Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

FAZLA KİLOLU VE ŞİŞMAN KADINLARDA BEL ÇEVRESİ UYARI VE EYLEM SINIRLARI

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The alarm and action levels in owerweight and obese Turkish women. The aim of this study is (o test the hypothesis that a single measurement, waist circumfercnce, might be used to identify people at health risk both from being oveıvveight and from having a central fat distribution. We studied 2115 women with normal or pathological weight and it was found that alarm level is greater than 85 cm and action level is greater than 93 cm from a relationship between body mass index and waist circumference. These levels are greater than those in other populations. In conclusİon, women with waist circumference greater than
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Beden kitle indeksi (body mass index, BM1) ve bel çevresi Ölçümleri birleştirilerek tek bir parametre ile kişinin şişman ve santral şişman olduğunu saptamak amacıyla uyarı ve eylem sınırlan göstergeleri ileri sürülmüştür. Türk şişman kadınlarında bu sınırları belirlemek amacıyla 18 yaşın üzerindeki değişik ağırlıklı ve abdominal (santral) şişman (bel çevresi / kalça çevresi oranı 0.8 in üzerinde) 2115 kadında bel çevresi ileBMI arasındaki ilişkiden uyarı sınırı 85 cm ve eylem sınırı 93 cm olarak bulunmuştur. Bu değerler beyaz ve sarı popülasyondan yüksektir. Değerlerin risk göstergelerinin ayırımında etkili olduğu görüldü. Ülkemizde, bel çevresi 85 cm nin üzerinde olan kadınlara kilo almamaları ve 93 cm nin üzerinde olanlara ise zayıflamaları önerilmelidir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-fazla-kilolu-sisman-kadinlarda-bel-cevresi-uyari-eylem-sinirlari.pdf
  • 4
2005-2009
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Armitage P, Berry G: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2the ed., Blackvvell, Oxford, 1987.
2. Ashwell M, Cole TJ, Dixon AK: Obesity. New insight into the anthropometric classification of fat distribution shown by computed tomography. Br Med J 1985; 290: 1692.
3. Barth JH, Ng LL, Wojnarowska F, Dawber RPR: Acant-hosis nigricans, insülin resistance and cutaneous-virilism. Brit J Dermatol 1988; 118: 613.
4. Benn RT: Somc mathematical properties of weight for height indices used as measures of adiposity. Br J Prev Soc Med 1971; 25: 42.
5. Bray GA: Clasîfication and evaluation of ihe obesities. Med Clin North Am 1989; 73: 161.
6. Caterson ID, Gül TP: Obesity. Epidenıiology and possib-le preventioifeCIin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 16: 703.
7. Deurenberg P, Yap M, Van Staveren WA: Body mass in-dex and percent body fat. A meta analysis among diffe-rent ethnic groups. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22: 1164.
8. Fujimoto WY, Bergstrom RW, Boyko EJ, et al: Suscepti-bility to development of centrai adiposity among popula-tions. Obes Res 1995; 3(suppl 2):179S.
9. Jackson AS, Stanforth PR, Gagnon J, et al: The effect of sex, age and race on estimating percentage body fat from
body mass index: the Heritage Famiîy Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26:789.
10. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R: Body mass index, waist circumference, and heallh risk; evidence in support of current National Instİtutes of Heatth guİdelines. Arch Intem Med 2002; 162:2074.
11. Han TS, Lean MEJ: Anthropometric indices of obesity and regional distribution of fat depots. Internationa! Textbook of Obesity, Ed: Björntorp P, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 2001, p: 51-65.
12. Han TS, McNeill G, Seidell JC, Lean MEJ: Predicting intra abdominal fatness from anthropometric measures. The infiuence of stature. Int J Obesity Reİat Metab Disord 1997; 21: 587.
13. Han TS, Richmond P, Avenell A, Lean MEJ: Waist circumference reduction and cardiovascuiar benefits during weight loss in women. Int J Obesity Relat Metab Disord 1997; 21: 127.
14. Han TS, Seidefl JC, Currall JEP, Morrison CE, Deurenberg P, Lean MEJ: The influences of height and age on waist circumference as an index of adiposity in adults. Int J Obesity Relat Metab Disord 1997; 21: 84.
15. Han TS, Van Leer EM, Seidell JC, Lean MEJ: Waist circumference action ievels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors. Prevalence study in a random sample. Brit Med J 1995; 311:1401.
16. Hsieh SD, Yoshinaga H, Muto T: Waist toheight ratio, a simple and practical index for assessing centrai fat distribution and metabolic risk in Japanese men and women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 610.
17. Katz A, Nambi SS, Mather K, Baron AD, Follman DA, Sullivan G, Quon MJ: Quantitative insülin sensitivity check index. A simple, accurate method for assessing insülin sensitivity in humans. J Cün Endocrinol Metab 2000;85: 2402.
18. Lean MEJ, Han TS, Morrison CE: Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. Br Med J 1995; 311: 158.
19. National Instİtutes of Health: Clinical guİdelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. Obes Res 1998; 6(suppl2):51S.
20. Nie NH, Hull CM, Jenkins JG, Steinbrennar K, Benta DM: Statistical Package of the Social Sciences (SPSS), 2th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
21. Norusis MJ: SPSS/PC+ for IBM PC/XT/AT. SPSS Inc., Chicago, 1983.
22. Özbey N, Kazancıoğlu R, Orhan Y: Şişman.kadınlarda, bel çevresi ve çeşitli risk faktörleri ile İTÎşkisi. İstanbul Tıp Fak Mecm 2000; 63: 147.
23. WHO (Western Pasifle Region), International obesity task force and international association for the study of obesity: The Asia-Pasific perspeetive. Redefîning obesity and its treatment. Health Communications, Sydney 2000.
24. World Health Organisation: Obesity, preventing and ma-naging the global epidemic. Technicaİ report 894, WHO, Geneva, 2000, s: 256.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com