Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

FARKLI SERAMİK TAMİR SİSTEMLERİ İLE SERAMİK MATERYALİ ARASINDAKİ BAĞLANMANIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

EVALUATION OF BONDING STRENGTH OF DIFFERENT CERAMIC REPAIR SYSTEMS TO CERAMIC MATERIALS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1997

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this research was to detertnine the bond strength values of VMK 68 ceramic material to ceramic repair materials, trade named as Cimara, Monobond-S, Silistor, Scotchbond, Clearfil activator and Porcelain repair primer. The changes in the bond strength values related to time were also evaluated. Each repair system were applied to the samples and all tlie samples were left in 37"C water and had thermocycling before force application. Shearing force was applied to 10 samples of each system after 30 days. At the end of 1 and 30 days the kigliest bond strength values were obtained with Scotchbond followed by Silistor, Porcelain repair primer, Clearfil activator, Cimara and Monobond S in decreasing order. The results were evaluated using t testi for paired samples. According to the results there was a significant increase in the bond strenght value of Silistor porcelain repair material at the end of 30 days. On the other hand mere was a significant decrease in Monobond-S and Porcelain repair piimer systems at the end 30 days. ScoctcJtbond and Clearfil activator systems have also displayed simitar bond strenth values
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yapılmış olan çalışmada; Cimara, Monobond-S, Silis-tor, Scotchprime, Clearfİl Activator ve Porcelain repair primer seramik tamir sistemleri ile VMK 68 seramik materyali arasındaki bağlanma dayanıklılığını ve zaman içerisinde bu dayanıklılık değerleri arasındaki değişimi belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Herb ir sistemin uygu/andığı örnek/erden 10'ar adedi bir gün, 10'ar adedi otuz gün 37°C sıcaklıkdaki suda bekletilip, ısıl döngü uygulandıktan sonra seramik-kompozit birleşimine makaslama kuvveti uygulanmıştır. Birinci ve otuzuncu günün sonunda en yüksek bağlanma dayanıklılık değeri Scotchprime tamir sisteminde, daha sonra sırasıyla Silistor, Porcelain repair primer, Clearfİl activator, Cimara ve Monobond-S'de belirlenmiştir. Birinci ve otuzuncu günün sonunda elde edilen değerler Eşli serilerde t testi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Test sonuçlarına göre; Silistor seramik tamir sisteminde otuzuncu günün sonunda bağlanma dayanıklılığında anlamh bir artış olduğu; Cimara, Monobond S ve Porcelain repair pri-mer'de otuz gün sonra anlamlı düşüş olduğu; Scotc-hbond ve Clearfİl aetivator'un otuzuncu günün sonunda ilk değerlerine benzer ortalama bağlama dayanıklılık değerleri verdiği belirlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-farkli-seramik-tamir-sistemleri-ile-seramik-materyali-arasindaki-baglanmanin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 4
223
228
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW. bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems./Fhwftef Dent 1993: 7ft 6¬11.
2. BaileyJH. Porcelain to composite bond strengts using Four organosilane materials./ftosftef Dent 1989: 61: 174-7.
3. Beck DA, Janus CE, Douglass HB. Shear bond strength of composite resin porcelain repair materials bonded to metal and porcelain./ftorfftef Denf 1990: 64: 529-33.
4. Bello JA, Myers ML, Graser GN, Jarvis RH. Bond strength and microleakage of porcelain repair materials./ ProsthetDent 1985: 54: 788-91.
5. Bcrksun S, Kedici S, Sağlam S. Repair of fractured porcelain restorations with composite bonded porcelain laminate contours./fWfcef Dent 1993: 69. 457-8.
6. Berksun S, Sağlam S. Shear strength of composite bonded porcelain to porcelain İn a new repair system JProst-het Dent 1994; 71: 423-8.
7. Bieniek K, Marx R, Mulert CV. Susteme zur intraora-len reparatur von keramischen verblendungen-eine in-vitro studie der haftfestigkeit. ZWR 1991: 11: 848-52.
8. Burke FJT, Grey NJA. Repair of fractured porcelain units: alternative approaches. Br Dent J1994:176: 251-6.
9. Cardoso AC, Filho PS. Clinical and laboratory techniques For repair of fractured porcelain in fixed prostheses: A case report Quint Int 194: 25: 835-8.
10. Cochran MA, Carlson Tj, Moore BK, Richmond NL, Bracket! WW. Tensile bond strengths of Five porcelain repair systems. Op dent 1988: 13: 162-7.
11. Cohen B, WeinerS. Restoration of fixed partial dentures with fractured porcelain veneers using an overcasting./ ProsfhetDent 1989: 62: 390-2.
12. Demets A. Reparation in vivo de protheses Fixes par Facettes. Kev Beige Med Dent 1993: 2 28-31.
13. Diaz-Arnold AM, Aquilino SA. An evaluation of the bond strengths of Four organosilane materials in response to thermal stress. JProsihet Dent 1989: 62: 257-60.
14. Diaz-Arnold AM, Schneider RL, Aquilino SA. Bond strengths oF intaoral porcelain repair materials. / Prosthet Dent 1989: 61: 305-9.
15. Endo Y, Aoki H, Kanematsu K. Tamaki K, Watanabe H, Yamamura M, Fujita T Fracture of ceramic surface in porcelain fused to metal crown. Butt ofKanagawa Dent Col 1987: 15: 147-8.
16. FerrandoJP, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Jarvis RH. Tensile strength and microleakage of porcelain repair materials. JProsihet Dent 1983: 5ft 44-50.
17. Jochen DG, Caputo AA. Composite resin repair of porcelain denture teeth. 1977: 38: 673-9.
18. Kolodney H, Puckett AD, Kistenmacher BJ, Weems MD. Effect of heat curing cycle and gypsum comtamination on die bond strengths of composite bonded to a silane-trea-ted alloy./fW/ief Dent 1993: 7ft 474-8.
19. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Karkmeier WW, Wiiwerding TM, Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite to porcelain repair. / Prosthet Dent 1996: 76: 119-24.
20. Lacy AM. Clinical techniques for intraoral repair of
228
Değer S. Canihlioğlu M B Saadet F
fractured porcelain when metal is exposed. Quint Int 1989: 20: 595-8,
21. Matsumura H, Kawahara M, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. A new repair system with a silane coupler, ferric chloride and adhesive opaque resm./Denf Res 1989: 68: 813-8.
22. Newburg R, Pameijer CH. Composite resins bonded to porcelain with silane solution. JADA1978: 96: 288-91.
23. Nowlin TP, Barghi N, Morling BK. Evaluation of the bonding of three porcelain repair systems. /Prosthet Denl 1981: 46: 516-8.
24. Pratt RC, Burgess JO, Schwartz RS, Smith JH. Evaluation of bond strength of six porcelain repair systems. J Frost-ket Dent 1989: 62: 11-3.
25. SemmelmanJO, Kulp PR. Silane bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic. JADA 1968: 76: 69-73.
26. Suliman AA, Swift EJ, PerdigaoJ. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength or composite resin to porcelain. JProstket Dent 1993: 7ft 118-2:1.
27. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, WieKyerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1994: 72: 355-66.
28. Yoshida K, Kaira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect ol adhesive metal primers on bonding a prosthetic composite resin to metal J Prosthet Dent 1993: 69. 357-62.
29. Zaimoğlu A, Özden N, Akaltan F, Imırzalıoğiu P. Bond strength of porcelain repair material*. 79th Annual World Dental Congress of FDt, Milan, Italy, 1991.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com