Buradasınız

İKTİSAT VE REALİZM İLİŞKİSİ: METODOLOJİK AÇIDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

The Relationship Between Economics And Realism: A Methodological Appraisal

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The relationship between economics and realism is one of the interesting and topical subjects among the economic methodologists and philosophers of science. In this context, it is seen in recent years that the realist approaches have become one of the new inclinations especially in the area of philosophy of economics. In this study, a methodological appraisal is made by discussing the relationship between economics and realism from a critical viewpoint.
Abstract (Original Language): 
İktisat bilimi ve realizm arasındaki ilişki gerek iktisat metodolojistleri gerekse de bilim felsefecileri arasında ilgi çeken güncel konulardan biridir. Bu bağlamda, son yıllarda realist yaklaşımların özellikle iktisat felsefesi alanında yeni yönelimlerden biri haline geldiği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada, iktisat ve realizm ilişkisi eleştirel bir bakış açısıyla ele alınarak metodolojik açıdan bir değerlendirme yapılmaktadır.
215-230

REFERENCES

References: 

Beaulier, Scott A.-Peter Boettke (2004), “The really real in economics”,
Transforming Economics: Perspectives on the critical realist project,
Ed. by Paul Lewis, London, Routledge, pp.187-201.
Boyd, Richard N. (1984), “The Current Status of Scientific Realism”,
Scientific Realism, Ed. by Jarrett Leplin, University of California Press,
pp.41-82.Chakravartty, Anjan (2011), “Scientific Realism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy, Ed. by Edward N. Zalta, (Online) http://plato.
stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/scientific-realism/, 11.12.2011.
Cruse, Pierre (2003), “On Scientific Realism”, Richmond Journal of
Philosophy, 3, Spring.
Deichsel, Simon (2011), “Against the pragmatic justification for realism
in economic methodology”, Erasmus Journal For Philosophy And Economics,
Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 23-41.
Dow, Sheila (2002), Economic Methodology: An Inquiry, Oxford
University Press.
Fraassen, Bas C. van (1980), The Scientific Image, Oxford, Clarendon
Press.
Friedman, Milton (1953), “The Methodology of Positive Economics”,
Essays In Positive Economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press,
pp.3-16.
Hodge, Duncan (2008), “Economics, realism and reality: a comparison of
Mäki and Lawson”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, pp.163–202.
Jespersen, Jesper (2009), Macroeconomic Methodology: A Post-
Keynesian Perspective, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Lawson, Tony (1997), Economics and Reality, London, Routledge.
Mäki, Uskali (1998), “Realism”, The Handbook of Economic Methodology,
Ed. by John B. Davis, D. Wade Hands, Uskäli Maki, Edward
Elgar, , pp. 404-409.
Mäki, Uskali (2002), “Some nonreasons for nonrealism about economics”,
Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism, and Social
Construction, Ed. by Uskali Mäki, Cambridge University Press, pp. 90-104.
Mäki, Uskali (2008), “Scientific realism and ontology”, The New Palgrave
Dictionary of Economics (2nd Edition), Ed. by Steven N. Durlauf and
Lawrence E. Blume, Palgrave Macmillan.
Mäki, Uskali (2011), “Scientific realism as a challenge to economics (and
vice versa)”, Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1–12.
Popper, Karl (1978), “Three Worlds”, The Tanner Lectures On Human
Values, The University of Michigan, pp.143-167.
Putnam, Hilary (1984), “What’s Realism?”, Scientific Realism, Ed. by
Jarrett Leplin, University of California Press, pp.140-153.
Sankey, Howard (1988), Scientific Realism and The Rationality of
Science, Bodmin, Ashgate Publishing Co.
Votsis, Ioannis (2004), “The Epistemological Status Of Scientific Theories:
An Investigation Of The Structural Realist Account”, London School
Of Economics And Political Science, PhD Thesis.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com