Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

İMPLANT KONUMLARININ ANTERİOR MAKSİLLADA OLUŞTURACAKLARI ETKİLERİN BİYOMEKANİK OLARAK ARAŞTIRILMASI

Evaluation of the Effect of Implant Localization on the Anterior Maxilla

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of dental implant locations on strain values in the anterior maxilla by finite element analysis. Material and Methods: Computed tomography was used to derive the geometry of maxillary five models with different implants locations. The configurations of implants in these models were as follows; two canines in first model, two canines and one central incisor in second model, two canines and two central incisors in third model, two canines and one lateral incisor in fourth model and two canines and two lateral incisors in fifth model. Results: A load of 100 Newton was applied to each crown in vertical loading and 100 Newton was applied to canine sites in horizontal loading. Highest strain values were calculated on the crestal bone. The fifth model was found the most risky model in vertical loading and least risky model in horizontal loading. Conclusion: The results of this study may support to the treatment planning for anterior maxilla. At risky sites, bone-implant contact area may be increased to reduce the resorption.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, anterior maksillada uygulanan dental implantların lokalizasyonlarının implantlar çevresinde oluşan gerinim değerlerine olan etkisinin sonlu eleman analiz yöntemi ile araştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Tomografi görüntülerinden yararlanılarak farklı implant lokalizasyonlarını içeren beş model hazırlanmıştır. Oluşturulan modellerdeki implant dağılımları şu şekildedir; birinci modelde iki kanin, ikinci modelde her iki kaninler ve bir orta kesici, üçüncü modelde her iki kanin ve orta kesici, dördüncü modelde iki kanin ve bir yan kesici, beşinci modelde her iki kanin ve yan kesici dişler bölgelerine implantlar yerleştirilmiştir. Dikey yüklemede tüm kuronlara, yatay yüklemede ise kanin bölgesindeki implantlara kuronun üzerinden 100 Newton'luk çiğneme kuvveti uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: En yüksek gerinim değerleri krestal kemikte ölçülmüştür. Beşinci model dikey yüklemede rezorpsiyon açısından en yüksek, yatay yüklemede en az riske sahip modeldir. Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçları referans alınarak anterior maksilla için tedavi planlamaları yapılabilir. Rezorpsiyon riski bulunan implantlarda implant-kemik temas alanının arttırılması sağlanarak oluşabilecek riskler azaltılabilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-implant-konumlarinin-anterior-maksillada-olusturacaklari-etkilerin-biyomekanik-olarak-arastirilmasi.pdf
  • 3
15
28
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Belser UC,
Bernar
d JP, Buser D. Implant-supported restorations in the anterior region: Prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 1996; 8(9): 875-83.
2.
Pietrokowsk
i J. The bony residual ridge in man. J Prosthet Dent, 1975; 34(4): 456-62.
3.
Misc
h CE. Bone character: second vital implant criterion. Dent Today, 1988; 7(5): 39-40.
4.
Misc
h CE. Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing and progressive loading. Int J Oral Implantol, 1990; 6: 23-31.
5.
Sahi
n S, Çehreli MC, Yalçın E. The influence of functional forces on the biome-chanics of implant-supported prostheses: a review. J Dent, 2002; 30(7-8): 271-82.
6.
Tonett
i MS. Determination of the success and failure of root-form osseointegrated dental implants. Adv Dent Res, 1999; 13:
173-80.
7.
Bide
z MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol, 1992; 18(3): 264-74.
8.
Gen
g JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant den¬tistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet
Dent, 2001; 85(6): 585-98.
9.
Va
n Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2006; 9(4): 257-70.
10.
Crai
g RG, O'Brien, WJ, Powers JM.
Dental materials. 6th ed., St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby, 1996, p.10-26.
11. İnan M. Cisimlerin mukavemeti. 6. bs., İstanbul: İTÜ Vakfı. Yayın No: 25, 1988, s.12-342.
12.
Stanfor
d CM, Brand RA. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J Prosthet Dent, 1999; 81: 553-61.
13.
Fros
t HM. A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1983; 175: 286-92.
14. Frost HM. Perspectives: bone's me¬chanical usage windows. Bone Miner, 1992; 19(3): 257-71.
15.
Fros
t HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wollf's law for clinicians. Angle Orthod, 2000; 74(1): 3-15.
16.
Melse
n B, Lang NP. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res,
2001; 12(2): 144-52.
17.
Weinstei
n AM, Klawitter JJ, Anand SC, Schuessler R. Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants. J Dent Res, 1976;
55(5): 772-77.
18.
DeToll
a DH, Andreana S, Patra A, Buhite R, Comella B. The role of the finite element model in dental implants. J Oral
Implantol, 2000; 26(2): 77-81.
19.
Bath
e KJ. Finite element procedures.
Prentice-Hall: Engelwood Cliff, 1995.
20. Bilgin T. Tam protezlerde
kullanıla
n hazır ölçü kaşıkları için ülkemize uygun standartların araştırılması. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Total
Protez Anabilim Dalı, 1989.
21. Wheeler RC. An atlas of tooth form. Toronto: Harcourt Canada, 1969, p.26.
22. Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kılıçaslan MA, Eskitaşçıoğlu G.
Three-dimensiona
l finite element analysis of the different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported
27
crown. J Prosthet Dent, 2005; 93(3): 227-34.
23.
William
s KR, Watson CJ, Murphy WM, Scott J, Gregory M, Sinobad D. Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants. Quintessence
Int, 1990; 21(7): 563-70.
24.
O'Brie
n WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 2nd ed., Chicago: Quintes¬sence, 1997, p.259-72.
25.
Cibirk
a RM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, Stohler CS. Determining the force absorption quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent, 1992; 67(3): 361-64.
26.
Hojjati
e B, Anusavice KJ. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glass-ceramic dental crowns. J Biomech, 1990; 23(11): 1157-66.
27.
Himmlov
a L, Dostolava T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent, 2004;
91(1): 20-25.
28. İplikçiolu
H
, Akça K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent, 2002; 30 (1): 41-46.
29. Sütpideler M,
Ecker
t SE, Zobitz M, An KN. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004; 19(6): 819-25.
30. Çağlar A, Aydın
C
, Yılmaz C, Kork¬maz T. Effects of mesio distal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxil-
lofac Implants, 2006; 21(1): 36-44.
31.
Barbie
r L, Vander Sloten J, Krzesin-ski G, Schepers E, Van der Perre G. Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of
N.
Bölükbaşı, A. Koçak, T. Özdemir
the dog. J Oral Rehabil, 1998; 25: 847-58.
32.
Teixeir
a ER, Sao Y, Akagawa Y, Shin-doi NA. A comparative evaluation of man¬dibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomecha-
nics. J Oral Rehabil, 1998; 25(4): 299-303.
33. Çankaya Ö. Alt çene total dişsizlik vakalarında implant destekli protez uygula¬malarında, implantların farklı lokalizasyon-larda yerleştirilmesinin ve farklı üst yapıların kullanılmasının kemikteki kuvvet dağılımına etkisinin sonlu elemanlar stres analizi yöntemi ile incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Oral İmplantoloji Anabilim Dalı, 2005.
34. Sağat G. Üst çene total dişsizlik va¬kaları için implant destekli sabit protez uy¬gulamalarında farklı alveol ark formları ve implant pozisyonlarının implantlar çevre¬sindeki stres dağılımına olan etkisinin fem analiz yöntemiyle araştırılması. Doktora Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Oral İmplantoloji Anabilim Dalı,
2002.
35.
Seth
i A, Kaus T, Sochor P, Axmann-Krcmar D, Chanavaz M. Evaluation of the concept of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: 14-year clinical data. Implant Dent, 2002; 11(1): 41-51.
36. Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC,
Gilat A. Use of an axisymmetric finite element method to compare maxillary bone variables for a loaded implant. J Prosthodont, 1993; 2(3): 183-89.
37.
Clellan
d NL, Lee KL, Bimbenet OC, Brantley WA. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthodont, 1995; 4(2): 95-100.
38. Hsu ML, Chen FC, Kao HC, Cheng
CK. Influence of off-axis loading of an ante¬rior maxillary implant: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac
28
Implant
Konumlarının Anterior Maksillada Oluşturacakları Etkilerin Biyomekanik Olarak Araştırılması
Implants, 2007;22 (2): 301-09.
39.
As
h MM. Wheeler's dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 7th ed., Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1993, p.128-273.
40. Kitagawa T, Tanimato Y, Nemoto K, Aida M. Influence of cortical bone quality on stress distribution in bone around dental implant. Dent Mater J, 2005; 24(2): 219-24.
41. Clelland NL, Gilat A. The effect of
abutment angulation on stress transfer for an
implant. J Prosthodont, 1992; 1(1): 24-28.
42.
Saa
b XE, Griggs JA, Powers JM, En¬gelmeier RL. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study. J Prosthet Dent, 2007; 97(2): 85-92.
43.
Adel
l R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brânemark PI. A 15-year study of osseo-integrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg, 1981; 10(6):
387-416.
44.
Quiryne
n M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brânemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1992; 3(3): 104-11.
45.
Balsh
i TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Immediate loading of Brânemark implants in edentulous mandibles: a preliminary report. Implant
Dent, 1997; 6(2): 83-88.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com