Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

SÜT AZI DİŞLERİNDE "DELTON VE HELIOSEAL" FİSSÜR ÖRTÜCÜLERİN KLİNİK GÜVENİLİRLİKLERİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI

THE CLINICAL PELIABIUTY OF, "DELTON AND HELIOSEAL" FISSURE SEA LENTS ON PRIMARY MOLARS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1997

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
One of the main goal in pediatric dentistry is to maintain the primary teeth until the end of their physiologic resorption period to protect the normal pennenant eruption processus. As the primary molars are very important for the development! length ofdental arches, the prevention becomes vital for these teeth. Pit and fissure sealent is an excellent example of a preventive treatment that has been only slowly adopted by the pedodontists who especially prefer to use for the permanent molars. In this study, two sealents (Delton, Helioseal) were applied in 108primery second mandibulary molar (caries free) oj 49 subjects aged 4 to 7years in Fribourg dental pediatric clinics. All of these subjets received two types sealent applicati on on the different sides. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomic from marginal adaptation, marginal colo-risation, superficial irregularities and caries of these sealents after 6 and 12 months. 100 % of the applied sealents were considered satisfactory 6 months after application. AWiough partial loss of sealent occurred after 12 months in few cases, no occlusal caries was observed in any tooth. No significant differences in the results of the clinical evaluation were found between sealents as regard to applicability to brimarv molars so it can be concluded thev are safe and useful clinically.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çocuk dişhekimliğinin en önemli amaçlarından biri süt dişlerini normal fizyolojik periodlanmn sonuna kadar ağızda fonksiyonel ve sağlıklı olarak tutabilmek bu amaçla hertürlü koruyucu ve restoratif uygulamayı gerçekleştirmektir. Özellikle süt molarlarm diş arkındaki stratejik konumları gözönüne alındığında bu dişlerin korunması için hertürlü koruyucu tedbirlerin küçük yaşlardan itibaren alınmasının gerekliliği ortaya çıkmakta ve bu amaçla geliştirilmiş ancak daha ziyade daimi molarlarda kullanılan fissür örtücülerin uygulam-mı gündeme gelmektedir. Yapılan bu çalışmada da Fri-bourg Kantonu Okul Dişli ekimliği Servisleri Pedodonti Kliniğinde yaşları 4-7 arasında değişen ve alt ikinci süt molar dişlerinin her ikisinin çürüksüz olduğu toplam 49 hastaya Helioseal ve Delton marka pit ve fissür örtücü uygulanmış ve dişlerin anatomik form, marjinal intereasvon marjinal renklenme vüzev düzen/ili&i ve rekürrent çürük değerlendirmeleri 6 ve 12 aylık peri-odlarla yapılarak 6 ay sonraki kontrollerde mükemmel C%1001 12 av sonraki değerlendirmelerde ise bir kac dişte oarsive! kavla közlenmesine karsın mükemmele valan sonuçlar elde edilmiştir her ild fissür örtücü arasında süt dişlerine uwulanabilirlik acısından bir fark bulunmamıştır Sonuç olarak bu fissür örtücülerin «s-rek koruvucu özellikleri eerekse fonksivonel uvumları afKmJly klinik mivpnilirlifri vüks^k m/ddelPrin ortak
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sut-azi-dislerinde-delton-helioseal-fissur-ortuculerin-klinik-guvenilirliklerinin-arastirilmasi.pdf
  • 4
205
213
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Amerongen vanJP. Penning G. Kidd EAM, Cate JM: An in vitro assessment of the extent of caries under small occlusal cavities. Caries Res 1992:26:89-93.
2. Ast DB, Bushel A, Chase HC: A clinical study of caries prophylaxis with zine chloride and potassium pharocyanide. J Am Dent Assoc 1950:41:437-42.
3. Backer Dirks O: The benefits of water fluoridation. Caries Res 1974:8:2-15.
4. Bohannon HM: Indications for sealing use in a community-based preventive dentistry program. / Dent Educ 1984:48:45-55.
5. Bödcckcr CF: Eradication of enamel Fissures. Detit Items Interest 1926:51:859-66.
6. Brooks JD:, Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Delia Guistina VE, WilliamsJE: A comparative study of two pit and fissure sealents: three year results in Augusta, GA. / Am Dent Assoc 1979:99:42-6,
7. Carvelho JC, Ekstrand KK, Thystrup A: Dental plaque and caries on occlusal surfaces of first pennenant molars in relation to stage oferuption./Denf fies 1989:68:773-9.
8. Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Council of Dental Therapeutics. Pit and fissure sealents JADA 1971:82:1101-4.
9. Cueto EI, buonocore MG: Sealing of pits and Fissures jith adhesive resin. Its use in caries prevention.//!™ Dent Assoc 1967:75:121-28.
10. DcCrane LPG, Martens LC, Dcrmout LR, Surmont PAS: A clininal evaluatino of a light-cured sealent (Lehiose-sâ).JDent Child 1989:56:97-102.
11. Dcnnison IB, Straffon LH: Clinical evaluation comparing sealent and amalgam-4 year report. / Dent Res 1981:60:520.
12. Dooland M, Admin GDH, Smales R: The diagnosis of fissure-caries in permenant molar teeth. J Dent Child 1982:49:181-85.
13. Downer MC: Concurrent validity of an epidemiological diagnostic siyslcm for caries with the histological appearance of extracted teeth as validatin criterion. Caries Res 1975:9:231-46.
14. Eklund SA, Ismail AI: Time of development of occlusal and proximal lesions: Implications for fissure sealents. J Public Health Dent 1986:46:114-21.
15. Garcia Godoy F: Retention or a light-cured sealent (Helioseal) in a tropical environment after 12 months. Clin PrevDent 1986:8:11-3.
16. Graves RC, Burt BA: The pattern of the carious attack in chidren as a consideration in the use of fissure sealents./ Prev Dent 1975:2:28-32.
17. Hennon DK, Stookey GK, Muhler JC: Prevalence and distrubition of dental caries in preschool children./Am Dent Assoc 1969:79:1405-14.
18. Houpt M, Shey Z: Clinical effectiveness of an auto-polymerrised fissure sealent (Delton) after thirty-three months. Periatr Dent 1978:1:165-8.
19. Houp M, Fuks A, Shapira, Chosack A, Eidelman E: Autopolymerized versus lighp-polymerized fissure sealent./ Am Dent Assoc 1987:115:55-6.
20. Hunter JA: A practical treatise on the diseases of die teeth. London J Johnson, 1778,
21. Hyatt TP: Prophylactic odontomy: the cutting into the tooth for the prevention of disease. Dent Cosmos 1923:65:234-41.
22. Jackson D: The clinical diagnosis of dental caries. BRDentJ 1950:88:207-13.
23. Kidd EAM, Joyston BS: Essentials of dental caries; the disease and its management. Bristol, Wright, 1987.
24. Klein H, Knustson JV: Studies of dental caries. XIII. Effect of ammoniacal silver nitrate on caries in the first permanent molar. J Am Dent Assoc 1942:29:1420-26.
25. Komatsu H, Ikcda T, Ohshima K: Enamel fluoride uptake from glass ionomer cement designed for use as a fissure sealent./jtm/ Conservative Dent 1989:32:688-95.
26. LlodraJC, Bravo M, Dalgado RM, Baca P, Galvez R: Factors influencing the effectiveness of sealents-a metaanalysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993:21:261-9.
27. Lussi A: Validity of diagnostic and treatment decisions of fissure caries. Caries Res 1991:25:296-303.
28. Lussi A: Comparison of different methods for the diagnosis of fissure caries without cavitation. Caries Res 1993:27:409-16.
29. MuCune RJ, Bojanini J, Abodeely RA: Effectiveness of a pit and fissure sealent in the prevention of caries: three year clinical results.//lm Z>enMiioc 1979:99:619-23.
30. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ: A comparative study of two pit and Fissure sealents: six year results in Augusta GA. J Am Dent Assoc 1982:105:237-9.
31. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ: Current sutatus of'scalend retention and caries prevention J Dent Educ 1984:48:18-26.
32. Möller I[, Poulsen S: A standardized .system for diagnosing, recordeng and analyzing dental caries data. ScandJ DentRes 1973:81:1-11.
33. Mueller B, TinanoffN: Enhancig retention of acid etch resin restorations in primary teeth. JPedod 1977:1:263¬71.
34. Muyuzami Y. Suzuki K. Sunada I: A method of diagnosing incipient in pits and fissuris by measuring electrical resistanca./D«if Res 1964:43:941.
35. Newbrun E: Preventing dental caries: Current and prospective stratcgies./Awj Dent Assoc 1992:123:68-73.
36. NIH. Consensus Development Conference Statement. Dental Sealent in thi prevction of tooth decay./Denf Educ 1984:48:126-31.
37. Nordenvall KJ. Brannstrom M, Malmgren O: Etching of deviduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth: a comparison between 15 and 60 seconds of etching. AmJOrOxod 1980:78:99-108.
38. Pincus P: A new method of examination of molar to-
Süt Azı Dişlerinde "Delton ve Helioseal" Fissür Örtücülerin Klinik Güvenilirliklerinin Araştırılması
213
oth grooves for the presence of dental canes. J Physiol 1951:113:13-4.
39. Redford DA- Clarkson EH, Jensen M: The effect of different etching times on the saelent bond strenght, etch depth, and pattern in primary teeth. Pediarl Dent 1986:8:11¬5.
40. Rego MA, Arauja MA: A2 year clinical evaluation of fkiorde-containing pit and fissure sealent placed wiht an in-casive technique. QuintessenceInd 1996:27:99-103.
41. Ripa LW. The current status of pit and fissure sealents: a review./Can DentAssoc 1985:51:367-80.
42. Rock WP: The effectiveness of fissure sealent resins. JDendEduc 1984:48:27-31.
43. Rock WP, Wcathcrill S, Anderson RJ: Retention of three fissure sealent resins. The effests of etching agent and curing method. Results over 3 years. Br Dent J 1990:168:323¬5.
44. Ryge G: Clinical criteria. Br Dent J 1980:30:347-58.
45. Sawel RF, Andlaw Rj: Has occlusal carise become more difficult to diagnose. Br Dent J 1988:164:209-11,
46. Seppa L, Forss H: Resistance of occlusal fissures to demoralization after loss of glass ionomer sealents in vitro. Pediarl Dent 1991:13:39-42.
47. Silverstone LM: The acid etch technique: in vitro sturies with special reference to the enamel surface and the enamel-resin interface. In: Silverstone LM, Dogon IL, eds, Proceedings of an International Symposium of Acid Etch Techniques, st. Paul, Minn.: North Central Publishing Co.; 1975:13-39.
48. Silverstone LM: Fissure sealents: The enamel-resin interface./Public Health Dent 1983:43:205-15.
49. Tandon S, kumari R, Udapa S: the of etch-time on die bond strength of a sealent and on the etch pattern in primary and pcrmcnant enamel: an evaluation. ASDC J Dent Child 1989:56:186-90.
50. Verdonshot EH, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk ROW, König KG, Schacken MJM, Truin GJ: Performance of some diagnostic systems in examinations for small occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res, 1992:26:59-64.
51. Waggoner W, Siegal M: Pit and fissure sealent application: updating the technique./4A4 1996:128:351-61.
52. Weerheiom KL, Amerongen van WE, Eggink CO: The clinical diagnosis of occlusal caries: a problem./fleni Qiild 1989:56:196-200.
53. Weerheijm Kİ, Groen HJ, Bast AJJ, Eijkman MAJ, Amerongen van WE: Clinically undetected occlusal dentine carise: a radiographic comparison. Carise Res, 1992:26:305¬9.
54. WcintraubJ: The effectiveness of pit and fissure sealents. JPublicHealt Dent 1989:49:317-30.
55. Wenzel A, Fejerskoc O, Kidd EJoyston Bechal S, Groenevcld A: Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically by concentional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs. Caries Res 1990:24:324-33.
56. Wenzel A, Larscn MJ, Fejerskov O: Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs and digitized radiograhps. Caries Res 1991:25:365-71.
57. Wenzel A-Fejerskow O: Validily of diagnosis of questionable caries lesion in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars. Caries Res 1992:26:188-94.
58. White GE, Tsamsouris A, Williams DL: Earlv detection of occlusal caries by measuring the electrical resistance of the tooth. JDent Res 1978:57:195-200.
59. Wilson IP: Preventive Dcnstistry 1985:/3e«f Digest 1:70-2.
60. Wright GZ: A comparison between atitopolvmeri-zing and visible light activated sealents. Clin Prev Dent 1988:10:14-7.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com