Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Finansal tablolarda şerefiye ve maddi olmayan duran varlıkların değer ilişkisi ve güvenilirliği: İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası uygulaması

Value relevance and reliability of goodwill and intangibles on financial statements: the case of Istanbul Stock Exchange

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Failure in reflecting the impact of intangibles on financial statements on the current and future market value of the company leads an investor that financial statements are insufficient to present an unbiased (true and fair) view of the firm's financial position. In that context the aim of this study is to examine financial reporting reliability of goodwill and intangibles and value relevance of financial reports. To observe the effects of accounting variables on market value of equity Feltham and Ohlson Model (1995) is employed and panel data method is applied which handles both cross sections and time series. Results indicate that the abnormal operating earnings is the main market value driver whereas the coefficients of goodwill and intangibles imply that there is lack of reliability in financial reporting.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Finansal tablolarda maddi olmayan duran varlıkların işletmelerin mevcut ve gelecekteki piyasa değerini yansıtmada yetersiz kalması, yatırımcılara işletmenin finansal durumunun tarafsız (doğru ve adil) bir şekilde sunulamamasına neden olmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, çalışmada finansal raporlamada güvenilirliğin ve başta şerefiye ve maddi olmayan duran varlıklar olmak üzere finansal tablolardaki değer ilişkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Muhasebe değişkenlerinin özsermayenin piyasa değeri üzerindeki etkisini incelemek amacıyla Feltham ve Ohlson Modeli’nden (1995) hareket edilmiş ve yatay kesit ve zaman serilerini birlikte ele alabilen panel data yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, şerefiye ve maddi olmayan duran varlık kalemlerinin finansal raporlamada güvenilirliğinin eksikliğine işaret ederken, artık faaliyet karının (abnormal operating earnings) piyasa değerinin esas belirleyicisi olduğunu göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-finansal-tablolarda-serefiye-maddi-olmayan-duran-varliklarin-deger-iliskisi-guvenilirligi-istanbul-menkul-kiymetler-borsasi-uygulamasi.pdf
  • 2
155-165
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] L. Conibani, A. Covarsi, M.P. Sanchez, The Value Relevance and Managerial Implications of Intangibles: A Literature Review. MERITUM (Measuring intangibles to understand and improve innovation management) Project (1999).
[2] C.M. Deegan, Australian Financial Accounting. McGraw-Hill, Sydney, 2005.
[3] M.C. Miller, Goodwill discontent: The meshing of Australian and international accounting policy. Australian Accounting Review. 5, 1, 3-16 (1995).
[4] N.T. Churyk, Reporting goodwill: are the new accounting standards consistent with market valuations?. Journal of Business Research. 58, 1353-1361 (2005).
[5] K.W. Chauvin, M. Hirschey, Goodwill, Profitability, and Market Value of The Firm. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy. 13, 2, 159-180 (1994).
[6] C. Eckstein, The Measurement and Recognition of Intangible Assets: Then and Now. Accounting Forum. 28, 139-158 (2004).
[7] J. Ohlson, Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Security Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research. Spring, 661-687 (1995).
[8] G. Feltham, J. Ohlson, Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities. Contemporary Accounting Research. Spring, 689-731 (1995).
Ü.Gümrah, B. Adiloğlu / İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 40, 2, (2011) 155-165 © 2011
164
[9] M.E. Barth, W.H. Beaver, W.R. Landsman, The Relevance of The Value-Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 31 (1–3), 77–104 (2001).
[10] K.I. Popova, Applying the Ohlson and Feltham-Ohlson Models for Equity Valuation: Some Accounting Considerations, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=412283 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.412283 (2003).
[11] E.O. Edwards, P.W. Bell, The Theory and Measurement of Business Income. University of California Press, 1961.
[12] K.V. Peasnell, On Capital Budgeting and Income Measurement. Abacus. 17, 1, 52-67 (1981).
[13] K.V. Peasnell, Some Formal Connnections Between Economic Values and Yields and Accounting Numbers. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 9, 3, 361-381 (1982).
[14] A.S. Ahmed, R.M. Morton, T.F. Schaefer, Accounting Conservatism and the Valuation of Accounting Numbers: Evidence on the Feltham-Ohlson (1996) Model. Working Paper. SSRN (1998).
[15] F. Modigliani, M. Miller, The Cost of Capital, Corporate Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review. 48, 3, June, 261–97 (1958).
[16] R.D. Vázquez, Value Relevance of the Ohlson Model with Mexican data. Documento de Trabajo. No. 01 (2006).
[17] D. Collins, M. Pincus, H. Xie, Equity Valuation and Negative Earnings: The Role of Book Value of Equity. The Accounting Review. 74, 1, 29-61 (1999).
[18] N. Garrod, W. Rees, International Diversification and Firm Value. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 25, 9, 1255-1281 (1998).
[19] S.P. Kothari, J.L. Zimmerman, Price and Return Models. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 20, 155-192 (1995).
[20] W. W. Choi, S.S. Kwon, G.J. Lobo, Market Valuation of Intangible Assets. Journal of Business Research. 49, 35-45 (2000).
[21] J. Godfrey, P. Koh, The Relevance to Firm Valuation of Capitalising Intangible Assets in Total and by Category. Australian Accounting Review. 11, 2, 39-49 (2001).
[22] F.N. Dahmash, R.B, Durand, J. Watson, The Value Relevance and Reliability of Reported Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets. The British Accounting Review. 1-18 (2009).
[23] A. Amir, T.S. Harris, and E.K. Venuti, A Comparison of the Value-Relevance of US versus Non-US GAAP Accounting Measures Using Form 20-F Reconciliations. Journal of Accounting Research. 31, 230-264 (1993).
[24] M.G. McCarthy, D.K. Schneider, Market Perception of Goodwill: Some Empirical Evidence. Accounting and Business Research. 26, 69-81 (1995).
[25] R. Jennings, J. Robinson, R.B. Thompson II, and L. Duvall, The Relation Between Accounting Goodwill Numbers and Equity Values. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 23, 513-533 (1996)
[26] B. Baltagi, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. NJ, USA, 2006.
Ü.Gümrah, B. Adiloğlu / İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 40, 2, (2011) 155-165 © 2011
165
[27] P. De Jager, Panel Data Techniques and Accounting Research. Meditari Accountancy Research. 16, 2, 53-68 (2008).
[28] W. Greene, Econometric Analysis. 3rd edition, Upper Saddle River, N.J., Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2003.
[29] C. Hsiao, Analysis of Panel Data. 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[30] D. Asteriou, S.G. Hall, Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Revised Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, ISBN: 978-0-230-50640-4, 2007.
[31] M.K.M. Ibrahim, M.S. Marzita, A.L. Radziah, and A.S. Zaleha, Value-relevance of Accounting Numbers: An empirical Investigation of Purchased Goodwill. Malaysian Accounting Review. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2003).
[32] R. Bildik, Are Calendar Anomalies Still Alive: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange, ssrn.com/abstract=598904 (2004).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com