Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

BAZI KANAL PATLARININ SİTOTOKSİSİTELERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

INVESTIGATION OF CYTOTOXICITY OF SOME ROOT CANAL SEALERS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1994

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Cytotoxicity of various root canal sealers (Sealapex, Grossman, Ketac-Endo, Diaket, CRCS veAH26) in KB cell line (human epidermoid carcinoma) was investigated by sulforhodamine B test. Root canal sealers were prepared according to the instructions of the manufacturer and tested at final concentrations of25, 250 ve 2500p%lml with respect to powder or creme part. All the root canal sealers other than Diaket inhibited the growth of KB cells in a do-se-depent manner. At 2500\igjml, AH 26, Grosman, CRCS, Sealapex, Diaket ve Ketac Endo inhibited the growth by 100%, 95%, 94%, 83%, 73% and 23%, respectively. Conclusively, Ketac Endo was found to be the least toxic root canal sealer, whereas CRCS, AH26 and Grossman seem the most toxic sealers at 2500fig/ml. On the other hand, Diaket and Grossman were the most cytotoxic sealers at 25\igjml.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmamızda değişik kanal patlarının (Sealapex, Grossman, Ketac-Endo, Diaket, CRCS ve AH26) KB hücreleri (epidermoid karsİnom, insan) üzerindeki sitotoksik etkileri SRB testi ile incelenmiştir. Kanal patlan İmalatçının tarifine uygun olarak hazırlanmış ve toz veya krem kısım esas alındığında 25, 250 ve 2500u,g/ml nihai konsantrasyonunda denenmiştir. Diaket haricindeki tüm patların etkisi doz düşürülünce azalmıştır. 2500 ng/ml konsantrasyonunda AH 26 %100, Grossman %95, CRCS %94, Sealapex %83, Diaket %73, ve Ketac Endo %23 oranında toksi-sİte göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak, 2500^g/ml konsantrasyonunda en az toksik patın Ketac-Endo ve en fazla toksik patların AH26, CRCS ve Grossman olduğu görülmektedir. Diğer yandan, konsantrasyon 25\ıg/mVa düşürüldüğü zaman Diaket ve Grossman en fazla sitotoksik bulunmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-bazi-kanal-patlarinin-sitotoksisitelerinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 2
109
112
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. AI-Nazhan S, Spanberg LSW. Morphological cell changes due to chemical toxicity of a dental material: An electron microscopic stury on human periodontal ligament fibroblast and L-929 cells. JEndodon 1990:16: 129-35.
2. Antrim DD. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of root canal sealing agents on tissue culture cell in vitro: Grossman's sealer, N (perma-nant) Ricert's sealer and Cavit. J Endodon 1976: 2: 111-6.
3. Brauner A, Auguthun M, Kaden P. Die Zellkultifr als System sur Priifung Zell Wachstumsbeeinflussender Wirkungen in der biologischen Materİaltestung. Z Zahnarzt. Implantol 1984:4; 223-7.
4. Brauner A, Auguthun M, Kaden P. Die Zellkultur humaner Gingivafibroblasten zur biologischen Prüfung von in der mund-höhle verwendeten Materialen. Z Stamatol 1989:86; 533-8.
5. Briseno BM, Willerhausen B. Root canal sealer cytotoxicity
on human gingival fibroblasts: I. Zinc oxide eugenol-based sealers. JEndodon 1990:16: 383-6.
6. Briseno BM. Willerhausen B. Root canal sealer cytotoxicity on human gingival fibroblasts: II. Silicon and resin-based sea¬lers. JEndodon 1991:17: 537-40.
7. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials 8 th ed. St. Louis, CV/Mosby Co 1989.
8. Dorter (Aslan) F. Cam iyonomer sistemlerinin in vitro sito-toksisitelerinin karşılaştırmalı incelemesi-Do&fora tezi: Istanbul, 1993.
9. Grossman LI. Endodontic Practice, 10 th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febriger, 1981.
10. Költzer WT. Oral mucosa usage tests. J Endodon 1978: 4:312-5.
112
N. Gençoğlu, Ferda Kelağasıoğlu
11. Matsumuto K, Inoue K, Matsumuto A. The effect of newly developed root canal sealers on rat dental pulp cells in primary culture JEndodon 1989:15: 60-7.
12. Meryon SD, Brook AM. In vitro comparison of the cytotoxicity of twelve endodontic materials using a new technique. Int Endodon J 1990: 23: 203-10.
13. Mohammad AR, Mincer HH, Youinis O, Dillingham E, Siskin M. Cytotoxicity evaluation of root canal sealers by the tissue culture-agar overlay technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978: 45: 768-73.
14. Nakamura H, Sakakibara F, Matsumoto N, Hirano S, Ha-yakawa H, Sakai K, Yipi M. Study on the cytotoxicity of root canal filling materials. J Endodon 1986:12:156-160.
15. Pascon EA, Spanberg LSW. In vitro cytotoxicity of root canal sealing materials. 1.Gutta-percha. J Endodon 1990: 16: 429-32.
16. Paterson RC, Watts A. Toxicity to the pulp of a glass iono-mer cement. Br Dent J 1987:162:110-2.
17. Ray H, Seltzer S. A new glass ionomer root canal sealer/ Endodon 1991:17: 598-603.
18. Safavi KE, Spanberg LSW, Costa NS, Sappounas G. An in vitro method for longutudinal evaluationof toxicity of endodontic sealers/ Endodon 1989:15: 484-6.
19. Skehan P, Storeng R, Scuderio D, Monks A, McMahon J, Vistica D, Warren JI, Bokesch H, Kermey S, Boyd MR. A new co-lorimetric assay for anticancer drug screening. JNCI1990: 82: 1107-12.
20. Sonat B, Dalat Df Burgu î, Özkul A. Kanal dolgu maddelerinin toksisite potansiyellerinin HeLa hücre kültürleri üzerinde değerlendirilmesi AÜ DişHekFak Der Nisan 1992:19:35-42.
21. Spanberg L, Pascon E. The importance of material preparation for the expression of cytotoxicity during in vitro evaluation of biomaterials./E/n/oı/o/ı 1988:14: 247-50.
22. Tyas MJ. A method for the in vitro toxicity testing of dental restorative materials./Dent Rest 1977:56: 1285-89.
23. Welker D, Neupert G, Oehring H. Aspekte der Toxisitats-prufung stomatologischer Werksteffe. Zahn Mund Kieferhe-ilkd 1986: 74:699-705.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com