field. Organizational democracy has been represented with respect for personal values, democratic attitude, democratic management, democratic behavior and perception of authority aspects in the study. Organizational dissent has been expressed with articulated dissent, displaced dissent and latent dissent aspects. According to the research results, it has been found that there are positive relation between respect for personal values and democratic management, democratic behavior and articulated dissent, and negative relation between democratic attitude and articulated dissent. Also according to research results, it has been found that there is negative relation between perception of authority and articulated, displaced and latent dissents.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel demokrasi ile örgütsel muhalefet arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Bu alanda çalışma yapan araştırmacılara ve uygulayıcılara veri sağlamak araştırmanın bir diğer amacıdır. Araştırmada örgütsel demokrasi; kişisel değerlere saygı, demokratik tutum, demokratik yönetim, demokratik davranış, otorite algısı boyutlarıyla temsil edilmektedir. Örgütsel muhalefet ise açık muhalefet, dolaylı muhalefet ve gizli muhalefet boyutlarıyla ifadelendirilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre kişisel değerlere saygı ile demokratik yönetim, demokratik davranış ile açık muhalefet arasında pozitif yönlü, demokratik tutum ile açık muhalefet arasında ise negatif yönlü ilişkinin olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Yine araştırma bulgularına göre otorite algısı ile açık, dolaylı ve gizli muhalefet arasında negatif yönlü bir ilişkinin olduğu anlaşılmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-orgutsel-demokrasi-orgutsel-muhalefet-arasindaki-iliski-uzerine-bir-inceleme.pdf
  • 1
1
16
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Aktan, C. C. (2006). Organizasyonlarda Yanlış Uygulamalara Karşı Bir Sivil Erdem, Ahlaki Tepki ve Vicdani Ret Davranışı: Whistleblowing. Mercek Dergisi, 1, 1-13.
Aslan, Ş. (2003). Hastane İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Çatışma: Teori ve Örnek Bir Uygulama. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1, 599- 609.
Bennis, W. (2003). On Becoming a Leader. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Pub.
Demir, M. (2010). Örgütsel Çatışma Yönetiminde Duygusal Zekânın Etkisi: Konaklama İşletmelerinde İşgörenlerin Algılamaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 11 (2), 199-211.
Daft, R. L. (2001). Organization Theory & Design. 7th Edition, South-Western Publishing.
Deth, J. V. (2000). Interesting, but Irrelevant: Social Capital and the Saliency Of Politics in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 37, 115-147.
Diamond, L. ve Plattner, M. F. (1995). Demokrasinin Küresel Yükselişi. Çev.: İhsan Sezal - Fatoş Dilber, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara.
Eilerman, D. (2008). Conflict: Personal Dynamics and Choice. http://www.helium.com/items/882718-how-is-the-idea-of-conflict-managemen..., 03.01.2012.
Garner, J. T. (2006). When Things Go Wrong at Work: Expressions of Organizational Dissent at Interpersonal Influence. Dissertation, Abilene Christian University, http://repository.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/5879/etd-tamu-2006A-S..., 31.12.2011.
Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled Organizational Dissent: A Theoretical Essay. B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Ed.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1-52.
Harrison, J. S. ve Freeman, E. (2004). Special Topic: Democracy In and Around Organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 49-53.
Kassing, J. W. (1997). Articulating, Antagonizing and Displacing: A Model of Employee Dissent. Communication Studies, 48(4), 311-332.
Kassing, J. W. (1998). Development and Validation of the Organizational Dissent Scale, Management Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 183-229.
Kassing, J. W. ve Avtgis, T. A. (1999). Examining the Relationship Between Organizational Dissent and Aggressive Communication, Management Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 100-115.
Kassing, J. W. (2001). From the Look of Things: Assessing Perceptions of Organizational Dissenters, Communication Research, 21, 553-574.
Kassing, J. W. (2009). In Case You Didn’t Hear Me the First Time (An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent). Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 22, no. 3, 416-436.
Kassing, J. W. (2011). Stressing Out about Dissent: Examining the Relationship Between Coping Strategies and Dissent Expression. Communication Research Reports, 28(3), 225-234.
Kerr, J. L. (2004). The Limits of Organizational Democracy. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 81-95.
Landier, A., Sraer, D. ve Thesmar, D. (2009). Optimal Dissent in Organizations. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 761-794.
Macy, G. ve Neal, J. C. (1995). The Impact of Conflict – Generating Techniques on Student Reactions and Decision Quality. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(4), 39-45.
Martin, B. (2005). Bucking the System: Andrew Wilkie and the Difficult Task of the Whistleblower. http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/05overland.html, 04.01.2012.
McPhee, R. D. (1988). Vertical Communication Chains: Toward an İntegrated Approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 455-493.
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Ötken, A. B. ve Cenkçi, T. (2013). Beş Faktör Kişilik Modeli ve Örgütsel Muhalefet Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Öneri Dergisi, 10 (399), 41-51.
Özdemir, M. (2010). Ankara İli Kamu Genel Liselerinde Görev Yapan Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Muhalefete İlişkin Görüşleri. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Perlow, L. A. (2003). When the Silence Spells Trouble at Work. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3494.html, 04.01.2012.
Powley, E. H, Fry, R. E., Barrett, F. J. ve Bright, D. S. (2004). Dialogic Democracy Meets Command and Control: Transformation through the Appreciative Inquiry Summit. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 67-80.
Rizvi, F. (2005). In Defence of Organizational Democracy. Smyth, J. (Ed.), Critical Perspectives on Educational Leadership, Routledge, New York, 138-155.
Roberto, M. A. (2006). Why Great Leaders Don’t Take Yes for an Answer. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey.
Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational Behavior. http://www.shareonme.com/en/file/107/organizational-behavior-9th-edition..., 04.01.2012.
Scott, C., Corman, S. ve Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a Structurational Model of İdentification in the Organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298-336.
Sprague, J. A. ve Ruud, G. L. (1988). Boat-Rocking in the High Technology Culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 32(2), 169-193.
Stewart, L. P. (1980). “Whistle Blowing”: Implications for Organizational Communication. Journal of Communication, 30, 90-101.
Stohl, C. ve Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory Processes/Paradoxical Practices: Communication and the Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349-407.
Stolle, D. (1998). Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations. Political Psychology, 19, 497-525.
Strong, B. (2002). The Importance of a Dissenting Voice in Business. http://strong.groups.et.byu.net/pages/articles/articles/dissent.pdf, 03.01.2012.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com