Buradasınız

İSTANBUL’DA İLKÖĞRETİM ÇAĞINDAKİ ÇOCUKLARDA YÜZEYEL MİKOZ (TİNEA PEDİS VE ONİKOMİKOZ) PREVALANSI

THE PREVALENCE OF SUPERFICIAL MYCOSIS (TINEA PEDIS AND ONYCHOMYCOSIS) IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN IN ISTANBUL

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of tinea pedis and onychomycosis in children of elementary school age and to examine socio-demographic features that might influence the existence of both types of mycosis. Materials and methods: A total of 3390 female and 3768 male children aged between 6 and 14 years have been examined in seven schools. Skin scrapings and nail samples were taken from 13 students who were suspected to have tinea pedis and from 49 students who were suspected to have onychomycosis. Suspicious skin scrapings and nails were clarified in 10-15% KOH + calcofluor white through the direct microscopic method and then examined under a fluorescent microscope and assessed as positive or negative according to the existence of mycelium and / or spores. Afterwards, these samples were placed on test cultivation places onto SDA and DTM and incubated for a period of 21 days at 26-300C. Results: 11 students were diagnosed as tinea pedis and 24 were diagnosed as onychomycosis. Trichpohyton rubrum was isolated from 3 students with tinea pedis whose culture was positive, and five Candida albicans, five Candida glabrata and one Candida tropicalis cases were isolated from 11 samples with onychomycosis. Tinea pedis prevalence has been found to be 1.5% and onychomycosis prevalence has been found to be 3.3%. Differences between onychomycosis prevalence based on age have been found to be statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: In conclusion, it has been determined that the prevalence of tinea pedis and onychomycosis among children is low. Candida spp. was isolated from all of the 14 samples diagnosed as onychomycosis. Our study shows similar results with previous studies done in Turkey and T.rubrum continues to be the most common isolated agent.
113-118

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Aly R. Ecology and epidemiology of dermatophyte infections.
Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31: 21-25.
2. Bahamdan K, Mahfouz A, Tallab T, Badawi IA, Al-Amari OM.
Skin diseases among adolescent boys in Abha, Saudi Arabia. Int
J Dermatol 1996; 35:405-407.
3 Blank F, Mann SJ. Trichophyton rubrum infections according to
age, anatomical distribution and sex. Br J Dermatol 1975;
92:171-174.
4. Bokhari MA, Hussain I, Jahangir M, Haroon TS, Aman S,
Khursid K. Onychomycosis in Lahore, Pakistan. Int J Dermatol
1999; 38:591-595.
5. Brajac I, Prpic- Massari L, Stojnic-Sosa L, Gruber F. The epidemiology
of Microsporum canis infections in Rijeka area, Crotia.
Mycoses 2004; 47: 222-226.
6. Cheng SY, Chong LY. Aprospective epidemiological study on
tinea pedis and onychomycosis in Hong Kong. Chin Med J
2002; 115:860- 864.
7. Crissey JT. Common dermatophyte infections. A simple diagnostic
test and current management. Postgrad Med 1998; 103:
191-192.
8. Drake LA, Dinehart SM, Farmer ER, Goltz RW, Graham GF,
Hordinsky MK. Guidelines of care for superficial mycotic infections
of the skin: Onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;
34:116-121.
9. Drusko VB, Rucevia I, Biljan D, Jukia Z. Epidemiology of dermatomycosis
in the Eastern Crotia yesterday and today. Coll
Antropol 2003; 27: 11-17.
10. Ekanem LS, Gugnani HC. Etiology of dermatophytoses
amongst school children in Cross River State of Nigeria. Mykosen
1987; 30:493-498.
11. Elewski BE. Clinical pearl: diagnosis of onychomycosis. J Am
Acad Dermatol 1995; 2:500-501.
12. Elewski BE. Cutaneous mycoses in children. Br J Dermatol
1996; 46(134 Suppl):7-11
13. Elewski BE, Charif MA. Prevalence of onychomycosis in patients
attending a dermatology clinic in northeastern Ohio for other
conditions. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133:1172-1173.
14. Elewski BE. Onychomycosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.
Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11:415-429.
15. Enveani IB, Ozan CC, Agbonlahor DE, Ndip RN. Dermatophytosis
in schoolchildren in Ekpoma, Nigeria. Mycoses
1996; 39:303-305. .
16. Erbagci Z, Tuncel A, Zer Y, Balci I. Aprospective epidemiologic
survey on the prevalence of onychomycosis and dermatophytosis
in male boarding school.residents.
Mycopathologia 2005; 159:347-352.
17. F›nd›k D, Mevluto¤lu ‹, Kaya M, Arslan U, Yuksel A. Dermatofitoz
ön tan›l› olgularda izole edilen etkenler. A.D.U. T›p Fakültesi
Dergisi 2001; 2:19-22.
18. Gupta AK, Sibbald RG, Lynde CW, Hull PR, Prussick R, Shear
NH, De Doncker P, Daniel CR, Elewski BE. Onychomycosis
in children: prevalence and treatment strategies. Am Acad Dermatol
1997; 36:395-402.
19. Inanir I, Sahin MT, Dinc G, Turel A, Arisoy A, Ozturkcan S.
Case Report. Tinea pedis and onychomycosis in primary school
children in Turkey. Mycoses 2002; 45:198-201.
20. Jang KA, Chi DH, Choi JH, Sung KJ, Moon KC, Koh JK. Tinea
pedis in Korean children Int J Dermatol 2000; 30: 25-27.
21. Jesudanam TM, Rao GRR, Lakshmi DJ, Kumari GR. Onychomycosis:
A significant medical problem J. Indian J. Dermatol
Venereal Leprol 2002; 68: 326-329.
22. Kiraz M,Ye¤enoglu Y, Erturan Z, Ang O. The epidemiology of
onychomycoses in Istanbul, Turkey. Mycoses 1999; 42:323-329.
23. Kuklova I, Kucerova H. Dermatophytoses in Prague, Czech Republic,
between 1987 and 1998. Mycoses 2001; 44: 493-496.
24. Leibovici V, Evron R, Dunchin M, Strauss-Leviatan N, Westerman
M, Ingber A. Population-based epidemiologic study of tinea
pedis in Israeli children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002; 21:851-
854.
25. Lupa S, Seneczko F, Jeske J, Glowacka A, Szymanska AO. Epidemiology
of dermatomycoses of humans in Central Poland.
Part IV. Onychomycosis due to dermatophytes. Mycoses 1999;
42:657-660.
26. Mercantini R, Marsella M, Moretto D. Onychomycosis in Rome,
Italy. Mycopothologi 1996; 136: 25-30.
27. Merlin K, Kilkenny M, Plunkett A, Marks R. The prevalence
of common skin conditions in Australian school students: 4 Tinea
pedis. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140:897-901.
Tinea pedis and onychomycosis in elementary school children
‹stanbul T›p Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt / Volume: 68 • Say› / Number: 4 • Y›l/Year: 2005
- 118 -
28. Metintas S, Kiraz N, Arslantas D, Kalyoncu C, Kiremitci A, Unsal
A. Frequency and risk factors of dermatophytosis in students
living in rural areas in Eskisehir, Turkey. Mycopathologia 2004;
157:379-382.
29. Ogasawara Y, Hiruma M, Muto M, Ogawa H. Clinical and
mycological study of occult tinea pedis and tinea unguium in
dermatological patients from Tokyo. Mycoses 2003; 46:114-
119.
30. Perea S, Ramos MJ, Garau M, Gonzalez A, Noriega AR. Prevalence
and risk factors of tinea unguium and tinea pedis in the general
population in Spain. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:3226-3230.
31. Popescu R, Popescu CM, Williams HC, Forsea D. The prevalence
of skin conditions in Romanian school children. Br J Dermatol
1999; 140 :891-896.
32. Reddy BSN, Ramesh V, Singh R. Clinico - mycological study of
onychomycosis Indian J. Dermatol Venereal Leprol 1982;
48:145-150.
33. Scher RK.Onychomycosis: a significant medical disorder. J Am
Acad Dermatol 1996; 35: 2-5.
34. Schmeller W, Baumgartner S, Dzikus A. Dermatophytomycoses
in children in rural Kenya: the impact of primary health care.
Mycoses 1997; 40:55-63.
35. Seneczko F, Lupa S, Jeske J, Glowacka A, Szymanska AO. Epidemiology
of dermatomycoses of humans in Central Poland.
Part 1. Mycoses 1999; 42: 297-306.
36. fiahin ‹, Öksüz S, Kaya D, fiencan ‹, Çetinkaya R. Dermatophytes
in the rural area of Duzce, Turkey. Mycoses 2004;
47 : 470-474.
37. Tan HH. Superficial fungal infections seen at the National Skin
Centre, Singapore. Jpn J Med Mycol 2005; 46: 77-80.
38. Tezcan S. Epidemiyoloji. Hacettepe Halk Sa¤l›¤› Vakf›, Ankara,
1992; 238-239.
39. Velez A, Linares MJ, Roldan JC, Casal M. Study of onychomycosis
in Cordoba, Spain: prevailing fungi and pattern of infection.
Mycopathologia 1997; 137:1-8.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com