Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

POSTERIOR KOMPOZIT RESTORASYONLARDA MİKROSIZINTI VE BU OLAYDA ETKİLİ OLAN FAKTÖRLER

MICROLEAKAGE OF POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS AND INFLUENTIAL FACTORS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1993

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this article is to investigate the most important problem, microleakage of posterior composite resine restorations and to evaluate the effective factors on the failures in gingival areas. In many studies, it was obtained that the most important factor irritated the pulp was bacteria and their toxins that could get from oral cavity to dental tissue. For that reason, the importance of microleakage subject increased. The investigations about this subject may be evaluated in two points. First of them is the combination of composite resin materials and the techniques of their usage. The second is the other materials and equipments that can be used in these restorations. From these studies it was determined that the combination of composite resine, the techniques of setting composite resine materials into cavities, the other materials like bonding agents and glassionomer cements which may be used during making composite restorations and some ens-truments are very valuable and important for a successfull posterior composite resine restorations.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makalede, posterior kompozit reçine restorasyonlarının en önemli sorunu olan mikrosızıntı ve özellikle dişeti basamağı bölgesindeki başarısızlıkların gözden geçirilmesi ve bu durumda etkili olan faktörlerin ele alınarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmalar sonucunda, pulpayı olumsuz yönde etkileyen en önemli faktörün, ağız ortamından diş dokusuna ulaşabilen bakteri ve toksinlerinin olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu, mikrosızıntı olayının önemini arttırmıştır. Belirlenen mikrosızıntı ve buna bağlı gelişen sorunları inceleyen araştırmalar, kompozit materyalinin yapısı, uygulanışı ve bu restorasyonlarda kullanılan materyaller, enstrümanlar olmak üzere iki bölümde değerlendirilebilir. Yapılan çalışmalar, kompozit reçinenin yapısının, ka-viteye yerleştirilme tekniğinin, bu restorasyonların yapımı sırasında kullanılan diğer bağlayıcı ajan ve camiyonomer siman gibi materyallerin ve kullanılan yardımcı aygıtların arka bölge kompozit restorasyonların başarısında çok büyük önem taşıdığım ortaya koymuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-posterior-kompozit-restorasyonlarda-mikrosizinti-bu-olayda-etkili-olan-faktorler.pdf
  • 1
74
78
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Amsberry, W., Von Founhofer, J.A., Hoots, 3., Rodgers, H.: Marginal leakage of several acid-etch composite resin restorative systems. / Prosthet Dent, 1984; 52: 647.
2. Bacher, J., Dermaut, L.: Visible light sources and posterior visible light cured resins: a practical mixture. Quintessence Int, 1986; 17:635.
3. Bandyopadhyay, S.: A study of the volumetric setting shrinkage of some dental materials. J Biomed Mater Res, 1982; 16:135.
4. Brackett, W.W., Robinson, P.B.: Composite resin and glass-ionomer cement: current status for use in cervical restorations. Quintessence Int, 1990; 21:445.
5. Brânnström, M., Nordenvall, K.J.: Bacterial penetration, pulpal reaction and the inner surface of Concise Enamel Bond. Composite fillings in etched and unetched cavites. J Dent Res, 1978, 1:3.
6. Brânnström, M.: The cause of postrestorative sensitivity and its prevention. JEndod, 1986; 12:475.
7. Browne, R.M., Tobias, R.S.: Microbial microleakage and pulpal inflammation: A review. EndodDent Trav, 1986; 2: 111.
8. Chadwick, R.G., Cabe, J.F., A. Walls, W.G.: The effect of placement technique upon the compressive strength and porosity of composite resin. J Dent, 1989; 17: 230.
9. Craig, R.G.: Restorative Dental Materials: The C.V.
Mosby Company St. Louis-Toronto-Princeton; Seventh edition, 1985.
10. Crim, G.A., Chapman, K.W.: Effect of placement techniques on microleakage of dentin-bonded composite resin. Quintessence Int, 1986; 17:21.
11. Crim, G.A.: Assesment of microleakage of three dentinal bonding systems. Quintessence Int, 1990; 21:295.
12. Duncanson, M.G., Mironda, FX, Probst, R.T.: Resin dentine bonding agents. Quintessence Int, 1986; 17: 625.
13. Eick, J.D., Welch, F.H.: Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int, 1986; 17:103.
14. Fayyad, M.A., Shortall, A.C.C.: Microleakage of dentine bonded posterior composite restorations. J Dent, 1987; 15:67.
15. Feilzer, A.J., Dawidson, C.L.: Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent, 1988; 59: 297.
16. Fusayama, T.: Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int, 1987; 15:633.
17. Goldman, M.: Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. AustDentJ, 1983; 28: 156.
18. Gordon, M., Pİasochaert, J.M., Saiku, J.M.: Microleakage of posterior composite resin materials and an experimental urethane restorative material, tested in vitro above and below the cemento enamel junction. Quintessence Int, 1986; 17:11.
78
Y. Benderli
19. Hay, J.N. Shrotall, A.C.: Polymerization contraction and reaction kinetics of three chemically activated restorative resins. /Denf, 1988; 16:112.
20. Hembree, J.H.: Microleakage of microfiiled composite resin restorations with different cavosurface designs. J Prosthet Dent, 1984; 52:653.
21. Johnson, G.H., Gordon, G.E.: Postoperative sensitivity associated with posterior composite and amalgam restorations. OperDent, 1988; 23:66.
22. Jones, J.G., Grieve, A.R., Younson, C.C.: Marginal leakage associated with three posterior restorative materials. J Dent, 1988; 16:130.
23. Kanca, J.: Posterior resins: microleakage below the ce-mentoenamel junction: Quintessence Int, 1987; 75:347.
24. Kelsey, W.P., Sharrer, G.O., Cavel, W.T.: The effects of wand positioning on the polymerization of composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc, 1987; 114:54.
25. Krejci, I., Sparr, D., Lutz, F.: A three-sited light curing technique for conventional class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int, 1987; 1S:125.
26. Leinfelder, K.F.: Posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc (special issue), 1988; 24-E.
27. Lui, J.L., Masutani, S., Setco, J.C.: Margin quality and microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 1987; 114: 49.
28. Lutz, F.: De Adhesive Restoration. Zahnârztl. Praxis., 1975; 26:51.
29. Lutz, F., Krejci, I.: Improved proximal marginal adaptation of Class TJ composite resin restoration by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int, 1986; 17:659.
30. Mair, L.H., Vowles, R.: The effect of thermal cycling on the fracture toughness of seven composite restorative materials. Dent Mater J, 1989; 5:23.
31. Moffa, J.P., Jenkins, W.A.: Four year posterior clinical evaluation of two composite resins. J Dent Res, 1975; 54:48.
32. Phillips, R.W.: Observations on a composite resin for class TJ restorations. Three-year report. / Prosthet Dent, 1973; 30:891.
33. Phillips, R.W.: Should I be using amalgam or composite restorative material. Int Dent J, 1975; 25:236.
34. Pratİ, C, Montanarİ, G.: Comparative microleakage study between the sandwich and conventional three increment techniques. Quintessence Int, 1989; 20:597.
35. Rees, J.S., Jacobsen, P.H.: The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. Dent Mater, 1989; 5-41.
36. Rowe, A.H.R.: A five year study of the clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material. J Deny 1989; 17:56.
37. Rupp, N.W., Venz, S., Cobb, N.E.: Sealing of gingival margin of composite restorations. J Dent Res, 1983; 62:254.
38. Sheth, P.J., Jensen, M.E.: Comparative evaluation of three resin inlay techniques: microleakage studies. Quintessen celnt, 1989; 20:831.
39. Swift, E.J.: Pulpal effects of composite resin restorations. OperDent, 1989; 14:20.
40. Walls, A.W.G.: Polymerization contraction of visible light activated composite resins. J Dent, 1988; 16:177.
41. Wilson, N.H.F., Smith, G.A.: A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative material three year results. Quintessence Int, 1986; 71: 643.
42. Yamaguchi, R., Powers, J.M.: Thermal expansion of visible light cured composite. OperDent, 1989; 14; 64.
43.
Yücel
, T., Poyrazoğlu, E., Demirci, Ş-, Yıldırım, S., Benderli, Y.: Görünen ışık ile sertleşen posterior kompozit ile amalgam restorasyonların bir senelik ve 4- senelik klinik sonuçlan ve genel değerlendirmesi, İÜ Diş HekFakDer, 1989; 23:115.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com