Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

SELF-ADESIF REÇİNE SIMANLAR

SELF-ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
New generation luting ajents have a lot of advantages such as; unnecessity to use etch, primer and bonding during application, less technique sensitivity and time, elimination of post operative sensitivity, fluoride release and to have wide range of indications. In-vitro tests resulted that self-adhesive resin cements have satisfactory adhesion to dentin and restorative materials. However, adhesion to enamel is less than the others. The aim of this review is to assess the literature about self-adhesive resin cements and their properties, application, adhesion to tooth structure(enamel, dentin, root dentin) and restorative materials (endodontic posts, ceramics, titanium abutments), marginal adaptation, microleakage, mechanic properties, biocompability, chemical adhesion, fluoride release and fractures published so far.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yeni nesil yapıştırıcı ajanların avantajları, uygulamada asit primer ve bonding gerektirmemesi, teknik hassasiyetin azalması, dişte oluşabilecek post operatif hassasiyetin ortadan kaldırılabilmesi, daha az zaman gerektirmesi, fluor salınımı yapması ve geniş bir endikasyon alanı bulmasıdır. In-vitro sonuçlara göre self-adesif simanın dentine ve çeşitli restoratif materyallere olan adezyonu tatmin edicidir. Ancak mineye bağlanma özelliklerinin daha zayıf olduğu görülmektedir. Bu derlemenin amacı, self-adesif simanlar hakkında yapılan çalışmaların değerlendirilmesi ile özelliklerini, kullanımlarım ve diş dokularına adezyon (mine, dentin ve kök dentini), restoratif materyallere olan adezyonu (endodontik postlar, seramikler, titanyum abutmanlar). marjinal adaptasyon, mikrosızıntı, mekanik özellikler, biyouyumluluk, kimyasal adezyon ve fluor salınımı, kırık oluşumu açısından değerlendiren takip çalışmalarını incelemektir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-self-adesif-recine-simanlar.pdf
  • 3-4
31
40
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 135¬141.
2. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 280-301.
3. Radovic I,
Monticell
i F, Goracci C, Vulicevic R, Ferrari M. Self-Adhesive Resin Cements:A
Literure Review. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10:251¬258.
4.
Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 2005; 9: 161-167.
5. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and
dentin. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 963-971.
6. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces.
J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 327-335.
7. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater
2007; 23: 71-80.
8.
Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Comparison of shear bond strength of two self-etch primer/adhesive systems. Angle Orthod
2006; 76: 123-126.
9. Bishara SE, Ostby AW, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF,
Warren JJ. Early shear bond strength of a one-step self-adhesive on orthodontic brackets.
Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 689-693.
10. Vicente A, Bravo LA, Romero M, Ortiz AJ, Canteras M. A comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin cement and two orthodontic resin adhesive systems. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 109-113.
11. Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater 2007; 23:
829-839.
12. Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J
Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 551-558.
13. Escribano N, de la Macorra JC. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 337-341.
14. Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM,
Raigrodski AJ. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J
Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 104-114.
15. Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer HC. Long-term bond between dualpolymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue.
Dent Mater 2007; 23: 211-217.
16. Walter R, Miguez PA, Pereira PN. Microtensile bond strength of luting materials to coronal and root dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17: 165¬171.
17. Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater
2006; 22: 45-56.
18. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004; 83:
454-458.
19. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet
Dent 2003; 89: 268-274.
20. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent
2000; 13: 255-260.
21. Mjör IA, Smith MR, Ferrari M, Mannocci F. The structure of dentine in the apical region of human teeth. Int Endod J 2001;34:346-353.
22. Balbosh A, Ludwig K, Kern M. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 227¬233.
23. Bateman GJ, Lloyd CH, Chadwick RG,
Saunders WP. Retention of quartzfibre endodontic posts with a self-adhesive dual cure resin cement. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent
2005; 13: 33-37.
24. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on
Self-Adesif Reçine Simanlar
39
bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 809-818.
25. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR,
Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;
30: 627-635.
26. Sadek FT, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Grandini S,
Cury AH, Tay F, Ferrari M. Immediate and 24¬hour evaluation of the interfacial strengths of
fiber posts. J Endod 2006; 32: 1174-1177.
27. Bitter K, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth-colored posts. J
Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 302-310.
28. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J
Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 265-273.
29. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu PK. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 128-133.
30. Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Valandro LF, Gutierrez-Aceves G, Bolanos-Carmona MV, Del Castillo-Salmeron R, Bottino MA. Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 412¬417.
31. Reich SM, Wichmann M, Frankenberger R, Zajc D. Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of three resin cements to a machinable feldspatic ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 74: 740-746.
32. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 248-255.
33. Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hâmmerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2006;
22: 195-200.
34. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. The shear bond strength between luting cements and zirconia ceramics after two pre-treatments.
Oper Dent 2005; 30: 382-388.
35. Wolfart M, Wolfart S, Kern M. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial
implants 2006; 21: 519-525.
36. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handel G. Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 191-197.
37. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: Marginal quality of self-etch and etchand- rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 185-191.
38. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent
Mater 2004; 20: 463-469.
39. Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Bertelli E, Monticelli F, Grandini S, Ferrari M. In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays.
J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 33-40.
40. Ibarra G, Johnson GH, Geurtsen W, Vargas MA. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement.
Dent Mater 2007; 23: 218-225.
41. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater 2005;21:445-453
42. Wilson AD, Prosser HJ, Powis DM. Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolyte cements to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 590-592.
43. Baldissara P, Valandro LF, Monaco C, Ferrari M, Bottino MA, Scotti R. Fatigue resistance of the bond of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic to human dentin. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 97-104.
44. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 357-363.
45. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC. Mechanical properties of luting cements after water storage.
Oper Dent 2003; 28: 535-542.
46. Uy JN, Lian JN, Nicholls JI, Tan KB. Load-
fatigue performance of gold crowns luted with resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 315¬322.
47. Burke FJ, Fleming GJ, Abbas G, Richter B. Effectiveness of a self-adhesive resin luting system on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentinbonded crowns. Eur J Prosthodont
Restor Dent 2006; 14: 185-188.
40
48. Komine F, Tomic M, Gerds T, Strub JR. Influence of different adhesive resin cements on the fracture strength of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92:
359-364.
49. de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Randall RC.
Human pulp response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations. Dent Mater 2006; 22:
954-962.
50. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J
Dent Res 2000; 79: 709-714.
51. Gerth
HU
, Dammaschke T, Zürcher H, Schâfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of
Çınar Çilingir A., Gömeç Y.
RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites-A comparative study. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 934¬941.
52. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent
Mater 2007; 23: 343-362.
53. Burke FM, Ray NJ, McConnell RJ. Fluoride-containing restorative materials. Int Dent J
2006; 56: 33-43.
54. Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, Richter B. A practice-based evaluation of the handling of a new self-adhesive universal resin luting material. Int
Dent J 2006; 56:142-146.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com