Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

KURUMSAL ITIBAR-ORGUTSEL DOKU İLİŞKİSİNE KURAMSAL YAKLAŞIM-I: Paydaş Teorisi

A Theoritical Approach Relationship To Corporate Reputation-Organizational Texture-I: Stakeholder Theory

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Corporate reputation is increasingly pointed out together with sustainability. However, in order for corporate reputation to flourish in a desired path, organic structures of institutions stand as an important element. Although organic structure of institutions is perceived as organizational texture from outside, stakeholders consider it as both a distinctive factor and a corporate texture beacuse of its institutional importance. On the other hand, corporate texture is fed on organizational texture. Several factors, such as culture, play a role in the formation of organizational texture. In addition, organizational texture is affected by interaction between external environment and organization. Therefore, as a distinguishing factor among corporations, in the attainment of corporate reputation the organizational texture plays an active role by forming main dimensions determining attractiveness. In order to direct stake holders' perceptions in the desired way it is important to determine the operation of interaction between organizational texture and corporate reputation. The goal of this study is to synthesize corporate reputation and organizational texture by building on stakeholder theory because of the desire to do a comprehensive study. This study deals with corporate reputation and its formation, organizational texture, and the relationship between corporate reputation and organizational texture by using stakeholder theory.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Günümüzde sürdürülebilir olmakla birlikte "kurumsal itibar", gittikçe vurgu yapılan bir konudur. Kurumsal itibarın oluşumunda kurumsal çekiciliğin rolü yadsınamaz. Ancak kurum itibarının istendiği gibi oluşmasında, kurumların organik yapılanması önem taşımaktadır. Kurumların organik yapılanması, her ne kadar dışarıdan örgütsel doku biçiminde algılanıyorsa da paydaşlar genelde onu, hem ayırt edici bir unsur hem de kurumsal anlam taşıdığı için kurumsal doku olarak ifade edebilmektedirler. Oysa kurumsal itibar üzerinde cezp ediciliğiyle etkili olan kurumsal doku, örgütsel dokuyla beslenmektedir. Örgütsel dokunun oluşumunda ise kültür başta olmak üzere pek çok örgütsel unsurun etkisi bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca çevre ile örgütün etkileşiminden de örgütsel dokunun etkilenebilmesi söz konusudur. Bu yüzden kurumların birbirinden farklılaşmasını sağlayıcı unsur olarak örgütsel doku, arzu edilen itibarın kazanılmasında cezp ediciliği sağlayan temel boyutlara şekil vererek aktif bir rol üstlenmektedir. Özellikle paydaş algılamalarının istenen yönde yönetilebilmesi için örgütsel doku ile kurumsal itibar arasındaki etkileşimin, nasıl ve ne yönde işlediğinin tespiti gerekmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, kurumsal itibar ile örgütsel doku arasındaki ilişkiyi belirli kuramlar bağlamında inceleyerek, bu noktadaki eksiklikleri gidermeye çalışmaktır. Kapsamlı bir kuramsal değerlendirme düşünüldüğünden, konu öncelikle paydaş teorisi bağlamında ele alınmıştır. Bu makalede sırasıyla kurumsal itibar ve oluşumu ile örgütsel doku ele alınmış, daha sonra geliştirilen model bağlamında paydaş teorisi açısından kurumsal itibar-örgütsel doku ilişkisi üzerinde durulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kurumsal-itibar-orgutsel-doku-iliskisine-kuramsal-yaklasim-i-paydas-teorisi.pdf
  • 1
49-64
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Balcı, A. (2000). Örgütsel Gelişme Kavram ve Uygulama. Ankara: Pagem A Yayıncılık Tic. Ltd.
Balmer, J. M. T.
&
Gray, E. R. (2000). Corporate Identity and Corporate Communication: Creating a
Competitive Advantage. Industrial and Commercial Training, 32/1, 256-261. Başaran, I. E. (1982). Örgütsel Davranış. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları, 108. Baum, J. A. C. & Rowley, T. J. (2002). Companion to Organizations: An Introduction. J. A. C. Baum (Editör).
The Blackwell Companion to Organization. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. (2002). Brucato, P. F. & Smith, Jr. D. M. (1997). An Analysis of the Role of Firm Reputation in the Market's
Reaction to Corporate Dividends. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 37, 3, pp. 647-665. Carmeli, A. & Cohen, A. (2001). Organizational Reputation as a Source of Sustainable Competitive
Advantage
and Above-Normal Performance: An Empirical Test among Local Authorities in Israel.
Public Administration & Management: An Interactive Journal, 6/4, 122-165. Chreim, S. (2005). The Continuity-Change Duality in Narrative Texts of Organizational Identity. Journal of
Management Studies, 42/3, 567-593. Clardy, A. (2005). Reputation, Goodwill, and Loss: Entering the Employee Training Audit Equation. Human
Resource Development Review, 4, 279-304. Cooksey, R. W. (2003). "Learnership" in complex organizational textures. Leadership & Organization
Development Journal, 24/4, 204-214. Davies, G. (2006). Corporate Reputation. C. L. Cooper (Editör). The Blackwell Encylopedia of Management.
Malden: Blackwell Publishing. Şubat 16, 2007 http://www.blackwell
refence.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9780631233176_chunk_ g978140511828610_ss19-2. Dentchev, N. A. & Heene, A. (2004). Managing the reputation restructuring corporations: Send the right
signal to the right stakeholder. Journal of Public Affairs, 4/1, 56-72. Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication
and Resource-Based Theories. Journal of Management, 26/6, 1091-1112. Dowling, G. R. (2004). Corporate Reputations: Should You Compete On Yours? California Management
Review, 46/3, 19-37.
Fillis, I. (2003). Image, Reputation and Identity Issues in the Arts and Crafts Organization. Corporate
60
ILETIŞIM FAKÜLTESI DERGISI
Reputation Review, 6/3, 239-251. Fombrun, C. J. (1986). Structural Dynamics within and between Organization. Administrative Since
Quarterly, 31/3, 403-421.
Fombrun, C. J.
&
Shanley, M.
(1990)
. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy.
Academy of Management Journal, 33/2, 233-258.
Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., Bernett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate
Citizenship and Reputational Risk. Business and Society Review, 105/1, 85-106. Fombrun, C. J., (2006). Corporate Reputations as Economic Assets. M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison
(Editörler).
The
Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management. Malden: Blackwell Pub. Şubat 16, 2007,
http: //Blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id= g9780631218616_ chunk_ g978063121861614. Fombrun C. J. & van Riel C. B. M. (2003). Fame Fortune:How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations
Upper Saddle River: FT Press. Gotsi, M. & Wilson, A. M. (2001). Corporate reputation: seeking a definition. Corporate Communications: An
International Journal, 6/1, 24-30. Gillespie, D. F & Perry, R. W. (1975). The Influence of an Organizational Environment on
Interorganizational Relations. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 34/1, 29-42.
Göksel
, A. B. (1994). Halkla İlişkiler. Izmir: Ege Üniversitesi iletişim Fakültesi Yayınları 4. Green, P. S. (1996). Şirket Ününü Korumanın Yolları. Abdullah Ersoy (Çeviren). Istanbul: Milliyet Yayınları
(1993).
Gruning, J. E. & Repper, F. C. (2005). Stratejik Yönetim, Kamular ve Gündemler. J. E. Gruning (Editör).
Halkla İlişkiler ve İletişim Yönetiminde Mükemmellik. Elif Özsayar (Çeviren). Istanbul: Rota Yayın
Yapım Tanıtım Tic. Ltd. Şti. (1992). Hanlon, G. (2004). Institutional Forms and Organizational Structures: Homology, Trust and Reputational
Capital in Professional Service Firms. Organization, 11/2, 187-210. Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55/8, 989-1018. Hutton, J.G., Goodman, M.B., Alexander, J.B., Genest, C.M. (2001). Reputation Management: the new face
corporate public relations? Public Relations Review, 27/3, s.247. Kay, J. (1995). Foundations of Corporate Success: How Business Strategies Add Value, Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Kiousis, S., Popescu, C., Mitrook, M. (2007). Understanding Influence on Corporate Reputation: An Examination of Public Relations Effects, Media Coverage, Public Opinion, and Financial Performance From an Agenda-Building and Agenda-Setting Perspective. Journal of Public Relations
61
ILETIŞIM FAKÜLTESI DERGISI
Research, 19/2, 147-165.
Kotha, S., Rajgopal, S., Rindova, V. (2001). Reputation Building and Performance: An Emprical Analysis of the Top-50 Pure Internet Firms. European Management Journal, 19/6, 571-586.
Leblebici, D. N. (2004). Örgüt Çevre İlişkisinde Yeni Perspektif Arayışı: Dinamik Örgütsel Çevre ve Örgütsel Doku. H. Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22/2, 285-307.
Lewellyn, P. G. (2002). Corporate Reputation Focusing the Zeitgeist. Business & Society, 41/4, 446-455.
Mahon, J. F. (2002). Corporate Reputation A Research Agenda Using Strategy and Stakeholder Literatüre. Business & Society, 41/4, 415-445.
Markwick, N. & Fill, C. (1997). Towards a framework for managing corporate identity. European Journal of
Marketing, 31/5-6, 396-409.
Meijer, M. M. & Kleinnijenjuis, J. (2006). News and corporate reputation: Emprical findings from the
Netherlands. Public Relations Review, 32, 341-348. Metcalfe, C. E. (1998). The Stakeholder Corporation. A European Review Business Ethics, 7/1, 30-36. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
Englewood Cliffs,
Morgan, G. (1989). Creative Organization Theory: A Researchbook, California: Sage Pub.
Olesen, H. S. (2001). Professional identity as learning processes in life histories. Journal of Workplace
Learning, 13/7-8, 290-297.
Özalp, I. & Tonus, Z. (2003). Paydaş Teorisi (Stakeholder Theory) ve Freeman, Donaldson-Preston, Mitchell-Angle-Wood ve Arroll'un Paydaş Teorisine Yaklaşımlarının İncelenmesi. 11. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. Afyon: Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Pajunen, K. (2006). Stakeholder influences in Organizational Survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43/6,
1261-1288.
Podnar, K. & Jancic, Z. (2006). Towards a Categorization of Stakeholder Groups: An Empirical Verification
of a Three-Level
Model. Journal of Marketing Communications, 12/4, 297-308. Rao, H. (1994). The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the
Survival of Organization in the American Automobile Industry: 1895-1912. Strategic Management
Journal, 15, 29-44.
Saydam, A. (2005). İletişimin Akıl ve Gönül Penceresi ALGILAMA YÖNETİMİ, İstanbul: Rota Yayın Yapım
Tic. Ltd.
Sagel, M. (1974). Organization and Environment: A Typology of Adaptability and Structure. Public Administration Review, 34/3, 212-220.
62

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com