Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

STRATEJİK ÜRETİM İŞLETME PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ: YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİ ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The objective of this study is to determine the impact of manufacturing performance, which is created by the manufacturing strategy in textile and automotive supply industries, on business performance. The research was applied to small and medium-sized enterprises operating in textile and automotive supply industries in Turkey. The effect of manufacturing performance to business performance is investigated through the manufacturing performance index based on competitive priorities and advantage manufacturing technologies which are named as manufacturing forces and strategic fit which is alignment between business strategy and manufacturing strategy.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, tekstil ve otomotiv yan sanayi işletmelerinde üretim stratejisine dayalı olarak ortaya çıkan üretim performansının işletme performansına etkisinin tespit edilmesidir. Araştırma Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunan tekstil ve otomotiv yan sanayi küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmelerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Üretim güçleri olarak isimlendirilen rekabet öncelikleri ve ileri imalat teknolojileri ile işletme stratejisiyle üretim stratejisi arasındaki etkileşimi ifade eden stratejik uyuma dayalı olarak hesaplanan üretim performans endeksi aracılığıyla üretim performansının belirlenerek, üretim performansının işletme performansına etkisi araştırılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-stratejik-uretim-isletme-performansi-iliskisi-yapisal-esitlik-modellemesi-uzerine-bir-analiz.pdf
  • 13
62-79
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahmed, N.U., Montagno, R.V. and Firenze, R.J. 1996. Operations Strategy and
Organizational Performance: an Empirical Study. International Journal of Operations &
Production Management 16(5): 41-53.
Bagozzi, R.P. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable
Variables and Measurement Error. A Comment. Journal of Marketing Research 18(3): 375–
381.
Burgess, T.F. and Gules, H.K. 1998. Buyer-supplier relationships in firms adopting
advanced manufacturing technology: An empirical analysis of the implementation of hard and
soft Technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 15: 127-152.
Chase, R.B. and Aquilano, N.J. 1995. Production and Operations Management:
Manufacturing and Services. 7. edition, London, Irwin.
Cleveland, G., Schroeder, R.G. and Anderson, J.C. 1989. A Theory of Production
Competence. Decision Sciences 20 (4): 655–668.
Dangayach, G.S. and Deshmukh, S.G. 2006. An Exploratory Study of Manufacturing
Strategy Practices of Machinery Manufacturing Companies in India. Omega: The Int. Journal
of Management Science 34 (3): 254-273.
Dangayach, G.S. and Deshmukh, S.G. 2001a. Manufacturing strategy: experiences from
Indian manufacturing companies. Productıon Plannıng&Control 12(8): 775–786.
De Toni, A. and Tonchia, S. 1998. Manufacturing flexibility: a literature review. Int.
Journal of Production Research 36(6): 1587-1617.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with
Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39-50.
Gerwin, D. 1993. Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective. Management
Science 39(4), 395–410.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R., Tahtam, R.L and Black W.C. 1998, Multivariate Data
Analysis. Fifth Edition. Prentice-Hall International Inc. New Jersey.
Hill, T.J. 1987. Teaching manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations
&Production Management 6(3): 10-20.
Hoyle, R. H. 1995. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications.
Sage Publication Inc. London.
Mills, J., Platts, K. and Gregory, M. 1995. A Framework for the Design of
Manufacturing Strategy Processes. Int. Journal of Operations & Production Management
15(4): 17-49.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. and Müler, H. 2003. Evaluating the Fit of
Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures.
Methods of Psychological Research Online 8(2): 23–74.
Schumacker, R.E. and Lomax, R.G. 2004. Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation
Modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. New Jersey.
Skinner, W. 1969. Manufacturing--Missing Link in Corporate Strategy. Harvard
Business Review 47(3): 136-145.
Smith, T.M. and Reece, J.S. 1999. The relationship of strategy, fit, productivity, and
business performance in a services setting. Journal of Operations Management 17: 145–161.
Sun, H. and Hong, C. 2002. The alignment between manufacturing and business
strategies: ıts influence on business performance. Technovation 22: 699–705.
Ward, P.T., McCreery, J. K., Rizman, L. P. and Sharma, D. 1998. Competitive Priorities
in Operations Management. Decision Sciences 29(4): 1035-1046.
Yousef M.A. 1992. Getting to Know Advanced Manufacturing Technologies. Industrial
Engineering 24(2): 40–42.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com