Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

BEGG LIGHT WIRE ISKELETSE L VE PROFİL YUMUŞAK DOKU DEĞİŞİKLİKLERİNİN SEFALOMETRİK İNCELEMESİ

CEPHALOMETRIC EVALUATION OF BEGG LIGHT WIRE ON SKELETAL AND PROFILE SOFT TISSUES

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1993

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study is conducted as to evaluate the skeletal and sofi tissue changes following Begg Light-wire treatment on initial and final lateral cephalograms of 28 class 1 anterior crowding individuals whose four bicuspids are extracted. A similar control group also consisted of equal number of male and female individuals and lateral cephalograms are obtained within the pertinent cephalometric analysis indicated significant skeletal changes in line with the direction of facial growth. Soft tissue profile changes is found to be as anticipated as straightining of the profile which is a known outcome of extraction treatment.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Begg light-wire tekniği uygulanarak dört premolar çeki-miyle tedavi edilen sınıf 1 anterior çapraşıklığı olan 28 birey benzer özelliklere sahip 28 bireyin tedavi öncesi ve sonunda aynı süreler arasında çekilen toplam 112 lateral sefa-logram üzerinde araştırma yürütülmüştür. Ricketts ve ilgili sefalometrik analizler sonucunda light-wire tedavisiyle iskelet sistemde bireylerin büyüme yönü ile uyumlu olarak bazı etkilerde gözlenmiştir. Yumuşak dokulardaki değişiklikler çekimli tedavinin beklenen sonucu olan profil düzleşmesi tarzındadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-begg-light-wire-iskeletse-l-profil-yumusak-doku-degisikliklerinin-sefalometrik-incelemesi.pdf
  • 4
290
298
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1- Allen J T. Changes İn vertical relatfonships of leeth during and following use of the Begg light wire differential. Am J Ort-hod 1968: 52: 152.
2- Barrer H G. Survey of Begg treatment. AmJOrthod 1963: 49: 494-506.
3- Barrer H G. Nonextraction treatment with the Begg technique. Am J Orthod 1969: 56: 365-78.
4- Barrer H G. Current concepts in Begg philosophy and technique: round table. J Clin Orthod 1982:16: 108-29.
5- Barton J J. A cephalometric comparison of cases treated with edgewise and Begg techniques. Angle Orthod 1973: 43: 119-26.
6- Begg P R. Stone age mans dentition. Am J Orthod 1954: 40: 298-312, 373-83, 467-75, 517-31.
7- Begg P R Kesling P C. Begg orthodontic theory and technique. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1971.
8- Björk A. Variatinos in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radioğraphic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 1963: 42: 401-11.
298
M. Özgen S. Ciğer, M. Demirhanoğlu
9- Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969: 24:109-27.
10- Brandt S. Experiences with the Begg technique. Angle Orthod., 1962: 32:156-66.
1 i- Canglİosi J J Mesitrell M E. a cephalometric evaluation of hard and soft tissue changes during the third stage of Begg treatment. Am J Orthod 1982: 81:124-29.
12- Carter N. First premolar extractions and fixed appliances in the class 11 division 1 masocclusion. Brit Dent J 1988:15:1¬10.
13- Fisher J C. A cephalometric comparison of vertical dimension changes in Begg versus edgewise cases during treatment. Master's thesis, St. Louis University, St. Louis, 1974.
14- Fletcher G G T. The Begg appliance and technique. Bristol: Wright P.S.G., 1981.
15-
GÖge
n H. Edgewise ve Begg teknik yöntemleri ile tedavi edilen vakalarda yüzün dik yön boyutlarında görülen değişiklikler. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi 1989: 2: 51-63,
16- Holdaway R. Alınmıştır: Hambleton R S. Soft tissue covering of the skeletal face as related to orthodontic problems. Am. J. Orthod., 1964; 50: 405-420.
17- Janzen E.K. A balanced smile a most important treatment objective. Am J Orthod 1977: 72: 359-72.
18- Levin R I. Treatment results with the Begg technique. Am J Orthod 1977: 72: 239-60.
19- Menezes D M. Comparative analysis of changes resulting from bite plane therapy and Begg treatment. Angle Orthod 1975: 45: 259-66.
20- O'Reilly M F. Treatment and posttreatment changes with the Begg appliance. Am J Orthod 1979: 75: 535-47.
21- Perlow J. A critique of the Begg technique from the standpoint of biomechanics. Am J Orthod 1968: 54: 407-32.
22- Ricketts R M. The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod 1960: 30:103-33.
23- Ricketts R M. Bioprogressive therapy as an answer to orthodontic needs. Am J Orthod. 1976: 70: 241-68, 359-97.
24- Ricketts R M Bench R W, Gugino CF Hİlgers J J Schulhof R J. Bioprogressive therapy-Denver: Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, 1979.
25- Ricketts R M, Roth R H Chaconas S T, Schulhof R J Engel GA Orthodontic diagnosis and planning. Denver: Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Vol. 1, 1982.
26-
Saraçbaş
ı O, Karaoğlu E, Saka O. Basic programlama ve istatiksel yöntemler. Ankara: Unalan Ofset, 1986.
27- Thompson J.W. a cephalometric evaluation of incisor positioning with the Begg appliance. Angle Orthod 1974: 44:171¬177.
28- Thompson F G. Begg class 11 treatment planning for optimum profile control. Aus Orthod J 1982: 7:101-16.
29- Van der Linden F P G M. Facial growth and facial orthopedics. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co., 1980.
30- West V C, Lewin B. Cephalometric evaluation of bioprogressive therapy in the treatment of overbite. J Clin Orthod 1989: 23: 740-47,
31- Williams R. The cant of the occlusal plane and mandibular planeswith and without pure Begg treatment. J Pract Orthod 1968: 2: 496-505.
32- Williams R. Begg treatment of high angle cases. Am J Orthod 1970: 57: 573-89.
33- Williams R. In Begg orthodontic theory and technique. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 3rded., 1977.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com