Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

AMALGAM RESTORASYONLARIN FARKLI BAĞLAYICI AJAN VE MATERYALLER İLE ONARIMININ KENAR UYUMU AÇISINDAN MİKROSIZINTI YÖNTEMİ İLE İNCELENMESİ

Repair of Amalgam Restorations With Bonding Agent and Différent Materials, and Evaluation of Marginal Integrity With Microleakage Method

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The aim of the studt was to evaluate the performance of the repair of old amalgam restorations with different materials and material combinations regarding the microlekage. Material and Methods: Occlusal cavities were prepared on 40 caries free molar and filled. After storage time of 90 days in water in room temperature for aging, repair cavities were prepared adjacent to aged amalgam restorations.Teeth were divided into 4 equal groups before placing the repair restorations. All the restored and repaired teeth were subjected to the thermocycling and loadcycling.They were immersed in 0.5% basic fucsin for 24h at 37°C and then were sectioned using Isomet. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: No difference in microleakage at the interface between old amalgam and repaired amalgam was found between the groups. Conclusion: Using Amalgambond Plus and Ormocer or Amalgambond Plus and Flowable Ormocer and Ormocer combination to repair small defects at the occlusal amalgam restoration leads a better performance regarding microlekage if it is compared with the repair restorations using Amalgam or Amalgambond Plus and Amalgam.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Eski bir amalgam(EA) restorasyona farklı materyal ve materyal kombinasyonu ile tamir yapıldığında performansın mikrosızıntı kriterlerine göre değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 40 adet çürüksüz büyük azı dişinde amalgam restorasyonlar yapıldı. Amalgam restorasyonlar 90 gün süre ile su içinde bekletilerek eskitildi. Eskitilen amalgam resto-rasyonların bukkal bölgesine santral fossada tamir kaviteleri açıldı. 4 grupta farklı tamir işlemleri yapıldı. Örnekler dönüşümlü ısı uygulaması ve dönüşümlü yük yüklemesi işlemleri sonrasında %0.5'lik bazik fuksinde 24 saat 37° C de bekletildi. Dişlerden tamir bölgesini içerecek şekilde bukko-lingual yönde 3'er kesit alındı ve kesit yüzeylerinde mikrosızıntı stereomikroskopta EA/ Tamir Restorasyonu, Tamir Restorasyonu /Diş(D),EA /D ara yüzeylerinde incelendi. Kayıt edilen skorların istatistiksel değerlendirmesi pearson-ki kare testi ile yapıldı. Bulgular: Eski amalgam ile her gruptaki tamir restorasyonu ara yüzeylerindeki mikrosızıntı, gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark göstermemektedir. Sonuç: Oklüzal amalgamlarda yapılacak onarımlarda Amalgambond kullanılarak yalnızca Ormocer ya da akışkan Ormocer-Ormocer kombinasyonu seçildiğinde, yalnızca amalgam yada Amalgambond Plus kullanılarak yapılan tamirlerden mikrosızıntı açısından daha başarılı sonuç alınmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-amalgam-restorasyonlarin-farkli-baglayici-ajan-materyaller-ile-onariminin-kenar-uyumu-acisindan-mikrosizinti-yontemi-ile-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 2
21
39
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Shari
f MO, Merry A, Catleugh M, Tickle M, Brunton P, Dunne SM, Aggarwal VR. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010; 17: 2-3.
2.
Kaman
n WK, Gangler P. Filling repair and repair fillings. Schweiz Monatsschr Zah-nmed, 2000; 110: 1054-71.
3.
Blu
m IR Hafiana K, Curtis A, Barbour ME, Attin T, Lynch CD, Jagger DC. The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam. J Dent, 2012; 40: 15-21.
4. 4.
Hicke
l R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent, 2001; 3: 45-64.
5.
Moncad
a G, Fernandez E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjör I, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent, 2008; 33: 258-64.
6. Mjör
IA
. Placament and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent, 1981; 6: 49-54.
7. Mjör
IA
. Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J, 1993;
43: 466-72.
8. Mjör
IA
, Jokstad A, Qvist V. Longevity of posterior restorations. Int Dent J, 2001;
40: 11-17.
9.
Mjo
r IA, Qvist V. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations. J Dent, 1997 Jan; 25: 25-30.
10.
Deligeorg
i V, Mjor IA, Wilson NH.
B. Can Yaman, F. Koray
An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Prim Dent Care, 2001; 8: 5-11.
11.
Tob
i H, Kreulen CM, Vondeling H, van Amerongen WE. Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and amalgam in the replacement of amalgam Class II restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 1999; 27: 137-43.
12.
Hois
e MA, Miranda FJ, Duncanson MG. Effect of amalgambond on flexural bond strength of amalgam. J Dent Res, 1991;
70: 300.
13. Dörter C. Amalgam Dolgularda Oluşan Defektlerin Farklı Bonding Ajanlar Aracılığıyla, Aynı ya da Farklı Materyalle Onarımı ve Sonuçlarının Tutuculuk Açısından Karşılaştırmalı Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Doktora Tezi, LÜ Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Diş Hastalıkları ve Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı Konsevatif Diş Tedavisi Bilim Dalı, 1994.
14. Dörter C, Koray F, Duman İ Amalgam repair with dentin adhesives. J Dent Res, 1997; 76: 1104.
15. Dörter
C
, Koray F, Duman İ Flexural bond strength of amalgam repair. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 1227.
16.
Leelawa
t C, Scherer W,Chang J. Addi-tons of fresh amalgam to existing amalgam: microleakage study. J Esthet Dent, 1992; 4:
44-47.
17.
Leelawa
t C, Scherer W, Chang J. Addition of fresh amalgam to existing amalgam utilizing various adhesive liners: a SEM study. J Esthet Dent, 1992; 4: 50-53.
18. Özer
F,
Ünlü
N
, Sengün A, Öztürk B. Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and Microleakage. Oper Dent, 2002; 27: 199-203.
19. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Pahini ST, Karesiz A. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Oper Dent, 2000; 25: 316-23.
38
Amalgam
Restorasyonların Farklı Bağlayıcı Ajan ve Materyaller ile Onarımının Kenar Uyumu
Açısından Mikrosızıntı Yöntemi ile İncelenmesi
20. Chang JC, Chan JT, Chedda A, Igle¬sias A. Mikroleakge of amalgam restorations with 4-META bonding agents. J Dent Res, 1993; 72: 223.
21.
Mahle
r DB. Effect of dimensional change of the amalgam on amalgam bond¬ing. Jour Dent Res, 2001; 80: 42.
22.
Meier
s JC, Turner D. Microleakage of dentin/amalgam alloy bonding agents: results after 1 year. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 16-23.
23. Estafan D, Estafan A. Millhouse D. Cavity wall adaptation of resin based com¬posites lined with flowable composites. Am J Dent, 2000; 13: 192-94.
24. Yazıcı AR, Özgünaltay
G
, Dayangaç B. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of classV
cavities. Oper Dent, 2003; 28: 773-78.
25.
Gitte-HaBhof
f K. Tooth-composite ınterface from specific and nonspecific ad¬hesive restoravite system. J Biomed Mater Re Part, 2004; 71: 38-45.
26.
Giannin
i M, Paullillo LAMS,Ambrosano GMB. Effect of surface roughness on amalgam repair using adhesive systems. Brazil Dent, 2002; 13: 179-83.
27.
Nakabayash
i N.Bonding of restora¬tive materials to dentine: the present status in Japan. Int Dent J, 1985; 35: 145-54.
28.
Nakabayash
i N. Adhesive bonding with 4-META. Oper Dent, 1992; 5: 125-30.
29.
Deligeorg
i V, Mjor IA, Wilson NH. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Prim Dent Care, 2001; 8: 5-11.
30.
Charto
n DG, Moore BK. Invitro evaluation of the use of resin liners tore-duce mikroleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent, 1992; 17: 112-19.
31.
Swif
t EJ, Triolo M.Shear bond
strength of10 dentin adhesives. Dent Material, 1992; 8: 370-74.
32.
Berr
y FA. Microlekage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system. Amer Dent Res, 1996; 42: 125-29.
33.
Jessu
p JP, Wandewalle KS, Hermesch CB, Buıkema DJ. Effects of surface treatments on amalgam repair. Oper Dent, 1998; 23:15-20.
34.
Hois
e MA, Miranda FJ, Duncanson MG. Effect of amalgambond on flexural bond strength of amalgam. J Dent Res, 1991;
70: 300.
35.
Hagg
e MS, Lindemuth JS. Effect of prolonged water storage and repeated thermocycling on the reinforcing ability of refrigerated Amalgambond Plus/High Performance Additive in third molars with large mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations. Mil Med, 2002 Sep; 167: 711-14.
36.
Terr
y JF, Duncanson MG, Coury T. Interfacial bond strength of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam. Quintesssence Int, 1998; 29: 411- 15.
37.
Villarroe
l S. Effect of clinical restoratif tecnique on proximal microleakage of classII composites. J Dent Res, 2000;
79: 265.
38.
Winkle
r MM, Moore BK, Rhodes B. Mikroleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13:
245-50.
39.
Coli
P
, Branström J. Marginal adaptation of four different bonding agents in class II composites applied in bulk or two increments. Quintesssence Int 1993; 24: 583-91.
40.
Olme
z A and Ulusu T.Clinical evaluation and marginal microleakage of amalgambond plus. Quintesssence Int, 1997; 28:
651-56.
39
B. Can Yaman, F. Koray
41. Yu S. The effect of water storage on dentin bond strength of 8 bonding agents. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 87.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com