Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ÇÜRÜK AKTİVİTE - RİSK BELİRLEME YÖNTEMLERİNDE SON YENİLİKLER

CARIES ACTIVITY TESTS AND RISK FACTORS IN CARIES

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Many factors play role in the development of dental caries. When these factors are studied; ctiologic factors, external and internal factors and the role of genetics must be discussed together. Dentists should detect the symptoms that can cause a disease and apply a need-related therapy to prevent caries. With this aim, caries activity tests arc being used. Latest studies investigating caries activity tests aim to develop; more reliable, quicker and cheaper techniques.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Diş çürüklerinin oluşmasında birçok elken rol oynamaktadır. Bu etkenler incelendiğinde; birçok eliyolojik faktörler, dış etkenler ve iç etkenlerle birlikte genetiğin rolü de değerlendirilmelidir. Diş hekimine düşen görev; klinik belirltilcrle birlikte hastalığa yol açan bu etkenleri belirlemek ve ileride hastalığın tekrarlama riskini önleyecek ihtiyaca dayalı tedaviyi uygulamaktır. Bu amaçla; çürük aktivite testleri yapılmaktadır. Son yıllarda çürük aktivite testleriyle ilgili yapılan çalışmalarda amaç çürük aktiviıesini en kısa zamanda en doğru sonucu veren en ucuz yöntemi geliştirmek yönündedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-curuk-aktivite-risk-belirleme-yontemlerinde-son-yenilikler.pdf
  • 1-2
33
40
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Axellson P. Diagnosis and risk prediction of dental caries. Quintessence Pub Co, Inc. Chicago. 2000.
2. Axellson P. A four point scale for selection of caries risk patients, based on salivary S.mutans level and plaque formation rate index. In: Johnson N. Risk Markers for Oral Diseases. Vol 1. Dental Caries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1991.
3.
Külekçi G. Diş çürüğüne çağdaş yaklaşım. Bilim Teknik 2003: 273: 11.
4. Reich E, Lussi A, Newbrun E. Caries-risk assessment. Int Dent J 1999: 49: 15-26.
5.
Sepet E, Aktören O. Çocuklarda risk faktörlerinin belirlenmesi. Diş Hek Klinik 2003; 16(1): 13-22
6. Messer LB. Assessing caries risk in children. Aust Dent J. 2000; 45 (1):10-16.
7. Bretz WA, Corby P, Schork N, Hart TC. Evidence of a contribution of genetic factors to dental caries risk. J Evid Base Dent Pract 2003: 3: 185-9.
8. Schuler CF. Inherited risks for susceptibility to dental caries. J Dent Edu 2001; 65 (10): 1038¬45.
9. İlhan D. Mikrobiyal Dental Plak. Diş Hek Klinik 2003: 16(1): 34-38.
10. http://www.dent.ucla.edu/pic/members/microbio /mdphome.html 21/11/2005
11. http://www.whocollab.od.mah.se/expl/ohiintrod. html 21/11/2005
12. Carter K. Landini G, Walsley AD. Automated quantification of dental plaque accumulation using digital imaging. J Dent 2004: 32: 623-628.
13. Carvalho J, Ekstrand K, Thlstrup A. Dental plaque and caries on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molar in relation to stage of eruption. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 773-779.
14. Dahan M, Timmerman MF, Van Winkelhoff AJ. Van der Velden U. The effect of periodontal treatment on the salivary bacterial load and early plaque formation. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31:972-977.
15. Rowshani B, Timmerman MF, Van der Velden U. Plaque development in relation to the periodontal condition and bacterial load of the saliva. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 214-218.
16. Pearce EIF, Dong Y-M, Yue L, Gao X-J, Purdie GL, Wang J-D. Plaque minerals in the prediction of caries activity. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002; 30: 61-9.
17. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN et al. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol 2005: 43 (11): 5721-5732.
18. White GE, Armaleh MT. Tongue scraping as a means of reducing oral mutans streptococci. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004; 28 (2): 163-67.
19. Tanner ACR, Milgrom PM, Kent R, Mokeem SA, Page RC, Riedy CA, Weinstein P, Bruss J. The microbiota of young children from tooth and tongue samples. J Dent Res 2002; 81 (1): 53-57.
20. Seki M, Karakamaa F, Terajimaa T, Ichikawaa Y, Ozakib T, Yoshidab S, Yamashitaa Y. Evaluation of mutans streptococci in plaque and saliva: correlation with caries development in preschool children. J Dent 2003; 31: 283-290.
21. Vanobbergen J, Martens L, Lesaffre E, Bogaerts K, Declerck D. Assessing risk indicators for dental caries in the primary dentition. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001; 29: 424-34.
22. Lindquist B, Emilson CG, Wennerholm K. Relationship between mutans streptococci in saliva and their colonization of the tooth surfaces. Oral Microbiol Immun 1989: 4 (2): 71¬6.
40
Banu İLHAN. Işın ULUKAPI
23. Jensen B, Brathall D. A new method for the estimation of mutans streptococci in human saliva. J Dent Res 1989; 68 (3): 468-71.
24. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Policy on use of a caries-risk assessment tool (CAT) for infants, children and adolescents. Pediatr Dent 2002; 25: 25-27.
25. Schiffner U, Torres-Quintero A. Reproducibility of a new caries risk test under different oral conditions. Clin Oral Invest 2005: 9: 187-191.
26.
Saydam GB. Karbonhidratlar ve diş çürüğü ilişkisi ve sağlık eğitiminde beslenme bilgisi. TDBD 1998;44:26-35.
27.
Yücel T. Çürükten korunmada beslenmenin önemi. TDBD 1998; 44: 36-37.
28. Petersen PE. Sociobehavioural risk factors in dental caries-international perspectives. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005; 33: 274-9.
29. Schou L, Cunie C, McQueen D. Using a "lifestyle" perspective to understand toothbrushing behaviour in Scottish.Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1990: 18 (5): 230-4.
30. Habibian M, Beighton D, Stevenson R, Lawson M, Roberts G. Relationships between dietary behaviours, oral hygiene and mutans streptococci in dental plaque of a group of infants in southern England. Archi Oral Biol 2002:47:491-498.
31. Dodds MW, Johnson DA, Yeh CK. Health • benefits of saliva: a review. J Dent 2005; 33 (3):
223-33.
32.
Doğan F. Tükürük akış hızının azalmasının ağız-diş sağlığı açısından önemi ve tedavisi. TDBD 1998: 44: 19-25.
33.
Erten H. Tükürüğün ağız-diş sağlığı açısından önemi ve koruyucu fonksiyonları. GÜ Diş Ilek Fak Derg 2003; 20 (1): 61-65.
34. Kitasako Y. Moritsuka M, Foxton RM. Ikeda M, Tagami J, Nomura S. Simplified and quantitative saliva buffer capacity test using a hand-held pH meter. Am J Dent 2005; 18 (3): 147-50.
35. Tenevuo J. Salivary parameters of relevance for assessing caries activity in individuals and populations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Feb; 25 (1): 82-6
36. Lee SR, Kwon HK, Song KB, Choi YH. Dental caries and salivary immunoglobulin A in Down syndrome children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;40 (9-10): 530-3.
37. Çoğulu D, Sabah E. Kutukculer N, Ozkinay F. Evaluation of the relationship between caries indices and salivary secretory IgA, salivary pH, buffering capacity and flow rate in children with Down's syndrome. Arch Oral Biol. 2005; 21:
38. Lindsten R, Ogaard B, Larsson E. Dental arch space and permanent tooth size in the mixed dentition of a skelatal sample from the 14th to the 19th centruries and 3 contemporary samples. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Jul; 122 (1): 48-58.
39. Aoba T. Solubility properties of human tooth mineral and pathogenesis of dental caries. Oral Dis2004; 10 (5): 249-57.
40. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Ruben J, Dijkman T, Arends J. Microradiographic study of demineralization of shark enamel in a human caries model. Scand J Dent Res. 1988 Jun; 96 (3): 209-11 .(abstr)

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com