Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ELEKTROMANYETİK ALANIN (EMA) KEMİK DEFEKTLERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ

EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS (EMF) ON HEALING OF THE BONE DEFECTS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Many different theories are disscused for the use of electromagnetic fields lor the cure of many diseases in the science field . Scientists are trying to find out the exact mechanism of the magnetic fields. Especially the ones that are natural and can be seen in our daily I i fes plays an important role. The aim of using electromagnetic fields is to mimic the natural healing thus the nature. It is a well known hypothesis that the exact mechanism of the all metabolisms in the body, can be a result of low magnetic fields occuring by the electrical actions. In the experimental studies healing of the bony defects by the means of electromagnetic fields are well discribed. In our study we evaluated the effects of electromagnetic fields in the healing of bony defects with the literature findings between the years 1974-2000
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Elektromanyetik alanların tedavi amacıyla birçok hastalıkta kullanımı eski çağlara dayanmakla ve ilginç, teorilere rastlanılmaktadır. Araştırmacılar yüzyıllardır manyetizmanın etkilerinin sırrını çözmeye çalışmaktadırlar. Özellikle doğada bulunan ve günlük yaşamımızda içinde olduğumuz doğal manyetik güçler canlı hayatı için bizim fark etmediğimiz ama çok önemli yapıtaşlarını oluşturmaktadır. Elektromanyetik alan uygulamasında amaç. doğal iyileşme sürecini yani doğayı taklit etmektir. İnsan metabolizmasında bulunan ve bir çok metaboiik aktiviteyi kontrol altında tutan mekanizmanın elektriksel yükler ve bunların oluşturduğu düşük elektrik akımları olduğu günümüzde kabul gören bir hipotezdir.Yapılan bir çok deneysel çalışmada EMA'ların kemik iyileşmesini arttırdığı gözlenmiştir. Bu makalede 1974-2000 yılları arasında EMA'ların kemik defeklcrinin ve kırıklarının iyileşmesinde kullanımı ile ilgili literatür bilgisinin sonuçları özetlendi.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-elektromanyetik-alanin-ema-kemik-defektleri-uzerine-etkileri.pdf
  • 3
17
23
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. AAron RK,
Ciombo
r DK, Simon BJ. Treatment of nonunions with electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop 2004;419: 21-29.
2. Bassett CAL, Chokshi HR. Hernandez E, Pawluk RJ, Strop M. The effect of pulsing electromagnetic fields on cellular calcium and calcification of non-unions. In C.T. Brighton J., Black S.R. Pollack [eds.]. Electrical properties of bone and cartilage, experimental effects and clinical application. New York, Grune Stratum. 427-441, 1979.
3. Bassett CAL. Mitchell SN. Gaston SR. Pulsing electromagnetic field treatment in ununited fractures and failed arthrodeses. JAMA. 11->S2:
. 247: 623-628.
4. Bassett CAL. Mitchell SN. Schink MM. Treatment of therapeutically resistant nonunions with bone grafts and pulsing electromagnetic fields. The journal of bone and joint surgery 1982:64(8): 1214-1220.
5. Bassett CAL. Valdes M. Hernandez E. Modification of fracture repair with selected pulsing electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64: 888-895.
6. Bassett CAL. The development and application of pulsed electromagnetic fields for ununited fractures and arthrodeses. Orthop Clin North Am 1984; 15: 61- 87.
7. Brighton C, Hozack W. Brager M. et al. Fracture healing in the rabbit fibula when subjected to various capacitively coupled electrical fields. J Orthop Res. 1985: 3: 331¬340. Bassett CAL. Valdes M. Hernandez E. Modification of fracture repair with selected pulsing electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64: 888-895.
8. Colson DJ, Browett JP, Fiddian NJ, Watson B. Treatment of delayed non-union of fractures using PEMF. J Biomed Eng 1988; 10 (4): 301¬304.
9.
Çağlar 0. Darbeli gürültü tarzındaki elektro-magnetik alanın taze kırıklarda kırık iyileşmesi üzerine etkileri: deneysel araştırma. Uzmanlık Tezi, İstanbul Üniv. Tıp Fakültesi 1991; İstanbul.
10.
Durmuş A. Tip I kompleks rejyonel ağrı sendromunda pulse elektromanyetik alan tedavisinin etkinliği. Uzmanlık Tezi. 1999.
11. Eyres KS, Saleh M, Kaniş JA. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone formation and bone loss during limb lengthening. Bone 1996; 18: 505-509.
12. Ferndale R, Murray JC. Pulsed electromagnetic fields promote collagen production in bone marrow fibroblasts via athermal mechanisms. Calcif Tissue Int 1985; 37: 178-182.
13. Fitzsimmons R.I. Farley J, Adey WR. Baylink DJ. Frequency dependence of increased cell proliferation, in vivo, in exposures to a low-amplitude, low frequency electric field. J Cell Physiol 1989; 139: 586-591.
14. Fredericks DC. Nepola JV, Baker JT et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone healing in a rabbit tibial osteotomy model. J Orthop Trauma 2000; 14 (2): 93-100.
15. Fredericks DC. Petersen EB, Piehl D.I. et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic and combined magnetic fields on osteotomies. .1 Orthop Trauma 2004.
10. Freidenberg Z. Brighton C. Michelson .1. et al. The effects of demineralized bone matrix and direct current on an in vitro culture of bone marrow cells. J Orthop Res 1989; 7: 22-27.
17. Funk RH. Monsees TK. Effects of electromagnetic fields on cells: physiological and therapeutical approaches and molecular mechanisms of interaction. A review. Cells Tissues Organs. 2006; 182 (2): 59-78.
18. Gossling HR. Bernstein RA. Abbott J. Treatment of ununited tibial fractures: A comparison of surgery and PEMF. Orthopedics 1992; 15 (6): 711-719.
19. Hanks C. Geister D. Kim J, et al. DNA synthesis in fetal rat calvarium cells stimulated by microprocessor generated signals. Trans Bioelectric Rep Growth Soe 1981.
Burak ÇANKAYA, Mehmet Ali ERDEM. Okhan ORAL. Mehmet YALT1RIK. Çetin KASAPOĞLU. Cüneyt Kornan ORAL
22
20. Hanley K, Norton L, Rodan G. Electromagnetic field effects on periosteal and osteoblast like cells growth in culture. J Dent Res 1981; 60: 402.
2 1. Hartig M. Joos U. Wiesmann HP. Capacitevely coupled electric fields accelerate proliferation of osteoblast like primary cells and increase bone extracellular matrix formation in vitro. Eur Biophys J 2000: 29: 499-506.
22. Heckman JD. Ingram AJ. Loyd RD, et al. Nonunion treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop 1981: 161: 58-66.
23. Inoue N, Ohnishil, Chen D. et al. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on late phase osteotomy gap healing in a canine tibial model. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 1106-1114.
24. Janssen J, Akkerman L, Wittebol P. The effect of electrical stimulation on embryonic rat calvaria in vitro. Electrical Properties of Bone and Cartilage. New York: Grune and Stratton 1979:491-517.
25.
Kılıçoğlu SS. Mikroskopi düzeyinde kırık iyileşmesi. Ankara Üniv. Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 2002; 55: 143-150.
26. Korenstein R, Somjen D. Fischler H, et al. Capacitive pulsed electrical stimulation of bone cells, induction of cAMP changes and DNA synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1984; 803: 302-307.
27. Li JK, Lin JC, Liu HC, Sun JS, Ruaan RC, Shih C. Chang WH. Comparison of ultrasound and electromagnetic field effects on osteoblast growth.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 May; 32 (5): 769-75.
28. Luben RA. Cain CD. Chen MC et al. Effects of electromagnetic stimuli on bone and bone cells tn-vitro: inhibition of responses to parathyroid hormone by low energy low frequency fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1982; 79: 4180-4184.
29. Lynch AF. MacAuley P. Treatment of bone non-union by electromagnetic theraphy. IJIV1S 1985; 154(4): 153-155.
30. Moran D, Bassett CAL. Charge-change interactions: Do they explain the avascularite of cartilage? Trans Orthop Res Soc 1982; 7: 88.
31. Murray JC, Farndale RW. Modulation of collagen production in cultured fibroblasts by a low-frequency, pulsed magnetic field. Biochim Biophys Acta 1985; 28.
32. Norden B. Ratnel C. Interaction mechanisms of low level electromagnetic fields in living
systems. Magnetic Field and Cancer 1992; Capter 2: Oxford: Oxford University Pres. 14¬21.
33. Norton L, Bourret L. Majeska R, et al. Adherence and DNA synthesis changes in hard tissue cell culture produced by electrical pertubation. New York: Grune and Stratton: 1979; 443-454.
34. Orzan C. Lomber spondilartrozda
ço
k düşük frekanslı pulse elektromanyetik alan tedavisinin etkinliği. Uzmanlık Tezi. Ege Univ. Tıp Fakültesi 2001; İzmir.
35. Otter MW. McLeod KJ. Rubin CT. Effects of electromagnetic fields in experimental fracture repair. Clin Orthop Retat Res 1998; Oct: 90¬104.
36. Parkinson CW. Comments on the use of electromagnetic fields in biological studies. Calcif Tissue Int 1985; 37: 198-207.
37. Petersson C, Holmar N. Johnell O. Electrical stimulation of osteogenesis: studies of the cathode effect on rat femur. Acta Orthop Scand 1982; 53: 727-732.
38. Pilla AA. Electrochemical information transfer and its possible role in the control of cell function. Electrical Properties Of Bone And Cartilage Experimental Effects And Clinical Applications. New York, 455-488, 1979.
39. Rubin CT. Hausman MR. The cellular basis of Wolffs Law. Orthopedic Surgery and Degenerative Arthritis 1988; 14 (3): 503-515.
40. Ryaby JT. Clinical effects of electromagnetic and electric fields on fracture healing. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998; 355S: 205-215.
41. Saffer JD. Thurstan SJ. Cancer risk and electromagnetic fields. NatureI995; 375: 22-23.
42. Sert C, Deniz M, Düz MZ ve ark. The preventive effect on bone loss of 50-Hz, lmT electromagnetic field in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Metab 2002; 20: 345- 349.
43. Sharrard WJW. Sutcliffe ML. Robson M.I. Maceachcrn AG. flic treatment of fibrous nonunion of fractures by pulsing electromagnetic stimulation. J Bone and Joint Surgery 1982; 64 (2): 189-193.
44. Steinberg ME. Busenkell GL,Black J. Korostoff H. Stress induced potentials in moist bone in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg. 1974. June; 56 (4): 704-713.
45. Takano YT. Kawakami M, Sakuda M. Effect of a pulsing electromagnetic field on deminerali-
Elektromanyetik Alanın (EMA) Kemik Defektleri Üzerine Etkileri
23
zed bone matrix induced bone formation in bony defect in the premaxilla of rats. J Dent Res 1992; 71 (12): 1920-1925.
46. Troek DH, Bollet AJ. Dyer RH, et al. A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis. J Rhematol 1993; 20; 2166-2167.
47. Trock DH. Electromagnetic fields and magnets. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America 2000; 26 (1): 51-62.
48. Yonemori K, Matsunaga S. İshıdou Y et al. Early effects of elecrical stmulation on osteogenesis. Bone 1996; 19 (2): 173-180.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com